Goodbye Apathy (Because of Sarah Palin, conservatives now have no choice but to back McCain)

American Prowler ^ | 9/2/2008 | Paul Chesser

[Darkwolf377]

I'd point out to you that you haven't made a single intellectual argument--you've only taken what I've said and essentially written, "No, YOU'RE the one who's gonna do that!"

It's incredibly childish, and void of any intellectual content.

Thus, I have all I need to know about your infantile position.

I expect you'll respond yet again, but really, your posts are quite dull, and you're beyond having a decent discussion. Enjoy your support for Obama, because of course, he's no different from McCain.

If you truly believe that, you're not just immature and uninformed--you're...well, I'll keep that to myself.

Goodbye.

[MartinStyles]

Did you watch obama’s speech? Liked it?

[Dagny&Hank]

You only say that because in Montana your vote is not needed since McCain-Palin will win Montana. But we need every vote in borderline states. I'd hate to wake up to Obama having won by a few votes -- because he won my state by a few votes.

[Liberty2007]

republicans let the 2nd district in Arkansas have a free one, the demrat can keep his campaign money probably build a pool with it or something.

[Liberty2007]

republicans let the 2nd district in Arkansas have a free one, the demrat can keep his campaign money probably build a pool with it or something.

[Liberty2007]

no, I sure didnt, I know he is lying. With mccain its hard to tell

[MartinStyles]

Actually, I don’t think hussein was lying all that much. He promised to socialize the country. And ban guns too.

[bmwcyle]

Apathy was not the correct word. The correct word was ANGER.

[roamer_1]

I'd point out to you that you haven't made a single intellectual argument--you've only taken what I've said and essentially written, "No, YOU'RE the one who's gonna do that!"

Again, quite the contrary.

You accused me of helping a liberal attain office. I denied it, and said that you were, that is true, giving you specific examples of McCain's supported positions which do in fact prove his socialist/globalist bent.

You made not a single effort to deny these positions which I pointed out to you, because in fact, as I am sure you know, they are undeniable. Rather than try to defend the indefensible, you again try to assail me from another angle, again trying to make me the one enabling liberalism.

Once again, I turned it about on you, giving specific examples, which you again failed to defend against.

The problem that you have in this conversation is that you ARE IN FACT supporting a socialist/globalist, and you know it. No matter how you might like it to be true, that your socialist is less of a socialist than the other team's socialist is not a valid argument, and cannot be sustained.

To be sure, the only thing one gets when sustaining Republican globalism/socialism is *LESS* Conservatism, as previous years should well demonstrate.

There is no defense for supporting liberalism as a means of promoting Conservatism. They are diametrically opposed. What you seem to be left with then, is merely rampant Republicanism. Rah rah.

Have a nice day.

[roamer_1]

You only say that because in Montana your vote is not needed since McCain-Palin will win Montana.

MT is no easy win for Republicans anymore... And especially not McCain.

[Terpfen]

(Because of Sarah Palin, conservatives now have no choice but to back McCain)

As opposed to "Because of Obama?"

[ExGeeEye]

I prefer a RINO to an AINO.

I was already there, and Palin makes it easier.

[Ann Archy]

Sarah is a GAME CHANGER....PERIOD!!!

[Byron_the_Aussie]

Whay don't you vote Democrat?

With your whining, your moaning and your demand to have the world your way, you're in their corner attitudinally anyway.

[MBB1984]

Yes, indeed. McCain had done a good job of trying to reinvent himself to conservatives. But, those really seeking the truth know McCain for the traitor that he is. And, if elected he will “reeducate” those within the party to comply with his beliefs or they will be purged.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

...obama will destory the nation, so will mccain...

What nonsense. You don't have much faith in America, if you believe that.

How about taking a break from complaining and helping to elect the best option you have right now?

[ElectricStrawberry]

So....because of Palin, I’m supposed to support a guy who violated his oath of office by trashing the Constitution with his CFR bill?

Pass...

[hunter112]

Whatever yas wanna call it, you're still voting for John "Amnesty" McCain.

I just saw LIEberman on MSNBC this morning, and if Goober Graham had been any more persuasive, the coin could have indeed flipped that way, so I understand where you're coming from.

Sarah Palin gets me out of my apathy for two reasons: 1) If the ticket loses, it will be because Juan screwed it up in some way, and she will still be a viable conservative leader in 2012, and 2) If the ticket wins, I am counting on her to keep McCain honest, even to the point of resigning if he picks a liberal idiot for a SCOTUS nomination. I'm guided by her experiences in Alaska in dealing with corruption in her own party.

I'll admit, not much to hang my hat on, but it's all I've got at this point. A week ago, I was prepared to vote for Ralph Nader (what difference would my vote make in NY?) just to keep that windbag alive in four years when we were more likely to need him.

[Guenevere]

Stepping out in faith.