Posted on 08/28/2008 1:57:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl
Not to worry. I'll sign you up.
Wouldn't want you to miss any messages from your man! ;-)
Now, now--no need to get hostile...
That is not liability insurance. That would be collision insurance. Liability is for the damage I cause. I cannot cause damage in more than one car at a time.
And don't say it is because I can cause more damage in subsequent accidents, because my liability on one car covers me when I'm in a rental.
Just tryin’ to help! lol.
(p.s. — I wouldn’t do that, so don’t worry).
Oops... good point.
In that case, I have no idea! ;-)
And I would take that to the bank.
There is one thing I never want to see from you and that is payback.
LOL
You say that as if you are proud of it.
***********
I am proud of it. Farmers is a good company. And I am a good agent. I take care of my clients and make sure they get every discount that’s possible and the best coverage to protect their assets.
The plan I like even better would be 'pay as you pump' which would provide a minimum of insurance to all- while hitting lesser drivers the least. Of course, you could always buy more for your Astin Martin. And, if you feel the urge to drive the riding mower to the convenience store, you're covered!
What do you think of what you said when compared to what I said in Replies 54 and 55?
As a rural driver, your fifty miles driven hardly equal the risk taken by someone on I-680 through Concord, for instance. So, miles driven and risk have no correlation as 'area' isn't figuered in.
If insurance is going to be mandatory, the best way to pay for it would be at the pump, and a system could easily determine that you already have insurance when you swipe a card. For those paying cash, the price of a gallon could reflect a fee for insurance (unless they produce an insurance card, etc.)
The system I'd propose would reward rural dwellers as it would discount any fee imposed based upon area accident rate statistics. Large urban areas would by nature have to pay more given their higher rate of accidents.
For people living in the middle of nowhere, four dollar a gallon gas is already a tax. No need for an insurance company to pile on. I'd settle for a minimum fee to cover fender benders so you aren't holding the bag when some loser rearends your car- which is paid for by said 'loser' each time he buys gas. At the same time, insurance cos. should be able to sell additional insurance as may be needed, but those rates should reflect the 'risks' driving represents in certain areas. The same logic could be applied to a gallon of gas: cityboy ain't getting any 'free ride' when he rolls into an East Bay Arco station.
ps. Could you flush your toilets a little more often, Folsom Lake is getting low.
Never going to happen because you're a committed conservative and on my Good Guy list.
Your whole reply was great! You explained your point of view very well and I appreciate it! In fact, I even enjoyed it as you caused me to pause and as a "considerate conservative," you cause me to RE-consider many of your precise points!!!
I'm not sure you've changed my mind yet, but I'm really thinking hard! (and that's hard!!!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.