Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As of October, FBI To Allow Warrantless Investigations
Slashdot ^ | 8/22/8 | timothy

Posted on 08/23/2008 9:47:06 AM PDT by Clint Williams

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: B4Ranch

I use to think if I never did anything wrong, I was okay with this stuff.
Not anymore.

Innocent people can have their homes taken away for no good reason.

Think about it. All they need are the “laws” and they can do anything they want and when have you ever know anyone to be “that honest, anytime, anywhere”?

Imminent domain come to mind? people are losing their homes left and right.

And all this just in time for the Marxist about to take control?


21 posted on 08/23/2008 10:12:49 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

and yet, we have people like the terrorist Ayers and Co. running free and teaching in a University for heaven’s sake.


22 posted on 08/23/2008 10:15:01 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bornred

Just call me Jeremiah.


23 posted on 08/23/2008 10:16:47 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dsc; B4Ranch

I might be a tad touchy here, but read B4Ranch’s post no 5.

Do those reasons posted look to you like good reasons to permit this????


24 posted on 08/23/2008 10:17:23 AM PDT by sauropod (What do Osama and Obama have in common? They both have friends that bombed the Pentagon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Lol. The oath is to the Constitution. Not the country.

We go to War with the Constitution we have, not the one we should have.

25 posted on 08/23/2008 10:18:55 AM PDT by BGHater (Democracy is the road to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: karnage

“Except the wiretapping was illegal - along with many other activities under COINTELPRO.”

It may or may not have been illegal under one statute or another, but it was not unconstitutional.


26 posted on 08/23/2008 10:19:18 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“Lol. The oath is to the Constitution. Not the country.
We go to War with the Constitution we have, not the one we should have.”

I have no idea what point you are trying to make.


27 posted on 08/23/2008 10:20:52 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
I have nothing to hide!SmileyCentral.com
28 posted on 08/23/2008 10:22:10 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
You keep implying that the Constitution is not a suicide pact, correct?

Well change it.

For now use the one we have. Besides, the Oath we take as service men and the one the Pres takes is the Constitution, not our country. What do you want safe the Country or keep the Constitution?

29 posted on 08/23/2008 10:26:06 AM PDT by BGHater (Democracy is the road to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dsc
er..

‘is the Constitution’ = ‘is to the Constitution’

30 posted on 08/23/2008 10:27:33 AM PDT by BGHater (Democracy is the road to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; bornred; sauropod; CPOSharky; TribalPrincess2U

Ladies and Gentlemen,
If you are a Veteran who had access to weapons or military training, it is possible that you come under this ‘ruling’. If our government is going to hell in a handbag, I suggest that you read BOTH of these posts. Use the proper tools and equipment. Take your time and do it right. Then and most important DO NOT TELL ANYONE WHERE YOUR CACHE IS. Why not? We all have breaking points. The person you tell may succumb to just the threat of penalty.

(+) THE ART OF THE CACHE (+)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a9f53301414.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1735279/posts

Pray with me that we can use the Courts and Congress to straighten this out.


31 posted on 08/23/2008 10:27:49 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

“I might be a tad touchy here, but read B4Ranch’s post no 5.
Do those reasons posted look to you like good reasons to permit this????”

Yes.

Any law can be abused. That’s just part of life among the humans. However, that doesn’t mean we can get along without laws.

Why wouldn’t you want a close eye kept on people who travel to regions of the world known for terrorist activity, when those people also have access to weapons or military training? And as unpopular as it is today, when the whackos have convinced us all that racial profiling is worse than the rape and murder of a child, we should be profiling midlle easterners and muslims, refusing them entry to the country and expelling every one of them we can.

England, France, Holland, and Germany have already come to bitterly regret not expelling the muslims while they still could. Must we be next? Really?


32 posted on 08/23/2008 10:27:59 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

I wonder how the “Spy without a warrant! If you’ve got nothing to hide...” crowd will feel about all of this when dems control the legislative and executive branches. Betcha they won’t be as supportive of this stuff.


33 posted on 08/23/2008 10:28:20 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
It's the Islamists' fault.

34 posted on 08/23/2008 10:28:27 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

The FBI is slowing morphing into the KGB.

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”

Patrick Henry


35 posted on 08/23/2008 10:29:12 AM PDT by diverteach (http://foolishpleasurestudio.com/eyewool/slap_hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“You keep implying that the Constitution is not a suicide pact, correct? Well change it.”

I don’t need to change it. We only need to understand its plain language correctly.

And the constitution we have allows us to do many things that the left’s perverted interpretation of it does not. This is a case in point.


36 posted on 08/23/2008 10:30:49 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dsc
There is a document called the Constitution, but it is not a suicide pact,

That is getting a bit thin, the Constitution is not toilet paper either.

There are some explicitly clear individual rights that are being declared null and void because hey, they are the FBI and all good guys and we should trust them.

They can KMA on a bright sunny Sunday morning while they are at it.

37 posted on 08/23/2008 10:35:00 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TLI

“There are some explicitly clear individual rights that are being declared null and void because hey, they are the FBI and all good guys and we should trust them.”

All right, name one of these rights and the section of the constitution that protects it.


38 posted on 08/23/2008 10:39:45 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dsc

The wiretapping under COINTELPRO in the 1960s and 1970s was illegal - which is why the program had to be officially shut down when it was exposed in 1971. Hoover explicitly violated numerous federal statutes in designing and implementing the program. Hoover died before he could be prosecuted for COINTELPRO - not that he would have been, given the amount of dirt the FBi had gathered (also illegally) on just about every major pol of the day.


39 posted on 08/23/2008 10:46:31 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dsc
The main body of the Constitution forbids very few things. The Bill of Rights restrict unreasonable searches, and thereby empowers government to conduct REASONABLE searches.

Many people fail to notice that part and conclude that ALL searches have to be authorized by a warrant, which, of course, is not true.

A reasonable search under wartime conditions would include wiretapping enemy troops and their domestic fifth column.

40 posted on 08/23/2008 10:48:56 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson