Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is McCain going to screw conservatives (again)?
michellemalkin.com ^ | August 19, 2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/19/2008 9:45:40 AM PDT by the anti-liberal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-207 next last
To: rbbeachkid

The very best thing you can do, regardless of who you vote for on the top of the ticket (if at all), is to vote for as many conservatives as you can down ticket.


41 posted on 08/19/2008 10:06:19 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Yes, and sounding like just another unappeasable.


42 posted on 08/19/2008 10:06:48 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
Not sure it matters. The VP does not pick justices and does not sign bills into law. And if McCain is elected and passes away in office, a pro-abortion VP is still only going to be able to dlea with legislation that the congress sends up.

If McCain wins he will be working with a house and senate with a makeup pretty much like exists today - Dems may strengthen their majorities slightly, but not to a supermajority. Is that congress going to be able to send a powerfully pro-abortion bill (or a powerfully anti-abortion bill) up to the president? I doubt it.

This just seems like a tempest in a teapot. McCain is a pro-life senator, and would be a pro-life President, but he's not likely to be able to do much to advance the issue in either direction. The good news here is, congress is not likely to be able to do much harm, unless there is a much much larger pro-Dem blowout than what is anticipated.

43 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:08 AM PDT by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Rush is talking about this today. The only chance Barak Obama has of becoming President is if John McCain selects a pro-choice running mate like Ridge or Leiberman. That’s why the RAT media is promoting them.

McCain should find out which one of his campaign operatives are making these calls and fire him. Of course, Ridge is co-chairman of the campaign. So it could be Ridge who’s making the calls.


44 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:10 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Always do


45 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:14 AM PDT by rbbeachkid (When is enough enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
Griping here does nothing. Take action. Even if it is a bogus rumor, it can't hurt for Conservatives to flex our muscles and remind McCain where votes and funding come from.
46 posted on 08/19/2008 10:07:54 AM PDT by mnehring (http://www.heyobamababy.com/obama_baby_cool_cat.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

If you got the kind of trashy, disgusting, vicious, racially charged email she has on a regular basis, it would probably get to you too.


47 posted on 08/19/2008 10:08:34 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush

Who?


48 posted on 08/19/2008 10:08:36 AM PDT by mnehring (http://www.heyobamababy.com/obama_baby_cool_cat.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush
"God is in control of who wins, anyway"

That doesn't absolve you of responsibility!

49 posted on 08/19/2008 10:10:00 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Go Ron Go!

Yes, GO! (Away)

50 posted on 08/19/2008 10:10:25 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

It only works if enough people vote for the same third party or write-in.


51 posted on 08/19/2008 10:11:27 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

“We didn’t - the media picked a loser for us.”

Certainly they got their “maverick”, but it was after all voters in the primary who picked McCain over say, the clear conservative choice, Duncan Hunter.


52 posted on 08/19/2008 10:12:12 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

“The only way you have to do this is to not vote for him.”

I hear what you are saying but see my tagline.....


53 posted on 08/19/2008 10:12:35 AM PDT by oust the louse (NOT voting this November is a vote for Barack Hussein Obama....think about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

This has to be a smoke screen. No way the McCain campaign is that stupid to pick a pro-choice VP. (or are they? geez)


54 posted on 08/19/2008 10:13:09 AM PDT by lincolnton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven

I think the main question here is not so much what kind of a presidency will a pro-choicer be but how many voters will a “pro-choicer” turn away?


55 posted on 08/19/2008 10:14:55 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Yes, GO! (Away)

Who is this "Ron" person? Not Ron Paul? Is he even running? I thought Bob Barr was the LP candidate?

56 posted on 08/19/2008 10:15:26 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush
Christ was not a pragmatist, therefore I am not a pragmatist.

Did Christ ever have to vote?

57 posted on 08/19/2008 10:16:28 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: lincolnton

What is a pro-choice VP going to DO about Roe v. Wade?


58 posted on 08/19/2008 10:17:51 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
We didn’t - the media picked a loser for us.

Baloney. The voters picked McCain.

59 posted on 08/19/2008 10:18:01 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
Remember how selective the coverage was? Think about how much thought the average Joe or Jane gives to selection choice and how much influence seeing and hearing repeated coverage of select candidates have on their choices.

A biased media has too much influence in these matters. It's disgusting.

60 posted on 08/19/2008 10:18:53 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson