Considering McCain’s stance is less than conservative, I hardly think he’s foolish enough to pick a Pro-Choice VP, and risk the election.
mcshamnsty could give 2 f*arts about Free Republic AND/OR CONSERVATISM.
This will just be an entree of the main dinner to come, for which many McCain backers dont even have a PLAN B. All they can think about is avoiding the big bad wolf Obama, but what happens when the panther then comes over and sinks its big teeth into conservatives' bones to the marrow.
Oh well, it will at least feeeeeeel a bit better than if Jug Ears is doing it, I s'pose.
I see no benefit at all to a Pro-Life LIEberman being Veep either.
I don’t see this as all that important to get worked up about.
Are we sure this isn’t a Democratic ploy to put Republicans at each other’s throats?
There is a thread on here that says Rudy is the “Pro-Choice” pick. But Rudy is the opening speaker, and they rarely have the future VP introduce.
Maybe the leak was about having Pro-Choice speakers like Rudy, not a Pro-C Vice-President.
Regardless you cannot change McCain’s mind if they have decided. But I strongly suspect this is a false controversy. Only time will tell.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I would make one respectful suggestion: consider asking the admin moderator to change "Pro-Choice" to "Pro-Abortion" in the title.
The term "pro-choice" was invented by abortionists and their allies back in the 80's. They had found that "pro-abortion" did not test well in their focus groups. It has been parroted by the MSM ever since.
Like much of the politically correct corruption of our language, it serves to diminish meaning, trying to make the guilty feel better about themselves, hiding the reality of what words really mean.
Anyway, just a thought. :)