Skip to comments.
Judge says UC can deny class credit to Christian school students
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 8/12/8
| Bob Egelko
Posted on 08/12/2008 6:49:07 PM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
1
posted on
08/12/2008 6:49:08 PM PDT
by
SmithL
Otero, S. James
- Born 1951 in Los Angeles, CA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Central District of California
Nominated by George W. Bush on January 7, 2003, to a seat vacated by Richard A. Paez; Confirmed by the Senate on February 10, 2003, and received commission on February 12, 2003.
Education:
California State University, B.A., 1973
Stanford Law School, J.D., 1976
Professional Career:
Law clerk/attorney, Office of the City Attorney, Los Angeles, California, 1976-1987
General counsel & vice president, Regional Counsel Southern Pacific Transportation, 1987-1988
Judge, Municipal Court of Los Angeles, California, 1988-1990
Judge, Superior Court of the State of California, 1990-2003
Race or Ethnicity: Hispanic
Gender: Male
2
posted on
08/12/2008 6:49:27 PM PDT
by
SmithL
(Drill Dammit!)
To: SmithL
more discrimination of religion for christians while we embrace muslim beliefs and sharia law.
we are being primed.
To: SmithL
Wonder if Otero believes in hell?
Seems to me to exlude religious thought or teaching is discrimination that is anti the First Ammendment.
To: SmithL
Translation: Otero has never had to actually work for a living.
5
posted on
08/12/2008 6:54:21 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: SmithL
because they omitted important topics in science and history and failed to teach critical thinking. Meanwhile, the public schools do this, but their courses are accepted.
To: SmithL
7
posted on
08/12/2008 6:55:25 PM PDT
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: television is just wrong
There will be a lot of “critical thinking” in hell.
8
posted on
08/12/2008 6:55:54 PM PDT
by
Rodm
(Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
To: SmithL
A Christian text that thoroughly covered evolution ought to be allowed. However, it is silly to say someone is fully qualified to take college level biology without a working knowledge of evolution. If the text leaves it out, then the university is RIGHT to reject the school’s qualification.
9
posted on
08/12/2008 6:56:07 PM PDT
by
Mr Rogers
(Old, pale and stale - McCain in 2008! but we're only one vote away from losing the 2nd amendment...)
To: SmithL
This should be a good

thread.
10
posted on
08/12/2008 6:58:06 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
To: SmithL
I’m assuming that textbooks cover a whole lot more than the appearance and change of life forms.
If it is 10% of a textbook (which it isn’t), then these students would get 10% of the answers wrong. That leaves them with 90% of THAT subject. And it is only 1 of many subjects which aren’t affected at all by this issue.
They should not be denied a college education because someone questions 10% or less of their education in one small area of one subject.
11
posted on
08/12/2008 6:59:20 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: SmithL
Is UC state or private.
if state then there is a state obstructing the free exercise clause of the first amendment not to mention Calif. constitution.
13
posted on
08/12/2008 7:03:08 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: SmithL
So judges are now experts on writing textbooks and declaring what content is and is not allowed?
incredible.
To: longtermmemmory
obstructing the free exercise clause of the first amendment... Is that clause still in there? I thought it was deleted from the Living Constitution long ago. I read every question from BHO's final exams in his Constitutional Law course, and it was never mentioned.
15
posted on
08/12/2008 7:16:10 PM PDT
by
RogerD
(Educaiton Profesionul)
To: SmithL
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the University of California can deny course credit to applicants from Christian high schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible and reject evolution. What about people who believe in modern mathematics and probability theory (which evolutionism is incompatible with)? They gonna deny them access to UC too?
To: television is just wrong
Extra credit would be given to the applicant coming from a muzzie high school.
17
posted on
08/12/2008 7:18:24 PM PDT
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: longtermmemmory
Is UC state or private. UC is the public university system of the state of California. It is enormous, probably the largest system in the country, with many separate schools: UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Santa Barbara, UC Davis, and on and on.
To: wendy1946
there’s a reason why people who promote evolution are also in favor of whole language and Everyday Math...
19
posted on
08/12/2008 7:18:47 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obamuh uh uh uh uh uh uh ummmmmm)
To: Mr Rogers
Almost every private Christian school teaches Evolution alongside Creationism (something the public schools could adapt?). Most private Christian schools realize that a strong knowledge of Evolution is needed to succeed in any secular collage. As a consequence, most Christian primary and secondary students know more about Evolution than their counterparts in public schools, they just know how to discern the difference, based on their Christian beliefs. ;-)
20
posted on
08/12/2008 7:19:23 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(I was taught to respect my elders, but it's getting harder to find one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson