Posted on 08/08/2008 11:44:22 AM PDT by Shermy
ping
Anthrax : a REAL investigation tells another story (peer reviewed study published in 2007)
Grassley has been on a witchhunt against the FBI for many years. I understand he has, in some cases had a detrimental affect on some sensitive cases
Why?
They paid Hatfill so they wouldn’t have to answer these questions.
Wow. This is disgusting.
Everything about the way this investigation has been handled since Day 1 has been reprehensible.
“I understand he has, in some cases had a detrimental affect on some sensitive cases”
“Detrimental effect” - does that mean embarassment from incompetence being exposed?
I think people here could add numerous more questions.
For one, show us photos of the actual anthrax used in the attacks.
Two, state when Social Worker Duley first cooperated with the FBI.
Three, did Dr. David Irwin also cooperate with the FBI and starting when.
If Hatfill had committed suicide, the case would have been closed and pinned on him.
It looks like Ivins was more cooperative. It’s a little smelly.
That’s because the attack probably originated in Saddem’s Iraq and not in Maryland.
Between Muller and Hayden I'm starting to wonder, "Where's Larry?"
TR posted again yesterday the info how “Dugway” couldn’t reverse engineer the stuff over 18 months, etc. The recent news has Ivins’ superiors talking about “another” piece of equipment and that Ivins couldn’t have made it.
Got me thinking. What if the difficulties Dugway had in recreating the “process” was that the FBI restricted their research to use only equipment available at Ft. Detrick to Hatifll (or Ivins)? E.g., no use of a mill. IOW, the FBI was first interested in proving the stuff could have been made at Ft. Detrick?
How do officials believe Ivins made the anthrax? The FBI says Ivins used his lab to convert anthrax spores into powdered anthrax, but no proof has been presented that he had the equipment or the expertise to do so.
“I’m waiting for it to be shown that the quantity and the quality of the powders in the anthrax letters could have been produced in those suites” at Fort Detrick, said W. Russell Byrne, who retired from Fort Detrick in 2003 and was Ivins’ supervisor from 1998 to 2000. “I don’t know how to make the stuff,” he said.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-anthrax0807,0,4430001.story?track=rss
And we are supposed to believe them after all the other FBI Lab false results !!
How much has he had to pay out in settlements for his incompetence/corruption anyway? How many perfectly innocent people has he destroyed.
Amazing, isn’t it? Virtually all the real experts in the field say that this was the most incredible product they had ever seen, it was so sophisticated our government couldn’t even reproduce it, yet this one guy supposedly did it by himself in a few nights of overtime after 9/11.
That exactly right. That’s why this investigation has been completely politicized. Saddam’s WMD and terror ties are both confirmed if the truth ever gets out.
Ivins had as much to do with those attacks as you or I.
Answers, Shmanswers, can’t you recognize the spoken truth for what it is.
Dr. Ivins be da “anthrax” man.
At this why would ANYONE want to cover up any purported ties of anthrax to Saddam. Who benefits from that.
OTOH, who benefits from another lone gunman being nailed as the anthrax perp after 7 years of mystery?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.