GUN RIGHTS FOR FELONS?

NY Post ^ | July 22, 2008 | DON B. KATES

[neverdem]

Don Kates, a criminologist and a retired professor of constitutional and criminal law, is a fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif.

[GunsareOK]

I think felony (and domestic violence misdemeanor) disabilities should be removed IF the person subject to them has avoided further convictions for a number of years.

[Spok]

The felons who are so inclined will carry guns regardless, hence the necessity for the rest of us to do likewise.

[absolootezer0]

if they can’t be trusted with a gun and the right to vote, why aren’t they still in jail?

[Savage Texan]

“trivial felony”

Hmm, that seems like an oxymoron to me...

[The KG9 Kid]

Before the hysterical anti-gun people start screaming about the Heller decision allowing felons to have guns, remind them:

1. The majority decision covered this very issue right out of the starting gate.

2. The liberals who argued for the losing side on behalf of DC did say they believed that felons should have the right to claim protection under the 2nd Amendment.

3. So did the ACLU in their amicus brief, although they later came out with a public letter that said they disagreed with the US Supreme Court that held that the 2nd was an individual right. That means that although good people like you and I have no right to a gun, as the ACLU sees it, they believe that criminals can claim protected status under the 2nd when facing prosecution.

Any liberals trying to make the case of "SEE?! SEE?! The Supreme Court is putting guns in the hands of dangerous felons!" needs to reconcile these three points in their silly little heads before they launch into their hypocritical left wing outburst.

[HawaiianGecko]

I agree that it's a good thing to keep guns away from criminals, but it's still their constitutional right to own them.  Unless we strip citizenship away from felons and deport them, the 2nd amendment covers them too.  Especially since this latest USSC decision that specifically claimed it was an individual right, not the right of a militia. 

Until we amend the constitution to say we can have special classes of citizens, some with gun rights and some without, we are basically ignoring the 2nd amendment.  Oh, and good luck with that special class of citizen thingy.

[JRandomFreeper]

why aren’t they still in jail?

Or taking a dirt nap?

/johnny

[Graybeard58]

Arm incarcerated felons too, only put the guards on the outside of the prison.

Survival of the fittest.

[weegee]

Federal and state laws against convicted felons having guns are still valid: The Second Amendment protects a right of self-defense for "good" people only.

And I fail to see how this works.

There are plenty of non-violent felonies that do not involve any risk of subsequent gun crime.

Once a felon has served his term and is no under any probationary controls (as violent criminals could be sentenced) what does it do to prohibit him from owning a gun?

If felons are going to be permitted the right to vote and become parents, why are their gun rights limited?

[weegee]

Felons can vote in an increasing number of states. Democrats need every vote.

[kingu]

I think felony (and domestic violence misdemeanor) disabilities should be removed IF the person subject to them has avoided further convictions for a number of years.

Putting time on such things always worries me - after all, if someone spent 42 years in prison for murder, he'd probably meet your requirements for not having had any further convictions for a set number of years.

We have methods of expunging someone's record of serious crimes, it requires petitioning a court, or in some cases, the governor's office. The victims of these crimes had no such protections, so I'm more than willing to let it be.

[Gay State Conservative]

Nope...sorry.As much as I support the 2nd Amendment's provision for self defense there are certain people who,IMO,should ***not*** be allowed to possess firearms.

People with certain psychiatric diagnoses

People convicted of certain types/levels/categories of crime (e.g.,felonies).....

[marktwain]

Don Kates is the one of the people most responsible for the Heller decision. He started the project to write law reviews showing the truth about the 2nd amendment. He explicitly stated that the wanted to follow the same path that recognition of the First Amendment took with the Second Amendment.

Don Kates started the strategy that resulted in the Heller decision.

[CowboyJay]

"if they can’t be trusted with a gun and the right to vote, why aren’t they still in jail?"

So we can make room to imprison REAL criminals like potheads and DUI offenders.

[SeaHawkFan]

Legislatures can make almost anything a felony, and they do so to further the restrictions on the possession of firearms.

The recent Heller decision allows for “reasonable restrictions” on felons. The question now is what is reasonable. I would think that if a person does not use a firearm in a nonviolent crime, they should be able to possess firearms.

[SeaHawkFan]

Nope...sorry.As much as I support the 2nd Amendment's provision for self defense there are certain people who,IMO,should ***not*** be allowed to possess firearms. People with certain psychiatric diagnoses

If you had read the Heller decision, you would know there was a common law exception at the time the Constitution was adopted for mentally disturbed individuals, so the Heller decision does not change that exception.

[RightWingConspirator]

I think it depends also on the crime for which the felon was convicted. I don’t believe a a person convicted of a violent crime, such as armed robbery or murder, should ever have his gun rights restored.

[Bluestateredman]

What if a stupid kid gets busted for drunk driving one saturday night? Should he be banned from life from gun ownership? I find that ridiculous.

This kind of slippery slope is why the local police chiefs here in Mass. feel free to just deny gun permits to law abiding citizens for no reason whatsoever.

[sionnsar]

The felons who are so inclined will carry guns regardless, hence the necessity for the rest of us to do likewise.

Yup. We've seen how denying the right to carry legally does nothing to stop those so inclined, but how it sets in place legislation to impede purchases by those who've never been convicted -- background checks, waiting periods, restrictions on purchases per month and so on.

Might be better to let Teddy "the fish" and Bernhard Goetz own guns.

Might.