Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/09/2008 8:04:42 AM PDT by Raineygoodyear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Raineygoodyear
The Lib's ideal version of the First Amendment:

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech of people we like, or of the our allies in the press; or the right of the people we like peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

32 posted on 07/09/2008 8:26:10 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

Interesting lawsuit. Totally groundless, but an interesting concept.

Oh, Obama’s comments offended me. Maybe I can sue him.


33 posted on 07/09/2008 8:26:14 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Official FR PITA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

Seems like a 1st amendment case. But wait, Christians don’t get no steenking 1st amendment.


36 posted on 07/09/2008 8:28:48 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

S/he’d have a much better chance filing that suit in Canada.


42 posted on 07/09/2008 8:32:29 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (If it is going to take 10 years, shouldn't we get started? Drill here, drill now, pay less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear
OMG, the Hate™ literature also groups homosexuality with incest and bestiality! We haven't even begun to attempt to increase social approval of those activities! /sarc

There was one case in Canada in 2001, and one in America (Idaho, I think in 2004) where biblical verses were accepted by the courts as "hate literature" when placed in certain contexts. Hey, according to Supreme Court logic, those prior decisions constitute strong arguments in favor of criminalizing the bible.

44 posted on 07/09/2008 8:41:11 AM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

Is there still a First Amendment?


45 posted on 07/09/2008 8:47:57 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

He does make me chuckle. I have 2 Zondervan Bibles at home and one on the truck, I may just go buy another for the office.

Neal Boortz wrote a while back that losers leave the office at 5 and winners stay and get the work done. I left at 5 every day last week so I feel slighted anyone know a good lawyer?


46 posted on 07/09/2008 8:54:37 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear
Yesterday, a U.S. District Judge refused to appoint an attorney to represent Fowler in the Thomas Nelson case, saying the court "has some very genuine concerns about the nature and efficacy of these claims and
Case dismissed!
48 posted on 07/09/2008 9:03:55 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

“It’s version”?????Is this guy really dumb enough to think each publisher produces a Bible that says what the publisher wants it to say?


52 posted on 07/09/2008 9:09:32 AM PDT by Wiser now (Happiness is not an absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

Zondervan needs to file a counter-suit claiming discrimination! Homo-ism is cast as a sin in the Qur’an also! This idiot is only suing the Bible!


53 posted on 07/09/2008 9:20:36 AM PDT by Jerry Attrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear
Story from a local source, yesterday.
55 posted on 07/09/2008 9:23:45 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

..........in further news, Fowler is said to be contemplating legal action against a local supplier of door hardware. He claims to have been walking past the store recently, and upon looking through the window, noticed an employee polishing a knob. He claims the sight made him “uncomfortable”.


57 posted on 07/09/2008 9:35:08 AM PDT by weeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear
Would he sue the psychiatrists, who still know, homsexuality is as a mental disorder? In the 70's the American Psychiatric Association had their annual meeting in California. Activist gays demonstrated against the association. To quote one psychiatrist, who resigned from the American Psychiatric Association after they removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, "The next thing they'll say is schizophrenia is an alternate thought disorder."
58 posted on 07/09/2008 9:48:03 AM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

What audacity: the suit seeks to make the Bible illegal.


59 posted on 07/09/2008 9:52:20 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

Zondervan faces $60M federal lawsuit over Bible, homosexuality
WOOD TV Grand Rapids, MI | July 8, 2008 10:58 PM | Tony Tagliavia
Posted on 07/08/2008 8:27:57 PM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042753/posts


61 posted on 07/09/2008 9:59:16 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

He will have eternity to wish he had heeded the bible.


63 posted on 07/09/2008 10:22:34 AM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

He might as well sue Mohammed, too.


65 posted on 07/09/2008 10:35:48 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

It can only cause distress if he believes the source.

And if he believes the source, then he is a sinner with no grounds.


68 posted on 07/09/2008 11:55:18 AM PDT by NoLibZone (All Democrats must be rationed fuel to reduce their hypocrisy about global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear

I am going to sue too, there are a bunch of other guy’s wives I covet.


69 posted on 07/09/2008 1:41:56 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Raineygoodyear
Fowler, who is representing himself in both lawsuits

An attorney who represents himself as a fool for a client. I hope the defendant's attorney plays hardball and sanctions him.

$60 million for Emotional Distress due to other people's reactions based on this translation of the Bible? That doesn't make any sense from a logical or legal standpoint. I don't think this makes it to trial. I wouldn't take this case, and I have a rather libertarian standpoint when it comes to gay related issues.

71 posted on 07/10/2008 10:28:18 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson