Skip to comments.
Morality -- Trotskyite vs. Christian [It's Pat]
Townhall ^
| June 24, 2008
| Pat Buchanan
Posted on 06/24/2008 3:08:57 PM PDT by Alouette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Pat hits bottom, digs.
1
posted on
06/24/2008 3:08:58 PM PDT
by
Alouette
To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2ndDivisionVet; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; Aiko; ...
FReepMail to be added or removed from this pro-Israel/Judaic/Russian Jewry ping list.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
2
posted on
06/24/2008 3:09:26 PM PDT
by
Alouette
(Vicious Babushka)
To: Alouette
How come Pat does not mention the Nazi bombing of Rotterdam and Warsaw?
3
posted on
06/24/2008 3:10:23 PM PDT
by
C19fan
To: Alouette
PAt confuses debating with ingorant leftists and looking at history. Pat is revising history and assuming that we are all ignorant, again. And he is ascerbic to grow up and deal with an argument as anything but a personal attack.
4
posted on
06/24/2008 3:12:01 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
To: All
I voted for this idiot in 92... Big mistake..
5
posted on
06/24/2008 3:16:14 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Who is Obama's Puppet Master???)
To: Alouette
Pat hits bottom, digs. Pat's whole campaign for a revisionist rejection of our fighting WWII is just bizarre. Our bombing wasn't justified in light of Coventry, the East End, Warsaw, Rotterdam, etc.? Nonsense.
That said, the bombing effort produced checkered results, at best. The Brits couldn't hit much of anything of strategic value, bombing at night. U.S. losses from daylight bombing outweighed what value we got, at least until losses declined after we got fighter cover all the way to and from the target.
Research after the war showed rather than demoralize civilians, bombing tended to reinforce their resolve.
6
posted on
06/24/2008 3:18:19 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
To: Alouette; wideawake
Why did Pat call his article Trotskyite vs. Christian when he’s talking about Churchill’s England, Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia? Is it because he’d rather have a Jewish name representing Communism?
7
posted on
06/24/2008 3:19:14 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: rmlew; All
Pat and his fellow paleos is stuck in a time warp.. Mainly in the 30’s and the 50’s.. They need to stop living in the past and live in the present..
8
posted on
06/24/2008 3:23:25 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Who is Obama's Puppet Master???)
To: Alouette
Waiting for the sniveling PATrons to emerge from their sewers to defend him.....4....3....2....1....
9
posted on
06/24/2008 3:24:42 PM PDT
by
TrueKnightGalahad
(When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
To: Alouette
Not defending Buchanan, but Hitchens did leave himself open to a hell of a lot of criticism. Defeating Nazism and ending the Holocaust justified the Allied tactics in toto, beyond what would be the norm in ‘mundane warfare.’ But Hitch makes it sound as IF the raids were justified as punishment—not as a strategic objective.
10
posted on
06/24/2008 3:25:19 PM PDT
by
Natchez Hawk
(This is Sammy Israel III filling in for DB Cooper who will be returning next week,)
To: Alouette
War is all about success and if a tactic succeeds then it is justified. It’s all about survival and defeating the enemy. When the existence of your country and your people are on the line you don’t play by Marquis of Queensbury rules.
11
posted on
06/24/2008 3:25:51 PM PDT
by
elmer fudd
(Fukoku kyohei)
To: Alouette
After the war, a lone Senate voice arose to decry what was taking
place at Nuremberg as "victor's justice."
You just can't make some people happy.
It was a pretty herculean effort by the US and Brits to convince
the Soviets to have a trial and to document of the Nazis' offenses.
The Soviets just wanted to have the Nazis hung/shot.
12
posted on
06/24/2008 3:27:35 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Alouette
13
posted on
06/24/2008 3:28:13 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
To: C19fan
Or ....
To: Alouette
15
posted on
06/24/2008 3:36:17 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: KevinDavis
I voted for this idiot in 92... Big mistake.. Me to....sigh
16
posted on
06/24/2008 3:36:55 PM PDT
by
usurper
(Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
To: BenLurkin
Surely Mr. Buchanan knows that painting was inspired by a simple
“warm-up” by The Luftwaffe before “the big game”.
17
posted on
06/24/2008 3:37:53 PM PDT
by
VOA
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Alouette
I heard, decades ago that the initial British bombing of German cities was to divert the Luftwaffe from targeting the RADAR sites on the British coast ad hit other British targets instead. Cynical but logical. If you know where the planes are you can attack them effectively with a limited force. As far as so called terror bombings of German cities were concerned. It was strategically justified to kill people who could man German factories which perpetuated the German war machine. It seems, no matter what the allies did, the krauts could rebuild factories at an amazing pace. But you can't re animate dead workers. Morality has absolutely nothing to do with it.
19
posted on
06/24/2008 3:38:18 PM PDT
by
isrul
(Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
To: colorado tanker
“Our bombing wasn’t justified in light of Coventry, the East End, Warsaw, Rotterdam, etc.? Nonsense.”
As I recall, in WWI the belligerents gassed each other without too much moral outrage, but zepplins bombing cities was a great atrocity. In WWII the morality pretty much flipped 180 degrees.
OUR trouble here is that we’re giving Pat Buchanan WAY too much credibility by even listening to what he has to say.
20
posted on
06/24/2008 3:38:56 PM PDT
by
Owl558
("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson