Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

But Michael Levin, communications director for Waters, told Cybercast News Service on Friday that Waters did not mean what she said.

Translation: She didn't mean to be so obvious by spilling the beans.

"The Democrats in general do no support this idea," he said.

Yeah sure, no more than they support invading our homes by telling us which light bulbs we can and cannot use.


1 posted on 06/23/2008 3:19:03 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Man50D
It was not her intention to announce a big policy proposal. It's not a developed policy proposal. It was not an intentional statement

Basically Maxine, "Stepped on her Crank", since its not yet a developed policy.

There is no doubt though it is their plan.

2 posted on 06/23/2008 3:23:35 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
There was another Democrat-Socialist congress critter the next day on Fox who was asked about socializing oil. She said it sounded good to her. Hannity asked about automobile companies? Good to go. Pharmaceuticals, Hannity asked? Yes.

It's on tape.

yitbos

3 posted on 06/23/2008 3:24:47 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
"The Democrats in general do no support this idea," he said. "My guess is that neither Waters nor Hinchey really support this idea. They are ducking and covering and saying anything that might get people riled up." -Thomas Fiery, Policy Analyst at the Cato Institute

What a damn fool...

4 posted on 06/23/2008 3:26:13 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
but the republican nominee for president like the one soon to leave office just wants to play nice, make a commercial with this two as the face and plans of the democrats for our country, nah won't happen.
5 posted on 06/23/2008 3:26:21 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Nationalization is their plan, and has been their plan all along. Its just entering a new phase now: the phase where fringe elements have the go-ahead to float their trial balloons. Each float has the effect of cauterizing some small public segment, paving the way for the next float. Will an Obama POTUS actually do the nationalization? I don't know... that will be a tactical decision later, but he clearly will make giant leaps in many socialist directions.

This method of operandi, of pecking and pawing and occasional leaps, is the same used by the homo lobby: getting pokes at the subject thru the 1960's/70's in movies and books, more serious swings in schools and TV, significant jabs via the MA courts, and major thrusts by CA courts. And now a good portion of the public doing the bidding by their leftist votes.

7 posted on 06/23/2008 3:47:34 AM PDT by C210N (The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
What Mad Maxine really meant was that they would like to 'socialize' with the owners of the refineries to get to know them better.

[cue laugh track]
8 posted on 06/23/2008 3:49:41 AM PDT by mkjessup (Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

>>”This liberal will be all about socializing, uh, uh ... would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies.”<<

THE ACCIDENTAL TRUTH.


9 posted on 06/23/2008 3:52:01 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

“It was not her intention to announce a big policy proposal. It’s not a developed policy proposal. It was not an intentional statement.”

She just spilled the beans and blurted out the essence of the DhimmiRat LibTard ultimate goal...control. It has always been about control, and will forever be about control with these idiots.
They can’t point to a single Federal program that functions better under government control than under private control, with the exception of the military (and the Dems will never admit that), but they insist on taking more and more control over the lives of the citizenry.

It’s time to take back the country. These people will appease, apologize, PC and MultiCulti us right into oblivion.


10 posted on 06/23/2008 3:58:39 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The disadvantage of having politicians as stupid as Maxine Waters in your party is that they are too stupid to remember what the party cover story is while pushing the Left’s real agenda.


11 posted on 06/23/2008 3:59:37 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Or how many calories you are allowed to eat every day, which type of car you are allowed to buy and the setting on your home thermostat. Governmental overreach and loss of freedom is the hallmark of Dems.


13 posted on 06/23/2008 4:00:13 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
The congressional black commie caucus... mmmmm hmmm!

LLS

16 posted on 06/23/2008 4:32:15 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (REAGANISM... not communism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Communists! Plain and simple. Round them up and ship them out to the EU.


17 posted on 06/23/2008 4:32:27 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

News Service on Friday that Waters did not mean what she said

Funny how these liberals always are misquoted maybe they should just STFU.


18 posted on 06/23/2008 4:33:29 AM PDT by bikerman (_ _ . /_ _ _ /_ . . / / . . . . / . / . _ . . / . _ _ . / / . . _ / . . . //)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
But Michael Levin, communications director for Waters, told Cybercast News Service on Friday that Waters did not mean what she said.

"It was one comment in a long hearing, and it has continued to have a life of its own in the blogosphere," he said. "It was not her intention to announce a big policy proposal. It's not a developed policy proposal. It was not an intentional statement."

You don't say. Now tell me about your mother, Frau Waters.


19 posted on 06/23/2008 4:37:49 AM PDT by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

I told a liberal colleague that I was supportive of this idea, but only as a proof of concept. They should be allowed to purchase one old refinery and allowed to build one new refinery. After 5 or 10 years, we could then do a study and see whether they ran them better than the oil industry. He didn’t want anything to do with this idea. He knew that they would fail miserably.


20 posted on 06/23/2008 4:38:18 AM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Isn’t Maxine Waters the idiot who wanted the Mars lander camera to look for the American flag that was planted during the Apollo mission???? She thought that the United States had already accomplished a manned mission to Mars.


21 posted on 06/23/2008 4:55:52 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Maxine Waters said, meant with extreme sincerity.....SOCIALISM. No ifs, ands or buts. These people are running our government...


22 posted on 06/23/2008 5:01:23 AM PDT by Coffee200am
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Can’t you see oil execs spending $$ on exploration, new refineries, drilling equipment with that threat hanging over their head??

Maxine said what she meant.. twice.


23 posted on 06/23/2008 5:06:51 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

“She didn’t mean to be so obvious by spilling the beans.”

Exactly.


24 posted on 06/23/2008 5:08:25 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Didn’t poll well, huh?


26 posted on 06/23/2008 5:09:57 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson