Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MILITARY: Marine Corps appealing dismissal ruling for Chessani
North County Times ^ | June 18, 2008 | MARK WALKER

Posted on 06/18/2008 7:22:37 PM PDT by RedRover

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last
To: Lancey Howard

No it’s not a joke. If you hate President Bush then that’s your problem. So you think President Bush should have used undue command influence here, the very thing the prosecution did resulting in this case being thrown out. That about cover it?


61 posted on 06/18/2008 9:05:29 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

I’m glad you brought up Presidential Pardons. They never had the best reputation in town but after Clinton they now mean the person is guilty as anything but not a criminal anymore. IIRC even having one may not restore military benefits, just negate all convictions.


62 posted on 06/18/2008 9:15:24 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

What a day.


63 posted on 06/18/2008 9:16:00 PM PDT by lilycicero (Do you think that was really bigheadfred's pic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Murtha ought to be sued for harrassing a citizen of the United States.


64 posted on 06/18/2008 9:17:13 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
The last thing the President and on down the chain of command wants to give is the appearance of a cover up, even if the charges are total BS like they are here.

With respect, I'm fed up and out of patience with excuses for President Bush's constant failures of command and leadership. While cowering behind a "pretext" of not wanting to give "the appearance of a cover up" he has given us and, more importantly, these brave men for whom he was responsible and their families, the nightmare reality of being prosecuted/persecuted and their lives ruined simply for doing their duty.

I do believe if needed, President Bush would step in at the appropriate time. Right now he's let the legal system do it's job and up till now it's worked with this one.

Oh, it's "worked" alright. These men's lives and careers have been ruined and their families put through hell, both emotionally and financially. Even if they are all cleared eventually, that damage is irreversible. Worse than that, it's inexcusable, because everyone involved, including the prosecutors, the Marine Corps chain of command, Jack Murtha AND President Bush have known for a long time that this case was bogus, and that these men were operating properly under the rules of engagement.

Worst of all, this case, and the disgraceful spectacle of others of this type which the Bush administration has allowed to fester and refused to challenge in the court of public opinion have been devastating to the morale of our military and their families, and of immense aid and comfort to our enemies.

The moment Jack Murtha went on national television and publicly proclaimed that Marine generals had personally told him that these men committed "cold-blooded murder" President Bush had a responsibility to act. First he should have made a public condemnation of Murtha's prejudicial comments and demanded a public retraction and apology.

If Murtha refused, he next should have ordered both the military and the Justice Department to begin an investigation with a view to prosecution of either Murtha or the "generals". The logic is simple: either Murtha was lying, and thus tampering with and trying to influence an ongoing trial, or "certain generals" were in violation of the USMJC. Either way, those SOB's should have been the ones being hounded by the legal system...

This course of action would have provided President Bush with a perfect platform to use the bully pulpit to sell the American people on his war-time agenda and to put our "enemies domestic" on the defensive. Instead he passively sat back, allowed our enemies to frame the debate, and to his eternal shame, left those servicemen who looked to him for leadership twisting in the wind...

It is my hope that these men will all be ultimately cleared. Unfortunately, I believe that unlikely because the government's agenda is not justice at all. Moreover, others not so well connected, in other similar cases, have not escaped the corrupt military justice system.

And again, worst of all, these cases should not have happened at all...

65 posted on 06/18/2008 9:26:59 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

This is the fault of the Marine “leadership”—Mattis and the last two Commandants. These vile excuses for officers put their sorry careers before loyalty to their subordinates. Moral cowards, they allowed themselves to be bullied by Murtha, the MSM and other traitors. An appalling
vista.
66 posted on 06/18/2008 9:29:52 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I forgot to add that if the prosecutors keep this malarkey going it could eventually end up in the President’s hands through the legal system. If it does and he doesn’t smack down the people who are attacking our troops hard then I’ll agree with you.

I hope you're right, but I doubt it... Go talk to Scooter Libbey about how well Bush defends his people...

67 posted on 06/18/2008 9:30:15 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
That about cover it?

Get a grip.

First, I don't "hate" Bush and in fact proudly voted for the man twice. But I still believe that his handing over of the prosecution of the war to to a pack of ACLU lawyers and soft, military political hacks is disgraceful.

Second, the Commander-in-Chief, by definition, cannot use "undue command influence" - - he's the guy at the top of the heap and he can pick up the frigging phone any time he finally gets a clue and end this disgusting railroad job, instantly.

68 posted on 06/18/2008 9:31:10 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
Murtha wasn't and isn't in the chain of command, President Bush is. Trying to remember my dumb airman legal briefing from decades ago but I do remember that at some point military appeals could end up on the Presidents desk. He is a potential direct part of these proceedings and has to act accordingly. I'm sure President Bush has been advised of this. Any public statement in this case at all by President Bush would be construed as undue influence until this is all resolved.
69 posted on 06/18/2008 9:37:42 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Correct that President Bush could have picked up the phone and stopped this anytime he wanted. Then those men would have still went through tons of hassles and had this following them around for the rest of their lives. It would always be said that “ Daddy Bush saved them but they’re still monsters.” Now most have been cleared by the courts the best result they can get out of this.


70 posted on 06/18/2008 9:49:46 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
I resent the Remark that Bush should have stopped this because that would have been as grievous as command influence as has happened here perhaps maybe even more so.

You need to read more carefully - nowhere did I say President Bush "should have stopped this" or interfered with the proceedings. However, it was his duty to stop Murtha et al. from interfering with those proceedings as well.

What I said is that he should have stepped up and defended his troops (and coincidentally, the rule of law) by challenging Murtha's totally out-of-line public pronouncements and by investigating Murtha and his alleged general's comments.

Murtha's actions were on public television, not on the floor of the House, and he has no Congressional immunity for such blatant attempts to interfere with and prejudice an ongoing investigation and trial. Murtha is not above the law, and neither are these alleged generals.

If either of these parties did as claimed it would have been perfectly appropriate for Bush to go after them legally.

Even better, it would have also been good politics...

Best of all, it would have been the right moral and ethical thing to do...

71 posted on 06/18/2008 9:50:41 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: lilycicero

Yes, what a day it was! I am still shaking my head, banging it against the wall, etc. But, having seen Sullivan “in action” I am not surprised that the appeal happened. He is one mean son of a bit## with an ego to match who hates to lose and will do anything to try to “save his axx!”


72 posted on 06/18/2008 9:52:15 PM PDT by Semper Fi Mom (Mother of a Marine and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

The point is that this idiotic charade should never have even gotten off the ground in the first place... But because military and civilian commanders right on up the chain of command ran like cowards from a frigging TIME Magazine story that was planted by insurgent propagandists with the help of an incompetent, deer-in-the-headlights “reporter”, the terrorists have achieved a victory - - eight heroic Marines have been permanently removed from the field of battle.

And the buck stops at Dubya’s desk.


73 posted on 06/18/2008 9:57:27 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Semper Fi Mom
"Hey Sullivan, you pathetic loser...."


74 posted on 06/18/2008 9:59:55 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I won’t be happy until charges are preferred on Murtha!


75 posted on 06/18/2008 10:00:55 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

It may be, as someone has peculated, the Murtha has the brass running scared. After all, he intimidates not only his own party but many Republicans who seek earmarks.


76 posted on 06/18/2008 10:03:19 PM PDT by RobbyS (Ecce homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

Murtha will pay for his remarks and already is. He has been seriously challenged ever since he made them in the last election as well as this one.

No! I say that the president standing up and defending these Marines before this case is over, is most certainly undo command influence. If he had I would venture to say that several convictions would had to have happened just to prove his influence didn’t taint these trials.

President Bush did the right thing, in matters of military justice he must remain aloft and seemingly uncaring, I don’t like it, but I understand the need for it to be that way.


77 posted on 06/18/2008 10:06:44 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They’ve lost control of the situation and as a result one of the most powerful members of congress has egg all over his face. If the Republicans weren’t cowards, they could help run Murtha out of Congress.


78 posted on 06/18/2008 10:07:24 PM PDT by RobbyS (Ecce homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Murtha wasn't and isn't in the chain of command, President Bush is...

Irrelevant. I'm not talking about "undue command influence", I'm talking about political and public relations warfare, in which the Bush administration has been woefully inept.

Any public statement in this case at all by President Bush would be construed as undue influence until this is all resolved.

That's simply nonsense. It all depends on exactly what the President says. Specifically, while it would have been inappropriate for the President to speculate on the guilt or innocence of those charged, it would have been completely appropriate for him to publicly condemn Murtha for doing precisely that. You need to reread my post.

79 posted on 06/18/2008 10:10:04 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

Nor I, HS and it ‘s exactly what should be done but I doubt it’ll happen. He’s been avoiding charges by the skin of his teeth for neatly 30 years.


80 posted on 06/18/2008 10:10:18 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson