Skip to comments.
“White Paper” rips Tanker Award
Leeham News and Comment ^
| May 29, 2008
| leehamnet
Posted on 05/30/2008 9:48:40 AM PDT by MHalblaub
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
"White paper" http://sev.prnewswire.com/aerospace-defense/20080529/DC2379729052008-1.html
1
posted on
05/30/2008 9:48:41 AM PDT
by
MHalblaub
To: MHalblaub
Duncan Hunter and Maria Cantwell will get to the bottom of this!!!!
2
posted on
05/30/2008 9:54:54 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Four years of Carter gave us 29 years of Iran; What will Hilabama give us?)
To: MHalblaub
I question Boeing's patriotism.
If Boeing really cared about the United States instead of its own pocketbook, they would have lowered the price and won the contract.
Seems patriotism is fine with them as long as it makes their wallet fatter.
Given all that the United States has done for them, in terms of wealth building, giving them loads of tax dollars and protecting their freedoms, I'd say that, if Boeing REALLY believed in being patriotic, they'd be giving tankers away to the US military for free.
3
posted on
05/30/2008 9:56:15 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: MHalblaub
I use white paper every day when I am sitting on my throne.
4
posted on
05/30/2008 9:56:38 AM PDT
by
richardtavor
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
To: MHalblaub
Just what our troops need-—a French war plane. I wonder does it come with a free surrender flag?
THERE IS NO WAY MY TAX MONEY SHOULD BE USED TO BUY FRENCH ANYTHING MUCH LESS AN AIRFORCE TANKER!
To: MHalblaub
John McCain : “This is an outrage . I massaged this EADS deal myself . Everybody else is corrupt , corrupt I tell you and unpatriotic . Those damn Boeings , junk and corrupt . B-17 junk and corrupt , hereinafter j&c ,B-29 , B-47 , B-52 , kc-135 , 707 , 727,737, 747 , 767, 777 and all the variants are j&c . As if it were not bad enough that the Boeing stockholders are corrupt , unpatriotic profiteers , I have further evidence Boeing employees were working for wages not patriotism.”
6
posted on
05/30/2008 10:16:45 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: richardtavor
They are pissed off that Northrop employees refuse to be unionized period!
To: MHalblaub
Does anyone remember the Airforce asking for fly over permission from France and being made to extend the mission by hours and hours because we were told to stay out of French airspace?
And now they want us to buy war planes for them, no thanks.
To: southernerwithanattitude
And now they want us to buy war planes for them, no thanks. Boeing has behaved badly, but I still find this decision hard to defend. As you point out, France has several times forbidden us to fly missions through their airspace. What happens down the line when they refuse to provide us with planes because they don't approve of some other mission?
Our government used to understand that you are at risk if you rely on other countries for critical war materials. So we built stockpiles. Now we've not only run down the stockpiles, but we rely on other countries for damned near everything--even many of our computers, made in Malaysia.
9
posted on
05/30/2008 10:30:45 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: mc6809e
"I question Boeing's patriotism...
Given all that the United States has done for them, in terms of wealth building, giving them loads of tax dollars and protecting their freedoms, I'd say that, if Boeing REALLY believed in being patriotic, they'd be giving tankers away to the US military for free."I question your lack of a sarcasm tag.
(Norton 9668P)
10
posted on
05/30/2008 10:40:35 AM PDT
by
norton
To: Cicero
I don’t care who builds these planes as long as it is an American company. Of all the countries in the world France is the LAST country that I would by military goods from!
To: norton
I question your lack of a sarcasm tag. Yeah, well it wasn't sarcasm.
If an American corporation can't compete with a European corporation, then the problem is with the American corporation.
I don't believe in welfare for slackers. The problem is with Boeing.
12
posted on
05/30/2008 11:26:13 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: norton
I question your lack of a sarcasm tag. Yeah, well it wasn't sarcasm.
If an American corporation can't compete with a European corporation, then the problem is with the American corporation.
I don't believe in welfare for slackers. The problem is with Boeing.
13
posted on
05/30/2008 11:26:27 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: mc6809e
The problem is with Boeing I hope Maxine Waters socializes them ./sarc sarc sarc sarc
14
posted on
05/30/2008 11:49:38 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: southernerwithanattitude; Yo-Yo
“THERE IS NO WAY MY TAX MONEY SHOULD BE USED TO BUY FRENCH ANYTHING MUCH LESS AN AIRFORCE TANKER!” Did you know engines used on current KC-135 fleet are build with almost 50 % French content?
15
posted on
05/30/2008 11:53:44 AM PDT
by
MHalblaub
("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
To: mc6809e
Ouch. Boeing’s profit margin is already only 6.5% as it is.
When they go bankrupt, the whole company’s jobs will be lost.
To: mc6809e
Seems patriotism is fine with them as long as it makes their wallet fatter.
Last I checked the US was not a part of the USSR.
17
posted on
05/30/2008 12:13:07 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Ouch. Boeings profit margin is already only 6.5% as it is. When they go bankrupt, the whole companys jobs will be lost. So what's the problem with them, then? They over-charge on tankers and still are only making 6.5%?
Someone is taking home more tax money than they deserve.
Let me guess: I bet it's Boeing labor that expects the rest of the country to do it's patriotic duty to make their wallets fatter.
For the good of the country, of course.
18
posted on
05/30/2008 12:16:03 PM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: Cicero
What happens down the line when they refuse to provide us with planes because they don't approve of some other mission?
No problem. They are being built in Alabama. If Northrop's partner breaks the contract then they will just get someone else to supply them with parts.
19
posted on
05/30/2008 12:16:21 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: mc6809e
Plus boeing lost 4 out of 5 performance factors to the winner.
20
posted on
05/30/2008 12:39:19 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(b.hussein)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson