Fortunately there are no reports of injuries. It's a good thing this was a cargo aircraft.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Paleo Conservative
God must have a plan for that crew.
46 posted on
05/25/2008 10:39:00 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(I want a woman POTUS like Elizabeth I in that last movie.....that is a she I could vote for. Balls)
To: Paleo Conservative
A “Did we pay our insurance premium this month” moment.
To: Paleo Conservative
Boileau did not know if the accident happened during take off or landing,"We see from the large tracks on the runway that the pilot tried to stop the aircraft, because he understood he could not bring it up into the air, and he drove it off the runway," Boileau said.
Looks like Boileau has trouble making up his mind.
59 posted on
05/25/2008 12:24:49 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: Paleo Conservative
Wonder who’s the MRO for Kalitta Air on this one?
65 posted on
05/25/2008 5:11:04 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
To: Paleo Conservative
>>Jan Van der Cruysse, spokesman at the airport. “The plane is very seriously damaged,”<<
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=192746fb-481e-402c-8460-8754ad602c77&
Maybe the plane was already airborne and hit the runway again. Allowed maximum landing weight is about 100 tonnes less than MTOW.
The picture looks to me like the undercarriage still supports the tail section but the fueled wing section was to heavy for that little jump.
69 posted on
05/26/2008 3:17:57 AM PDT by
MHalblaub
("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
To: Paleo Conservative
71 posted on
05/28/2008 9:09:10 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson