Posted on 05/25/2008 9:24:02 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
At Least, It’s Center Fuel Tank didn’t detonate as Clintoonistas ridiculously declared on the TWA 800 Terror Attack..:-(
Probably just converting meters to yards from a wire story for the local readers.
I used to watch Thursday Night Thunder, a live racing program usually on a dirt track. I think Doug Kalitta was one of the regulars there. Jeff Gordon also was also a regular before he graduated to NASCAR.
Loved the program. It had everything but the smell of rubber burning. Then one night one of the racers had an awful crash, and the announcers had to fill in about an hour and a half whilst they swept up the guy. It was no worse than a rain delay in baseball, but the program shortly thereafter went to tape, and then disappeared from the TV entirely.
Blown engine? I was once on a plane whose middle engine apparently self-destructed shortly after takeoff. There was a boom and the entire plane shook - a minute or so later I realized we were no longer climbing. Then the captain came on the PA.
Wonder who’s the MRO for Kalitta Air on this one?
What’s the big deal?
A little Bondo, 20-30 minutes on the frame machine.....
Seriously, is (was) it a 747SP or does it just look that way because it is now “compressed?”
After they duct tape that pup back together like nothin’ ever happened, they can trade it in on somethin’ smaller, more fuel efficient, and therefore more “green”.
WD-40 is nothing but kerosene and perfume in an aersol dispenser and it's a good product.
But PB Blaster Penetrating Catalyst is THE BEST ALL-PURPOSE WUNDER JUICE EVER MADE
(See all Blaster products here)
>>Jan Van der Cruysse, spokesman at the airport. “The plane is very seriously damaged,”<<
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=192746fb-481e-402c-8460-8754ad602c77&
Maybe the plane was already airborne and hit the runway again. Allowed maximum landing weight is about 100 tonnes less than MTOW.
The picture looks to me like the undercarriage still supports the tail section but the fueled wing section was to heavy for that little jump.
You laugh—my father-in-law used duct tape on a wing that he ripped on a barbed wire fence when taxiing at Famoso. Taped it up and flew it home.
Airplanes are not "full of fuel" on landing!
Every gallon of fuel not used on the flight is 7 lbs. of cargo they could have made money carrying. Also, the extra gross weight is hard on airframe and brakes when landing."
Actually, many times planes are full of fuel on landing. It's called fuel tankering. If fuel is cheaper at your origin than it is at your destination, it can be economical to carry that extra fuel. There are calculations done to determine the "break point", but I won't go into that here... ;o)
For example, flying from the Middle East where the stuff is extremely cheap to Europe, where it costs MUCH more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.