Posted on 05/17/2008 9:14:23 AM PDT by Bob J
Thank you for that well articulated clarification./s
I’m not the one making such claims.
IOW, you know I’m right and just wanted to chat. You should have said so.
“IOW, you know I’m right and just wanted to chat. “
Oh good. In declaring your statement to be right, perhaps you could support your assertion by responding to the following questions regarding your statement:
For example, regarding the Fairness Doctrine, Obama say that he will “clarify the public interest obligations of broadcasters who occupy the nation’s spectrum.” Since you are aware of his positions on these issues, along with McCain’s positions, do you know what Obama means by this statement? What is McCain’s stance on the fairness doctrine? Regarding global warming, what are McCain’s reservations relating to the Kyoto treaty, in comparison with Obama’s reservations? Does Obama have any reservations relating to this treaty?
There are several reasons why I might not respond to a post.
1. There isn’t a question in there, just a homily.
2. It’s already been said and asked before.
3. The question/comment is too ignorant for a response.
4. The question answers itself.
5. It’s not a genuine question, only a sugegstion for a sandbox fight.
6. I don’t have time to respond to every comment.
Take your pick.
You’re too intellectually lazy to even check someones profile. That kind of laziness deserves to be met with silence.
I love it when the newbies show up and start calling anyone who disagrees with them a “troll”. I just sit back and laugh at them.
If you get any kind of a thoughtful, well reasoned response from any of them except doughtyone, I’ll give you a dollar.
“In declaring your statement to be right”
My statement is my opinion, and therefore you can disagree with it, hold a different opinion or even call me stupid, but as it is MY opinion, it cannot be wrong.
“For example, regarding the Fairness Doctrine”
This was not part of the list of issues that I posted. If you wish to discuss that which I posted, then we can continue the conversation. Otherwise, good day to you.
I’d give you a dollar if you respond to post 6.
Elitist trolling is still trolling. Knock it off.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2017739/posts
Please send that dollar to Jim Robinson to help support this site...something I have a feeling you have never done before.
Saying you haven’t been here long enough to understand this site after you make an ignorant newbie statement is not elitest trolling, it’s arrogance thumping.
And what statement would that be? You’ve yet to actually dispute anything I’ve said. All you’re able to spew is smug elitist garbage about one’s intelligence or length of time spent at a website(I mean really? Newb? That’s your brilliant attack?)
Anyway, this is a waste of my time. And probably yours too. I’ve got other McCain threads to dispell myths and lies in.
Good point.
The Fairness doctrine has no relevance to political free speech? OK, I’ll let you eat your waffle.
I appreciate your posting McCain’s positions on various issues.
On this issue, I would like to know where he’s been as our military recruiters and centers have been under literal attack by radical leftists.
To my knowledge, he’s been silent and has done nothing to stand up for them here at home while they defend us both here and abroad.
Michelle Malkin has done a good job of chronicling what they’ve been subjected to:
Clinton and Obama probably silently cheer but I’m very disappointed in President Bush and Senator McCain on this as well.
I’d be very happy if someone could point me to any investigations initiated, statements issued, or actions taken by either against those who are assaulting our military here at home.
“The Fairness doctrine has no relevance to political free speech? OK, I’ll let you eat your waffle.”
I am so sorry for you, I was referring to McCain/Feingold. You know, that abomination that directly attacked the United States Constitution?
And Obama’s position regarding this, and the other issues you listed? I’ll assume you are unwilling to discuss Obama’s various positions on any given issue. Besides, you should probably not be surfing the internet so much. Computer monitors suck up lots of juice. You can’t spend this much time in front of a computer and just expect that other countries are going to say OK.
“I’ll assume you are unwilling to discuss Obama’s various positions on any given issue.”
I do not vote for any candidate because the other side is worse. All that has done so far in practice is allowed the continual leftward slide of the Republican Party.
Besides, you should probably not be surfing the internet so much. Computer monitors suck up lots of juice. You can’t spend this much time in front of a computer and just expect that other countries are going to say OK.”
I freely admit that I have no clue what that was supposed to mean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.