Skip to comments.
Why The 2009 Camaro Is Doomed
NMA ^
| 5/16/08
| Eric Peters
Posted on 05/16/2008 1:18:43 PM PDT by XR7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: XR7
So, I guess a big-block version is out of the question? Curious post from a poster with a Ford trim level as a screen name.
21
posted on
05/16/2008 1:46:45 PM PDT
by
j_tull
(Massachusetts, the Gay State. Once leader of the American Revolution, now leading its demise.)
To: XR7
22
posted on
05/16/2008 1:48:05 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
To: XR7
Remember that unlike Challenger (which is "spun off" the existing Charger sedan) GM has had to invest a great deal in what amounts to a brand-new platform/tooling and so on to make this happen. Big sales are needed to make it up. It increasingly looks as though that is extremely unlikely to happen. Bull. The Camaro is based on the Australia Holden Zeta RWD platform.
Regardless of what GM decides to do about the Camaro in the US, the Zeta rear wheel drive platform is going to be built for the European and Australian markets, so the platform costs for the Camaro is in sheet metal.
Motor Trend: GM Rationalizes Rear Drive: Sigma and Zeta architectures to be converged, Impala likely to stay FWD
23
posted on
05/16/2008 1:51:41 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: XR7
I can’t believe nobody’s posted “this thread is useless without pictures” yet...
24
posted on
05/16/2008 1:55:32 PM PDT
by
Hoffer Rand
(0bambi: the audacity of hype)
To: XR7
25
posted on
05/16/2008 1:55:42 PM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Centurion2000
At least the last batch had VW engines..
26
posted on
05/16/2008 1:56:39 PM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
I think Chevrolet should simply come out with a fairly conventional but lightweight 9/10 scale replica of a 57 Chevy
How do you make a 9/10 scale version when the modern Americans are at least 10/9 scale?
My '94 Caprice Wagon has a 350 V-8 and seats 8-9. It gets 26 hwy. When mostly full, it is a better value than a 4 seater econobox (because you would need to drive TWO of them).
27
posted on
05/16/2008 1:57:49 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
To: XR7
With all of this sort of bull coming down the pikeI don’t think I’ll be buying any new cars. I have a ‘98 firebird v6 I’m looking to bolt a supercharger to (anyone out there selling one?). I’ll make do with that. Off the line it’ll probably do a shade better than the factory V8 (300HP). Can’t imagine what it’ll sound like though, a little angry and hollow I’d imagine.
28
posted on
05/16/2008 2:01:07 PM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: Red Badger
1993 red Mustang LX convertible 4 cyl. 2.3L. People laughed when I bought it for my son two years ago. “Secretary car,” one punk told me to my face! Ha ha ha ha ha! Who’s laughing now? All the chicks know is that it’s a Mustang convertible! I know it gets 30 mpg hwy and 22 city.
29
posted on
05/16/2008 2:02:06 PM PDT
by
duckworth
(Perhaps instant karma's going to get you. Perhaps not.)
To: Disambiguator
Well, I don’t know about his predictions but I’m driving a thirty year old truck that gets LESS than 15mpg and while it’s a pinch for me it’s what I have.
Any less than thirty something who has a decent job today should be able to afford to drive a Camaro if they want...
30
posted on
05/16/2008 2:03:08 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Yo-Yo
There are plenty of people who don’t care about gas mileage.
Should be enough to keep the gas guzzlers going in niche markets where they won’t hurt CAFE much.
The Challenger currently only has a 5 speed auto.
The Viper 8.4L V10 with the 6 speed manual gets 22mpg on the highway. So the Challenger will probably better that with a 6 speed manual.
31
posted on
05/16/2008 2:03:48 PM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: Yo-Yo
Laying down rubber with a front wheel drive car is just plain wrong.
32
posted on
05/16/2008 2:04:30 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(I don't think outside the box. There is no box in my world.)
To: XR7

"Cold dead hands baby..."
To: Yo-Yo
not only is what you said in support of him slinging bull, but he has no clue when he mentioned the guzzler tax.......I train product knowlege for Chevy at times thru the southwest......that guzzler assumption ain’t making an as outta me
34
posted on
05/16/2008 2:05:30 PM PDT
by
advertising guy
(McMedia, McLettuce,McCain,.................... Mcmakes me wanna puke)
To: XR7
1982 Camaro 2.2L 4 cylinder 3 speed.
wow
35
posted on
05/16/2008 2:05:38 PM PDT
by
evets
(I have a crush on Hillary.)
To: XR7
I suppose the Bugatti, the Lamborghini, and the Ferrari will become illegal to own in the US?
To: XR7
Trust me. With both political parties embracing global warming hysteria to buy votes and this ridiculous 35mpg standard, the Corvette ZR1 is going to be the last american muscle car ever made. Take a look at it. Its the last of american automotive greatness.

Everyone go out and buy a prius and forget about freedom of choice. America no longer stands for such things.
37
posted on
05/16/2008 2:16:37 PM PDT
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: astounded
...”Those of us who still have jobs and have been able to maintain the same income we had a year or so ago are few, thankful — and nervous.”...
Thats the line that jumped out at me too...
A little odd I guess to go on a car thread and the first thing I see is the political bias of the author...but I guess that is what we do here eh?
As to the Camaro or the Mustang or any current production muscle car...My mpg should be none of the govments d@mn bidness...If I can afford the gas I should be able to buy whatever I want...
Market forces will dictate the success or failure of these cars...they should not be essentially outlawed by govment fiat..Just a glance at the current market for suv's vs econocars should make that pretty clear...
To: evets
"1982 Camaro 2.2L 4 cylinder 3 speed. wow"
zero to sixty in . . . < checking calendar > . . .
39
posted on
05/16/2008 2:27:27 PM PDT
by
stompk
To: XR7
The article implies that all cars by 2012 must get 35 mpg. This is far from the truth. The fuel economy bill requires that manufacturers must meet an average fleet (all cars sold) fuel economy of 35 mpg.
40
posted on
05/16/2008 2:41:17 PM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson