Skip to comments.
Election 2008: Kansas Presidential Election Kansas: McCain 55% Obama 34%
Rasmussen ^
| May 15, 2008
| Scott Rasmussen
Posted on 05/15/2008 8:07:14 PM PDT by Red Steel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
05/15/2008 8:07:14 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
If McCain couldn’t carry Kansas, he should give up his campaign completely.
2
posted on
05/15/2008 8:08:24 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Concerned about the price of arugula)
To: popdonnelly
The question when looking at these polls is whether you subtract 5% or 10% from the Obama total. Polls a pretty worthless when there is a black candidate. Many Americans lie and say they are voting for the black guy to get pollster approval.
3
posted on
05/15/2008 8:10:24 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: popdonnelly
toto could carry kansas by a higher margin
4
posted on
05/15/2008 8:11:12 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: popdonnelly
5
posted on
05/15/2008 8:16:20 PM PDT
by
Huck
("Real" conservatives support OBAMA in 08 (that's how you know Im not a real conservative))
To: Huck
6
posted on
05/15/2008 8:24:37 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Concerned about the price of arugula)
To: Red Steel
Election 2008: Kansas Presidential Election Kansas: McCain 55% Obama 34% Wow! At this point in the race, the media normally has the GOP nominee trailing significantly amongst even his immediate family.
7
posted on
05/15/2008 8:32:33 PM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(Simple-minded conservative...)
To: Onelifetogive
Yea no kidding, I keep waiting to hear that McCain’s wife registerd Democrat and is going to donate all her fortune to the chosen one who is to lead us out of wilderness.
8
posted on
05/15/2008 9:03:22 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
To: Red Steel
I’ve said that McCain can beat Obama hands down. Not many Republicans can’t beat Obama. It just happens to be his turn.
The only one that can beat McCain is McCain. And that stands a good chance of happening.
9
posted on
05/15/2008 9:07:46 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Ted Kennedy - Codename -> "Bobber")
To: Onelifetogive
In some of the other polls from Rasmussen, McCain is ahead of Obama in Georgia (53%-39%), Wisconsin (47%-43%), Michigan (45%-44%), Virginia (47%-44%), North Carolina (48%-45%), and Arkansas (57%-33%), and barely trails him in Iowa (42%-44%).
I know that McCain has a number of faults, but I'd much rather have him sitting in the Oval Office than Obama or Hitlery.
10
posted on
05/15/2008 9:15:31 PM PDT
by
Stonewall Jackson
(Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory. - George Patton)
To: TitansAFC; meandog; onyx; MARTIAL MONK; Kuksool; freespirited; Salvation; furquhart; mossyoaks; ...
There goes Obama's birth state. (He-he)
The McCain List.
11
posted on
05/15/2008 9:45:13 PM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: Red Steel
“What’s the Matter with Kansas?”
12
posted on
05/15/2008 9:54:58 PM PDT
by
lkco
(Go Dino!)
To: Stonewall Jackson
Iowa? When did it turn liberal?
13
posted on
05/15/2008 10:34:13 PM PDT
by
Cedar
To: Onelifetogive
14
posted on
05/15/2008 11:03:02 PM PDT
by
ncalburt
To: Cedar
I just talked to someone last night from Iowa, who said it’s the economy and healthcare problems.
15
posted on
05/15/2008 11:07:15 PM PDT
by
JavaJumpy
(Let's have a whinefest, shall we? Mark Levin)
To: JavaJumpy
Hmm...ok. I guess free health care is a big draw for the Democrats. As for the economy, I’m surprised they would think the Dems could do any better.
But doesn’t Iowa still care about moral issues? Right vs. wrong?
16
posted on
05/15/2008 11:22:53 PM PDT
by
Cedar
To: Cedar
For quite a time . A large exodus to the south left a only a bunch of the Dem welfare crowd left in IA.
17
posted on
05/15/2008 11:34:37 PM PDT
by
ncalburt
To: Huck
McCain CAN win. If he doesn’t rip the face of his would be supporters in a fit of bipartisanship.
18
posted on
05/16/2008 2:16:57 AM PDT
by
stravinskyrules
(Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
To: ncalburt
Iowa seemed to turn left in the mid 1980s. Of course they always elected Demo senators while usually going Republican for president. Then in ‘84 they picked Mao loving Tom Harkin for US senator so that’s when I knew they were going down the drain. Supposedly Dukakis carried the state in ‘88 because of the bad farm economy. As I recall President Reagan’s margin was not that large there in 1984, even as he was romping in places like CT and NJ.
19
posted on
05/16/2008 6:48:31 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
To: stravinskyrules
How sad that abortion loving Gov Sebelius gets high marks. I would almost like to see Obama pick her as a running mate just so they would then lose the state of the vice presidential candidate. Just like Kerry/Edwards losing NC by a wide margin last time.
20
posted on
05/16/2008 6:50:43 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson