Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Candidates Dodge Offshore Drilling
Barron's ^ | May 12, 2008 | Jim McTague

Posted on 05/10/2008 7:10:19 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: tractorman

“The price of oil would drop instantly if the President would declare through executive order the lifting of all restrictions on domestic drilling and refining. And then do it.”

I don’t know if he can do that by executive order.

But the President has the power of Pardon. He could pardon all oil companies for past, present or future drilling activities. I think he could apply this to both civil and criminal issues.

I am not sure, but is there any Constitutional scholars here on FR who think otherwise?


21 posted on 05/10/2008 7:36:53 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Idiocracy.

Gads, you're right! That movie was funny because of its basis in truth.

22 posted on 05/10/2008 7:38:35 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Yeah that’s a great reason not to drill, because it will “take years.”

Like time stand still, and by the time those wells are producing, all of humanity will be long gone.


23 posted on 05/10/2008 7:40:07 AM PDT by Spouting Horn (Terrorism is a tactic. The battle's against Shariah and Jihad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Funny you bought up that movie. I thought the same thing, this is a liberals dream.


24 posted on 05/10/2008 7:52:18 AM PDT by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Spouting Horn

If Bush wasn’t the traitor I know him to be, he’d tell the Sierra Club and all other orgs that oppose building refineries to take a hike and would sign an executive order directing the building of refineries all over the U.S. though preferably near ports. The Feds could then sell these refineries to private companies.


25 posted on 05/10/2008 7:53:00 AM PDT by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Spouting Horn

The wealthy of Florida and California don’t care if gas goes up..it just eliminates some of the traffic that gets in their way. They are also invested in oil companies and firms that profit from higher prices(and could profit from drilling in US waters).
Then there are lot of good people who still believe that drilling and production and transportation of oil will spoil their enviroment..even people who have worked in the industry but now live in Florida or CA.
It will take even higher prices for the ordinary people to rise up and demand more drilling. Perhaps when they see their new utility bills for their new 3500 ft home in the snowbelt..and their 20 mile commute in winter is costing them already.
Brazil went from desperately using ethanol to asking to join OPEC because they started using the best technology offshore and struck it rich.


26 posted on 05/10/2008 7:54:09 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
And wealthy Californians, some of whom own property overlooking the oil-rich Santa Barbara Channel, are never slow to underwrite the costs of presidential campaigns.

It's a simple problem of aesthetics.

Design the oil rigs to look like a crack pipe and these people will be perfectly happy.

27 posted on 05/10/2008 7:54:18 AM PDT by evad (.I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tractorman

The price of oil would drop instantly if the President would declare through executive order the lifting of all restrictions on domestic drilling and refining. And then do it.
____________________________________________________________

He’s not going to do it, nor would McCain, Clinton or Obama.


28 posted on 05/10/2008 8:13:12 AM PDT by fallingwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
“Too little too late to avert the present shortage”

There's no shortage of oil only, refineries.

29 posted on 05/10/2008 8:22:34 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
In PA, with some exceptions, the elected Republicans vote like Democrats and even if the congressional seats change hands, the voting records are pretty much the same. With Santorum gone, we might as well have 2 Democrat Senators (which we no doubt will after '10.)

In PA, the Republican party is the the other wing of the Republicrat party, so there is no support in either party for a conservative politician and most are sell-outs before they ever get to D.C. Do they care about the country? Hell, no. They represent THEMSELVES and THEIR interests. Do they belong in Congress? NO.

30 posted on 05/10/2008 8:23:29 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There is no political will for off-shore drilling at this time. Same for nuclear power. When gas is $15 a gallon, things may change.


31 posted on 05/10/2008 8:24:38 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
There should have been oil rigs in the Malibu Channel 6 months after 9/11.

Right in front of Barbra's house.

On a serious note - there does not appear to be a strategy to assure (or to recover) secure oil supplies at tolerable cost.

32 posted on 05/10/2008 8:28:04 AM PDT by Jim Noble (ride 'em like you stole 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Fairbanks North Star Borough is spending $1.3 million to check into coal-to-oil conversion locally since the oil crisis will be a community disaster by next year. The study won’t matter at all but it is the thought that counts and maybe Sen Stevens can earmark $250 million to construct the plant sometime in the next decade or so.


33 posted on 05/10/2008 8:30:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's still unclear what impact global warming will have on vertical wind shear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

It was President Carter, who by executive order, banned domestic oil exploration off the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf of Mexico.


34 posted on 05/10/2008 8:34:45 AM PDT by Judges Gone Wild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: penowa

I think that is part of the problem.

The other part is, as a country, the only way to finance the liberal giveaway, is a national debt. And that national debt needs to be bought by OTHER countries to keep it going. These other countries use the money WE pay to fill up our cars, to buy our country from us. Our politicians aren’t about to stop building this house of cards called the US.

We don’t own our country anymore. The politician over the years, have sold us to the Chinese and the Arabs.


35 posted on 05/10/2008 8:38:58 AM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Too little too late to avert the present shortage. It would take years for this to impact US production.

That's the trouble with politics and politcians, everything is short term. We need to be looking long term and begin right now to develop all those areas.

36 posted on 05/10/2008 8:43:45 AM PDT by upsdriver (My kingdom for an acceptable presidential candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

37 posted on 05/10/2008 8:47:03 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers
"The politician over the years, have sold us to the Chinese and the Arabs."

Exactly. And if you and I knew it, so did they when they did it, which is why I'm certain they were willing to do it for their own profit. The bill is coming due for us very shortly, and these people deserve to be strung up like the Ceausescus.

38 posted on 05/10/2008 8:50:52 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Because it may cost some votes, and if something ever goes wrong, ie storm damage, oilspill etc, they don’t want to be associated with it.


39 posted on 05/10/2008 9:04:22 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penowa

They will profit at our expense.

I am just amazed at the stupidity of the average American. Sigh.


40 posted on 05/10/2008 9:11:14 AM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson