Posted on 05/09/2008 6:05:00 PM PDT by yoe
I don't think it applies here with the straw purchase claim. This protects against misuse and misconduct by third parties. I need to check up if any precident was set by this.
How DARE you!
That piece of pulped tree is over 200 years old, so burning it would release sequestered CO^2, contributing to Global Warming, thus destroying the world!
Can't we settle for just a simple shredding followed by composting?
Bloomberg is a Liberal and as such, is an elitist who is opposed to freedoms for the masses.
David Dinkins didn't do that?
Isn’t it written on hemp?
In the Nordyke v. King case, the plaintiff's attorney didn't mention the Second Amendment even though he wanted to, because California has no right to arms provision and the case was in state court. But the attorney for the county which banned gun shows mentioned it, and threw the door wide open for right-to-arms arguments in the briefs.
I hope this gets wide press. It beautifully illustrates the fascist tyrant that lives just under the surface of (all) liberals.
The problem with this situation is in the eventual outcome. Weinstein will probably allow this and Bloomberg will win. The defendent will then appeal and after the Heller decision is rendered get the case remanded to the lower court for re-trial.
All of a sudden we’re talking big money here and only Bloomberg can afford this sort of litigation. I imagine this has been the plan all along.
Too bad we can’t have Patrick Henry defend Wallace, with Washington, Madison and George Mason seated at the defense table.
But in reality, WE will see Hillary as VP. That way, BHO won’t lose that support. Otherwise, the disgruntled Hillary supporters might jump to McCain, who is every bit as Liberal as his close colleague Hillary.
Obama has already taken aim at McNasty and stopped hitting Hillary. Hillary is also doing the same. She believes that the experience she will get from being VP will set her up later for another Democrat dynasty. (2012 and beyond)
These anti-American maggots, never give up!!
I think this incident is showing you can’t get rid of either the First Amendment or the Second by itself. The two protect each other.
Who keeps writing these headlines in ALL CAPS!. Why are you YELLING!?
He is more a Fascist.
What are you talking about, I don’t use all upper case.
I’m not yelling - I’m one of the calmest people you’ll ever meet.
That would be alarmists who have little understanding of the issue. There are quite a few of those on this site.
I wonder what Zenger et al. would have thought about that notion in the 1700's?
If jurors are supposed to ignore the Supreme Law of the Land when making a decision, how supreme can that Supreme Law really be said to be?
If the Constitution is the basis of legitimate government, then any government body or agent that presumes itself superior is illegitimate.
There are far too many of these cheap rich punks who feel they have a right to use their wealth to stuff their own personal political agenda down the throats of Americans.
We should STOP sending these spoiled little rich boys to office.
So who plugged in the headline in all caps?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.