Posted on 05/07/2008 9:47:32 PM PDT by calcowgirl
Does he even know what the technology for drilling today consists of? This is not old man Rockefeller’s technology way back when.
pristine environments? less oil would likely be released to the environment than already is naturally, you’d likely actually be relieving pressure that forces oil to the surface naturally.
“All three of the candidates oppose opening the spigot to the huge oil reserves that are in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. “
And there you have it.
Shhh.... that sort of talk does not fair well for the VC scam to get their payback via “green technology.” It’s dirty, dirty, dirty!
I’m still laughing at McCain claiming to be a federalist, LOL.
They are all drunk with power.
16 - 20 Billion BBls in ANWR
15 Billion BBls in the Chukchi Sea
12 Billion BBls in the Beaufort Sea
Thats 30 years of Saudi Oil imports John, Wake Up!
Federalist? lol
He is truly a man for all seasons and a candidate for all parties, to boot.
> A presidential order bans offshore drilling everywhere else.<
I’m just guessing here.
Billy boy?
John! John! John! We don't deserve you. No one does. :(
The writer seems to have forgotten that the '94 Republican congress passed a bill opening ANWR to drilling only to have it vetoed by Pres. Clinton. Democrats are to blame for high gas prices.
All he needs to say is that he’ll get the fed to step out of the way.
Fat chance, but wishing he would say it and work for it.
Great!!! Let Alaska Make the Choice about ANWR.
There goes ANWAR I guess.
You would be guessing wrong. It was Poppa Bush in 1991, signed an 11 year moratorium on off-shore drilling. Clinton extended it for another 10 years until 2012.
Also, the prez's authority to manage the OCS was granted to him by Congress in the OCSLA of '54, so he relects what the Congress is willing to go along with.
Look at Bush's efforts to open Area 181 in 2001. That eventually ended up in court and it was in 2006 when SCOTUS ruled for Bush and one of the last acts of the exiting GOP Congress was to enshrine that in the energy act in Dec 2006, with changes that they made.
Likewise Bush opened up another area off Alaska last year, which is/will be contentious.
>The ban, issued under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, covers virtually all of the coasts of the North Atlantic, California, Washington, Oregon, southwest Florida, New England, the Mid-Atlantic and the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska, according to the White House.
Drilling in these waters is banned through 2002; the President’s action extends that period to 2012.
Environmental groups would have preferred a permanent ban on all drilling but gave Mr. Clinton credit for using his executive authority to halt the activity for 10 more years.
‘’The President’s commitment is impressive and heartening,’’ Mark Massara, director of coastal programs for the Sierra Club, said in an interview today, ‘’but it doesn’t go far enough.’’
Because Mr. Clinton used an executive order to extend the ban, the action can be rescinded by a future President or revoked in a national oil emergency.
‘’We need legislation from Congress to insure permanent protection,’’ Mr. Massara said.<
This is from an old NYT article.
Ping to #18
No I don't. Bush signed the Executive Outer Continental Shelf Deferral in 1991. Clinton just extended it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.