Posted on 05/06/2008 3:49:16 PM PDT by wagglebee
Nearly ALL Darwinists are supporters of the culture of death in all its evil manifestations.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
...
Well, they all are if they believe that mutation and 'natural selection' are responsible for life.
'Natural selection' is merely differential death and evolution is essentially 'creation by death'.
Exactly the opposite of creation by a living God and is to be expected considering the source of the idea.
I know that Stein tried to popularize his point, but I expect that most of the movie went over the heads of most of the audience.
Marxist/Leninism depends on the theory of evolution. Karl Marx made it very clear that Darwin's Origin of Species contained the scientific basis for his views on the class struggle.
Right - the prisons are just packed full of biology majors and paleontologists who are remorseless killers, and have no regard for human life. Ridiculous argument, seeking to dehumanize people who don’t reject evolution as amoral - sounds like an argument Jerimiah Wright would make.
Despicable it may be, but accurate and substantial.
Wrong:
When two tribes of primeval man, living in the same country, came into competition, if (other circumstances being equal) the one tribe included a great number of courageous, sympathetic and faithful members, who were always ready to warn each other of danger, to aid and defend each other, this tribe would succeed better and conquer the other. ... Selfish and contentious people will not cohere, and without coherence nothing can be effected. A tribe rich in the above qualities would spread and be victorious over other tribes ... It must not be forgotten that although a high standard of morality gives but a slight or no advantage to each individual man and his children over the other men of the same tribe, yet that an increase in the number of well-endowed men and an advancement in the standard of morality will certainly give an immense advantage to one tribe over another.You see, he thought the ability to aid one another, to have sympathy and morality (pretty much the opposite of eugenics) trumps the physical perfection and intelligence that the eugenics movement wants. It is together as a cohesive, sympathetic and moral society that we have the most strength (good Christians should recognize this concept). Individual "enhancements" through eugenics are pretty much ineffective, and even counter-productive if forced, as that violates the morality and sympathy of the society.
Besides, if you want to blame someone, blame the Spartans. They are the first known practitioners of eugenics, and they died out because of it.
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
"Deshpicable!"
This site is becoming a true sewer with threads like these. Hope you’re happy.
Then why don’t you go back to your anti-FReeper site with the others who think as you do.
Without moral guidance of good or bad, Hitler was ‘doing what comes naturally’ to develop the ‘master race’.
Stop with the satire. You’re killing me here!
Quote please?
please explain why Hitler never mentioned Darwin, but often attributed his policies to “the creator”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.