Skip to comments.
U.S. says Iran will Get Incentives "Very Quickly"
AP ^
| May 5, 2008
| Sue Pleming
Posted on 05/05/2008 1:19:05 PM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
LOL.
You've got to love that title..
That is the title verbatim.... "Very Quickly". I would have to say that this double entendre is unintentional, unintentionally funny.
Let's all hope they get the only "incentives" they're really ever going to respond to, a glorious mushroom cloud over Towel-headed Tehran.
To: freerepublic_or_die
Meanwhile “Ayatollah: Iran won’t stop nuke program”.
2
posted on
05/05/2008 1:20:20 PM PDT
by
AU72
To: freerepublic_or_die
the best incentive would be a ring of steel (US and British Navy ships) and a heavy cover of US and friendly aircraft.
Nothing in, nothing out.
mobilize and arm the Iranian students - they’re ready!
then stand back
3
posted on
05/05/2008 1:24:42 PM PDT
by
elpadre
To: freerepublic_or_die
"We simply don't understand why the Iranians have not put more interest in it," the senior U.S. official told Reuters.
Because they want to blow people up ya big dummy.
To: freerepublic_or_die
5
posted on
05/05/2008 1:28:20 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: freerepublic_or_die
"It is not a major step forward, frankly, because we think it was a very good offer in the first place. We simply don't understand why the Iranians have not put more interest in it," the senior U.S. official told Reuters. Condi, sweetheart, read the tag line.
6
posted on
05/05/2008 1:28:42 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Islam offers us three choices: surrender, kill them, or die.)
To: freerepublic_or_die
I always thought the best incentive package offer was “Stop your nuclear work, or we go nuclear on you.”
Of course, diplomats don’t think that way...
7
posted on
05/05/2008 1:29:41 PM PDT
by
BrewingFrog
(I brew, therefore I am!)
To: AU72
"It is nice to see, I guess, that they are keeping such an open mind about this by rejecting it before they have even seen it," said State Department spokesman Tom Casey...Well, all you highly-paid Harvard-educated GS-18s at the State Department ought to be able to understand you're not offering them something to which they'll respond - but they will respond to force, like a bombing campaign ...
8
posted on
05/05/2008 1:29:46 PM PDT
by
Ken522
To: freerepublic_or_die
"It is nice to see, I guess, that they are keeping such an open mind about this by rejecting it before they have even seen it," said State Department spokesman Tom Casey when asked about Iran's commentsAt least there is one person in the State Department with some common sense (and sense of humor).
9
posted on
05/05/2008 1:31:57 PM PDT
by
OCC
To: freerepublic_or_die
To: freerepublic_or_die
“I think this will move very quickly,” said a senior U.S. official, “almost as quick as the strike force amassing in the gulf ready to strike Iran if they refuse.”
11
posted on
05/05/2008 1:39:27 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(Operation Chaos is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.)
To: OCC
Didn’t we learn ANYTHING from N. Korea and their tactics?
To: freerepublic_or_die
I’m with ya bro. LOVE that title. I only wish it had the steel behind it that is implied.
13
posted on
05/05/2008 1:43:08 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
To: freerepublic_or_die
"I just wuv America! Where Maddie? I wuv Maddie wong time! "
To: BOBTHENAILER
15
posted on
05/05/2008 1:47:08 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: freerepublic_or_die
Let's all hope they get the only "incentives" they're really ever going to respond to...when I read the title I was thinking the same thing and started laughing to myself.
16
posted on
05/05/2008 1:47:22 PM PDT
by
jerri
To: freerepublic_or_die
"It is not a major step forward, frankly, because we think it was a very good offer in the first place. We simply don't understand why the Iranians have not put more interest in it," the senior U.S. official told Reuters. And therein lies the problem.
17
posted on
05/05/2008 1:47:25 PM PDT
by
airborne
(LETS GO PENS!!! LETS GO PENS!!! LETS GO PENS!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!)
To: BrewingFrog
Stop your nuclear work, or we go nuclear on you. Of course, diplomats dont think that way...That's too bad. If they did this world would be much more peaceful.
18
posted on
05/05/2008 2:08:28 PM PDT
by
Fox_Mulder77
(McCain's FR tag: McLlort)
To: airborne
And therein lies the problem. Though it reads like it, I seriously doubt that there's really any problem in "understanding" on the part of the "senior US official." It looks to me like a bit of diplo-speak, designed to elicit exactly the sorts of responses we've seen on this thread.
Pretty much everybody does understand the Iranian position ... but diplomats -- whose job is to negotiate settlements short of war -- can't afford to get too specific too soon. The threats need to come from a different quarter.
19
posted on
05/05/2008 2:16:12 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: freerepublic_or_die
20
posted on
05/05/2008 2:23:41 PM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson