Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's a better solution to our energy problems than ethanol. It's called nuclear energy.
The Weekly Standard ^ | 04/28/2008 | William Tucker

Posted on 05/04/2008 4:53:59 PM PDT by Delacon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: Poincare

“A little bit of ethanol can raise the octane rating of gasoline allowing better spark timing which in turn allows the engine to use more of the gasoline’s energy.”

All I know is anytime I put an ethanol blend in my car it loses about 25% of its power.


61 posted on 05/04/2008 6:41:05 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

E=mc2 is the simple equation that explains why so much energy is obtained from fission reactions. The sun burns from fusion reactions. Sorry if you think it is nonsense, but you can argue with Einstein.

Ethanol is also sun energy and can be produced on an annual basis. Hitler ran a good portion of his war machine on ethanol since oil was so short.


62 posted on 05/04/2008 6:41:37 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Sorry, still just nonsense. Modern coal fired plants are very clean. The old high sulphur stuff isn't needed or used anymore. Modern coal mining is above ground and done by massive equipment, endangering no one. And there isn't a massive infrastructure for it anymore, unless you mean having railroads. The green lobby and the farm lobby are much more "massive", "infrastructures". They are also both obstructionist special interest luddites, when it comes to rational economic solutions to energy issues.
63 posted on 05/04/2008 6:43:06 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Yeah, it is always America’s fault!

I big F.U. to the Eurotrash Island Monkies penning the article.


64 posted on 05/04/2008 6:43:17 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

(Ahem) I’d like to try a little of that ‘Iron Pipe’ popcorn some time.


65 posted on 05/04/2008 6:43:58 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Ethanol combustion results in a 20-30% energy gain. Average yield/acre in Midwest is about 400gallons/acre. Takes about 1/2 gallon of fuel to plant an acre for starters. After ethanol is fermented from the starch the high protein feed is left to feed livestock. Stop buying the middle east oil story.


66 posted on 05/04/2008 6:44:24 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

“Hitler ran a good portion of his war machine on ethanol since oil was so short.”

Aw man the Godwin Law strikes early this thread.

So hitler used ethanol, look what happened to him.


67 posted on 05/04/2008 6:45:27 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

‘Modern coal fired plants are very clean.”

True, you must work for the coal lobby.

I’d rather have American coal than Saudi oil, thats for sure.


68 posted on 05/04/2008 6:46:55 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Um, fusion reactions release far more energy than fission ones, by the same matter conversion to energy process. I can't believe I have to explain this to an adult.

Also, most of the German WW II effort ran not on ethanol but on synthetic oil, made from coal, and on coal directly. Its transport system was rail, locomotives burned coal. Its factories burned coal. Coal provided the heat, and the electric power (modestly supplemented by hydro). And coal made the synthetic oil to run the army's modest fleet of vehicles, mostly as diesels, with relatively low octanes. Av gas needed higher octanes and was fairly dependent on imports of Romanian crude, and a few hydrogenation plants for coal conversion.

69 posted on 05/04/2008 6:47:03 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I have no problem with viable options. I support whatever solution will benefit the nation. I also understand that high corn prices have put the squeeze on ethanol, but the INFRASTRUCTURE, costing billions is already in place. Subsidies have mostly gone away too.


70 posted on 05/04/2008 6:48:06 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I don't work for any lobby. But I've seen and visited them, one recently in Page Arizona for example. You can see a plume from a fair ways off, and there is a mild smokey smell, most one can say.
71 posted on 05/04/2008 6:48:35 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
What rot - subsidies cost $1.45 per gallon of ethanol. They are not "mostly gone". Without them, the 10 and 15% blends being used today would cost much more than straight gas. They do cost more than straight gas, we just pay on April 15th instead of at the pump.
72 posted on 05/04/2008 6:51:13 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

‘Ethanol combustion results in a 20-30% energy gain. Average yield/acre in Midwest is about 400gallons/acre. Takes about 1/2 gallon of fuel to plant an acre for starters”

huh, It takes 1/2 a gallon to start a tractor. Then you have to plow, plant, fertilize, spray insecticide and herbacide, then harvest.

All of those products require fuel to produce and transport.

Gas has more energy than ethanol. That is why its been the preferred fuel. We have plenty of it but are too weak kneed to drill in our own back yard.


73 posted on 05/04/2008 6:53:17 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
All I know is anytime I put an ethanol blend in my car it loses about 25% of its power.

I don't know anything about your car of course, but some will have "knock sensors" that will adjust the spark timing to just shy of pinging. I used to drive a Mitsubishi that did and it got so much better millage and power on premium that it was cheaper to run on it.

If your car is running the same spark timing on ethanol blend that it did on regular parafin-based fuel then it would be running poorer because alcohol has less energy per volume than petroleum hydrocarbons.

74 posted on 05/04/2008 6:53:19 PM PDT by Poincare (Hope is nostalgia for the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Humorous, but incorrect, Godwin cannot be invoked here. It states that one's opponents in argument will be compared to Nazis, not merely that they will be mentioned. Here the fellow is not invoking German WW II experience to attack something, he is therefore not accusing any opponent of anything, so Godwin does not (yet!) apply.
75 posted on 05/04/2008 6:53:47 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

“I don’t work for any lobby. But I’ve seen and visited them, one recently in Page Arizona for example. You can see a plume from a fair ways off, and there is a mild smokey smell, most one can say. “

I live about 10 miles from a coal plant. Can see the white smoke which I’m told is mostly steam. People living very closer complain of soot on their cars. Not sure how true that is though.

Modern plants are much better than the ones from 30 years ago. Thats why we don’t have the pollution we did in the 70s.


76 posted on 05/04/2008 6:55:44 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

JasonC, you don’t have a clue about the ethanol market. That is the biggest BS yet posted by you. If ethanol subsidies were $1.45/gallon farmers would be growing corn in every state, even in green houses. What are the subsidies to the coal industry? Care to pull another wild figure out.


77 posted on 05/04/2008 6:56:57 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Let's import ethanol from Brazil.

That is the largest joke on the Environmental-Nazis!

They are bulldozing tropical rain forests to make Ethanol!

Save the Earth, grow biofuels, Woo Hoo!

Chekhov or O'Henry could not have written greater irony!

78 posted on 05/04/2008 6:57:13 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

‘Here the fellow is not invoking German WW II experience to attack something, he is therefore not accusing any opponent of anything, so Godwin does not (yet!) apply. “

Acht, details details


79 posted on 05/04/2008 6:57:48 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

And then use the nuclear energy to manufacture Hydrogen for our cars.


80 posted on 05/04/2008 6:59:06 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson