Skip to comments.
'Smart Gun' Still Hasn't Hit Mark
Newhouse News ^
| 4/27/2008
| Rick Hepp
Posted on 04/28/2008 3:36:07 PM PDT by Incorrigible
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Incorrigible
If these technologies actually worked, they would be of greater benefit to cops than to most other citizens. Cops, after all, are often required to get within grabbing distance of suspects, whereas concealed-carry holders would instead do everything possible to stay away.
Actually, though, even better than a “smart gun” would be a “smart holster”. Such a device could be equipped with a variety of release methods, many of which would not be practical on a gun. Further, because a holster is not subject to the same g-forces as a gun, it would not be as prone to damage.
Still haven’t seen any law-enforcement push to equip themselves with such things, though.
21
posted on
04/28/2008 6:45:11 PM PDT
by
supercat
To: Incorrigible
The controversial law, aimed at reducing the number of children killed by handguns through accidents, suicide or acts of violence...If this is the purpose of the law, then it won't work, even if the technology is perfected.
A gun is a mechanical device. With sufficient time, a screwdriver, and maybe a file, the safety device can be deactivated.
22
posted on
04/28/2008 6:53:25 PM PDT
by
rmh47
(Go Kats! - Got Seven? [NRA Life Member])
To: Incorrigible
From the same liberals who insist that anyone with a file can illegally turn a semiautomatic AK full automatic in just a few minutes, they expect that no-one will be able to disable the batteries in a 'smart gun' and circumvent the biometric mechanism.
Liberals are just retarded. They don't even know how to change the oil in their hybrid car. They're being obtuse on purpose. They don't give a damn about 'smart gun' technology. This is just a gun ban.
To: Incorrigible
***Lt. Carol Ellis, of the New Jersey Institute of Technology Police, demonstrates a gun programmed only to fire when she pulls the trigger. (Photo by John Munson)***
I know my brain is slipping. But this...
I just can’t describe it.
24
posted on
04/28/2008 8:33:51 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
To: Dr.Zoidberg
But Dr. Zoidberg, if you have two claws, how can you operate a firearm?
=)
j/k
25
posted on
04/28/2008 8:40:04 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
To: Candor7
Please, please, please, don’t give them any ideas.
26
posted on
04/28/2008 8:43:32 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
To: wastedyears
But Dr. Zoidberg, if you have two claws, how can you operate a firearm?
With a face like this, I can juggle chainsaws.
27
posted on
04/29/2008 3:05:56 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: Tallguy; Dr.Zoidberg
NJIT's technology works on the same principle as software that verifies signatures on electronic credit card machines at supermarkets. It relies on unconscious, reflexive actions unique to each person. The credit card machines look at how shoppers sign their name how hard they press the pen and the tempo of their signature and not actual signatures. The "smart gun'' uses sensors to measure how a person pulls the trigger. there is no way in hell that credit cards machines can reliably 'undertsand' my signature...at least not in 'my' favor...
in other words, EVERY failure of the tech will be against my needs, does NOT go bang/authorized when it should...
potentially carry a pacification circuit that would allow the state to turn my weapon off at will.
This my FRiends is the real tech being developed...
LFOD...
28
posted on
04/29/2008 6:10:12 AM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
To: Incorrigible
"We know that gun manufactures have already developed these technologies, they just don't want to put them in guns," he said. "The National Rifle Association doesn't want them to do it." Yeah. Riiiight. And GM is sitting on the patents for a water-fueled car which gets 100 mpg, and the WTC was an inside job.
(sigh)
Idiots.
29
posted on
04/29/2008 6:32:23 AM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
To: Dr.Zoidberg
30
posted on
04/29/2008 8:53:58 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson