Posted on 04/27/2008 10:48:52 PM PDT by smoothsailing
“Left means not ever having to say you’re sorry.”
without wright, ayers, rezko, his lunatic wife, bitter and a few other things obama was going to win 40 states. Now he has a good chance to lose 49. Once the morons on DU understand this are they going to be upset.
I agree with the guy. There’s a very palpable thuggish, menacing, psychotic manner about much of the modern American left.
Kerry came within less than 2pts of taking W down in '04.
ChaosBots seem to have forgotten that.
Obama is too toxic to take the chance.
Its not worth the risk that, as the nominee, by some unforeseen turn of events he wins in November. Unthinkable.
Good point! Also, if OpChaos could immediately and very loudly switch to supporting Obambi it would really throw the Demagogues into a panic because THEY would realize on a very large scale just how unelectable Obambi is...... if Rush started pushing very emphatically for crossover voters to support Obambi in the remaining primaries it would have the Demagogues in a panic.
Of course, that might also increase the chances that the Clintonistas could still pull off a switcheroo with the Superdelegates, BUT it would also maximize the pressures and tensions among the Demagogues...... which is the whole point of OpChaos..... (I always disliked the idea of OpChaos because we do not want Shrillary to have a chance of getting to the WH, but now I think it would be best to try to help the Demagogues tear each other apart over Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers, et al).
In addition the only way for the Democrats to get the black vote back would be to nominate Obama in 2012. In 2012 Obama would lose 45 states
If Obama is the candidate this year, he will lose. The Demorats and the media will unite the party around an electable candidate in 2012. And that candidate will be elected president.
If we want to hold the white house for 8 more years we must get Hillary nominated so the Democrats lose the black vote and can only get it back by nominating Obama in 2012. Then in 2012 they lose the working class white vote.
The earlists a Democrat could get elected president would be in 2016.
Are you taking the rat vote fraud into account in your calculations?
Over four months, 28% of Hillary’s supporters have consistently polled that they will vote McCain if Obama takes the nom.
No way can can ANY rat ‘fix be in’ November with that number.
That's why we need to make sure he is the Dem nominee.
If we want to hold the white house for 8 more years we must get Hillary nominated so the Democrats lose the black vote and can only get it back by nominating Obama in 2012.
How do you know that Blacks will not vote for Hillary if she is the nominee? Where else will they go?
What if Obama, after his inevitable demise, tells them to vote for Hillary "for the sake of the party"?
If Obama is so damaged this year (by losing the General), what makes you think the Dems would be stupid enough to nominate him again in 2012?
Hillary is still very dangerous, we can't risk the chance of her becoming the Dem nominee. Obama provides the best hope of getting rid of her once and for all.
Last Thursday, even Paul Shanklin begged Rush to switch over to Obama!
You will probably have a letter in your mailbox Tues. from McCain condemning your harsh, uncivil, take on the country’s civics...
Works perfectly for me Tator!
You will probably have a letter in your mailbox Tues. from McCain condemning your harsh, uncivil, take on the country’s civics...
Works perfectly for me Tator!
oops!
Why and how do you suppose that is? Are they crazy? Or what?
Or that we have a crazy old uncle
I will breathe a huge sigh of relief when the Clintons are completely gone from the political scene.
Until then, I will remain vigilant and wary of them. Who knows what tricks the Clintons still have up their collective sleeves?
Yeah and tell me what kind of race riot we will face in november when he loses. We were already at the brink of revolution when the last two dumbass democrats got voted down...
“Wright’s sermons may signal the end of the Obama campaign, and they may mean the breakup of the Democratic Party as we know it.”
And the problem with that would be...?
“I don’t see how any centrist Democrat can still belong to this party if Obama is its nominee.”
There’s always a place for them on our side, particularly this year.
As for the other comments about all the good the Democrats have done for civil rights, etc. -
I’d strongly recommend you go to Rev. Wayne Perryman’s website (he happens to be African American) and get an eye-opener as to which party, throughout our history, has REALLY been the champion of, and trailblazer for, civil rights (hint: it’s not the Democrats). I highly recommend two of his latest books, Unfounded Loyalty, and Unveiling the Whole Truth (What the Media Failed to Tell American Voters,) or catch his eloquent speaking on cspan/book tv sometime.
So, there, there - as a good friend often says, let not your heart be troubled. The current stife in the Democratic party, even the threat of its unravelling, will be surely not be earth-shattering and maybe some good, some way, will even come out of it.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.