Posted on 04/18/2008 10:41:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
If you want on or off this aerospace ping list, please contact Paleo Conservative or phantomworker by Freep mail.
They are adding a lot of weight at the rear. Given how far forward the wing is, and it appears the main gear as well, they might be able to get the nose gear off the ground while the plane is standing still.
I wonder if the real plan is to try to make it fly on center engine, and use the ones on the wing for take off and climb. That might save some gas.
And Boeing thinks they don’t have to do anything. The Air Force tanker business should be an entitlement they believe.
Their new Dreamliner may never get delivered. I guess that’s what happens when you have no competition.
No comprende, amigo.
Sorry.
Boeing thinks they’re entitled to the Air Force’s tanker contract without any competition. They lost it to Northrop Grumman - EADS and now they’re whining with every lame excuse in the book. This is after they were exposed for cheating the Air Force and the American taxpayer.
The management at Boeing should be looking for jobs.
Best ride was Virgin’s older 747-200 with the extra fuel tanks and a 12 seat/bed (only) first section up stairs.
Always had two stews up stairs. One would be a short, cute, very perky blonde who you knew had saved herself for you, and the other a tall brunette with long thick black hair, who obviously hadn’t saved herself for you, but seemed willing to correct her mistake the next evening.
They would open the door to the flight deck if you could show a pilot’s license. They would do it about dawn on the eastbound TA flights. Wonderful.
One flight MCO-LGW, the Captain was Nigel, Very much a Bomber Command man, complete with the proper mustache and attitide.
Co-pilot was Daphne. She was about 25, with about 5000 hours, movie star cute with a titled very rich father who had insisted she do something “worthwhile,” and then bought her a hew turbo Aztec so she could learn to fly.
FE was Frank, a 73 yr old retired American Airlines captain from Booston with 7500 PIC time in a 747, who now lived in the Cotswolds and flew a “half schedule” or more properly a “ha shed-u-al”, one trip a week to the US.
The good old, pre-9/11 days.
They’re gonna need tail attachments a hell of a lot stronger than on AA587.
Question..why couldn’t you have this configuration, but shut off the tail engine once cruising altitude is reached. It is also available in case of an failute of one of the other two.
The L-1011 wasn't the first to use it.
Way, way back in the mists of time, I flew on one of these. I remember it was very noisy.
But probably lighter than the DC-10/MD-11 banjo fitting.
Assuming you can start it up quickly in an emergency.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.