Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Bush's North Korea Capitulation" (Dynamite BOLTON Op/Ed!)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 15 April 2008 | Ambassador John R. Bolton

Posted on 04/16/2008 7:23:17 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: mkjessup
Yeah, and it looks like you've got a case of it:

"Bolton Derangment Syndrome"

Yeah, and it looks like you have a serious case of IDOSS (inability to detect obvious sarcasm syndrome).

41 posted on 04/16/2008 10:10:14 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Oh come on! It's getting so that people that still admire and support our Pres. are getting treated very disrespectfully on this site by some people that sit and trash him all day! I would expect this from the left wing, but when this behavior is coming from the right, it's sickening!

There, that is my opinion and you can trash me all you want! And yes, you have the right to your opinion too. But much of what some of you Bush-bashers say reveals much more about you than you know. A lot more than it does about us so-called “Bush-bots”! If saying this makes me a “Bush-bot”, then so be it!

42 posted on 04/16/2008 10:39:45 AM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Always include the “/sarc off” tag.


43 posted on 04/16/2008 10:51:27 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Always include the “/sarc off” tag.

No.

44 posted on 04/16/2008 10:57:12 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dsutah; All

The only positive things I can point to about the President these days is that he has kept his pants on in the Oval Office (unlike his predecessor), the tax cuts were good public policy, and Roberts and Alito are on the SCOTUS.

But we do America no service to blindly support a President who is failing to carry out his Oath of Office, and selling out friends and allies while failing to take effective action against our enemies, beyond running his mouth (because talk is cheap).

As I’ve said many times, George W. Bush would have been a great VP for *President* Dick Cheney, because GWB simply wasn’t ready for prime time in 2000, and these coming crumbling months of his Administration are going to validate that.

Go ahead and engage in your mindless hero worship, that says PLENTY about you and your fellow BushBots, and that’s exactly what you are.


45 posted on 04/16/2008 10:59:40 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
No

Then don't b*tch and whine when you get taken seriously.
46 posted on 04/16/2008 11:00:29 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

BTTT


47 posted on 04/16/2008 11:35:13 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Then don't b*tch and whine when you get taken seriously.

No bitching or whining, just amusement at some FReeper's hair triggers and emotional outbursts.

48 posted on 04/16/2008 11:40:09 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
You said in your post #11:

"This must just be another case of ignorant BDS."

No qualifier, no 'sarc off' tag, just a statement made in apparent seriousness.

Now you say it was to find 'hair triggers' and provoke 'emotional outbursts'.

If that was your only reason to post, you're wasting JimRob's bandwidth, and it establishes that you're nothing but a sh*t-disturber.

Try Usenet, you'll fit right in there.
49 posted on 04/16/2008 11:45:51 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Well, it’s been clear for a long time that Bush will do nothing to North Korea that China isn’t on board with.

*BUMP*

Indeed!
50 posted on 04/16/2008 11:47:16 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Now you say it was to find 'hair triggers' and provoke 'emotional outbursts'.

Never said that was the reason for the post but your continued excited and overwrought posts proves that it sure did work for that purpose.

Your bandwidth wasting reference glares as pure projection.

51 posted on 04/16/2008 12:07:27 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Agreed with John Bolton....Bush is no Ronald Reagan.

Bush is proving to be a complete loony tune. Swinging in the wind.

Bolton tells it like it is devastatingly:

Indeed, the North will not even make the declaration it earlier agreed to, but merely "acknowledge" that we are concerned about reports of such activities – which the United States itself will actually list. By some accounts, the North Korean statement will not even be public. In exchange for this utter nonperformance, the North will be rewarded with political "compensation" (its word): Concurrent with its "declaration," it will be removed from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism and freed from the Trading With the Enemy Act. President Bush has repeatedly told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley not to make him look weak on North Korea. If the president accepts the deal now on the table, things will be far worse than that.

52 posted on 04/16/2008 12:19:40 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Maybe my memory is going, but I do not recall President Bush ever comparing himself to Reagan.

You might want to look again at the eulogy he delivered at Reagan's funeral. But discounting that, where such indirect comparison may have been inevitable, this is more than a casual research project I'm afraid, just going to Google only turns up lefty sources such as the Young Turks, and an article from the Nation and Joseph Nye Is Bush our Woodrow Wilson?which alludes to specific comments made by Bush implying a positive self-comparison.

Note, the actual cites themselves are not included therein.

In view of the minimal evidence of Bush's own public self-comparison, the issue then devolves really into what he is saying of himself privately. And from that, we can make reasonable inferences. He has surrounded himself with supporters (notably not Reagan Administration conservatives themselves) who make the comparisons constantly and often. This is provable. Indeed, overwhelmingly so.

If he is not encouraging it (the comparison), the evidence that he is discouraging it is sadly non-existent from what I have observed. This speaks volumes.

53 posted on 04/16/2008 12:52:24 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Bolton is a loose cannon.

H'mmm. That's what they said about Ronald Reagan, Caspar Weinberger, James Watt, Alan Keyes, and on, and on.

The loose cannons often get it right.

54 posted on 04/16/2008 12:54:12 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Not so. He is not getting it right.


55 posted on 04/16/2008 1:00:16 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Your insights on North Korea have always been sound. I have also speculated we will see a hot war with North Korea and this would likely be the true flashpoint to WWIII. What it does by removing trade restrictions is to allow North Korea to buy food. Perhaps the President feels that they will use there limited funds on food for there huge standing army in light of shortages. This of course is not wise, North Korea will continue building nuclear material and selling it on the black market and will keep the population half starved. Eventually something will give and Kim will have a choice to lose power or attack the South. Beyond unbelievable.


56 posted on 04/16/2008 1:27:52 PM PDT by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Why do you consider Bolton a loose cannon?


57 posted on 04/16/2008 1:29:27 PM PDT by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I back the President as well but disagree with you deeply on this issue. Appeasement has failed since Madeline Albright first brought Kim a basketball. North Korea was caught proliferating nuclear material to the Middle East.


58 posted on 04/16/2008 1:32:19 PM PDT by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

The only purpose for your post #11 is clearly what you stated it to be. Now that we’ve settled that, “get a life”.


59 posted on 04/16/2008 3:26:47 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Paul Ross
Not so. He [Bolton] is not getting it right.

Oh really? And why is that? Because you say so?

You and your fellow 23 percenters will have to do better than that.

Dispute what Bolton has stated.

THERE is how you defend your boy.
60 posted on 04/16/2008 3:31:17 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson