Are there any politicians willing to stand up against this?
Posted on 04/14/2008 9:48:52 AM PDT by kellynla
ping
“....there’s nothing secret about plans to morph the United States into a North American Union.”
Right on target.
Are there any politicians willing to stand up against this?
Maybe our resident NAU expert can give us the straight poop on this. How ‘bout it, Ben? What’s the happy word for the day?
Mark to read later...
Talk of the NAU brings odd responses still from conservatives and Republicans. It’s also odd that, even though they took strong stands against amnesty, Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin all refused to even discuss the subject with callers and usually hung up on them fairly quickly. For those three, the NAU belonged in the kook conspiracy category and they refused to allow any real discussion of it on their programs during the amnesty debates.
Laura Ingraham would discuss it, and had the author who seems to be one of the primary believers that it is definitely in the works by our elitist betters.
And for our purist free traders her at FR, the NAU is perfectly consistent with the full free market/free trade theories that for those two to exist, we must also have the free movement of labor, as well as the free movement of capital and goods and services.
All we need now is an Asiatic Union and we have the makings of an Orwellian style world government. Nice. It makes me sick to see our sovereignty go down the crapper. It would be really nice if the American People would wake up.
Somewhere less than what you can count on one hand in the Senate, and somewhere south of 50 in the House. And I'm probably being extremely generous in my estimates.
“Sadly, the cycle of life is turning back toward a Royal order. “
_______________________________________________________________________
My FRiend, I’ve been saying that for years. It’s the only thing that explains the madness; sort of the unifying theory of AGW, immigration, one-party system, the NWO and all of it.
We’ve become nothing more that peasants in the elites’ eyes. Hope we can disabuse them of that notion, eventually...
ALAN KEYES!
Schlafly ping!!
Yet those who would have a "royal order" should remember that they often end badly. Just ask Charles I, Louis XVI or Nicholas II.
And those capitalists who think they can ride the new world order succesfully will probably achieve Marx's dream of uniting the workers of the world.
Mrs. Schlafly lays it out very clearly.
Someone with the time needs to do a research project about UN plans going back several decades trying to implement “regionalization,” with the goal of making world government practicable.
That’s where the roots of these current efforts lie.
Henry Lamb has been following these developments for decades. Here’s a few interesting starting places. Some of it is dated, but contains good links anyhow:
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25942
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/global_governance.htm
The latest word on the SPP/NAU is Obama's article published at Dallas News, just prior to the Texas primary.
He faulted the way Bush was implementing SPP and said that he would bring the unions and the enviros into setting the goals and measuring the progress. Keep in mind that the only private sector group Bush has allowed in is the NACC which is composed of business/industry that are "doing business in or with" the other two nations.
"The only thing that explains the madness." I have also been saying that for years, and I have taken a lot of flack from many folks here. It only demonstrated to me that Liberals are not the only ones who think narrow and don't visualize the impact of the sum of individual events.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
