Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP seeking a single voice on climate issue (effort to find common position on global warming)
The Hill ^ | 4/9/08 | Manu Raju

Posted on 04/09/2008 7:38:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: NormsRevenge

We’re going to have to pull out all the stops and swamp congress with faxes, phone calls, and e-mails just like we did with amnesty to prevent these idiots from going along with the global-warming hoax. It will cost us trillions and tank the economy for decades.


41 posted on 04/09/2008 11:24:46 PM PDT by Mogollon (Vote straight GOP for congress....our only protection against Obama-Clinton, or McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thickman

“My long affiliation with the GOP is about to end. Not only are they idiots, they are late-adopter idiots who are on jumping on the back end of the AGW bandwagon just as the skeptic bandwagon is taking off. What a bunch of maroons - dumbocrats in whigs!”

Hear, hear!

This party is going to the sh**house fast.


42 posted on 04/09/2008 11:29:43 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
“Typical work from our clueless, out of touch, nitwit, tone deaf and simply bloody stupid Senate Republicans: Buy just before the bottom drops out of the Global Warming market.”

They truly are astonishing. Lets adopt a totally ridiculous “cap and trade” scheme in the middle of an economic downturn so we can destroy the rest of the economy while we are at it. Lets drive more business offshore.

Between the moronic ethanol subsidies and a virtual ban on new oil drilling to a Fed devaluing the dollar, the stupid party is worrying about, Global Warming.

43 posted on 04/09/2008 11:36:55 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Supporters of the Warner-Lieberman plan dispute that conclusion, pointing to an analysis conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency suggesting that the plan’s benefits would outweigh the costs.

Were not there numerous analyses "proving" that converting corn and other "renewables" to ethanol and other "alternative fuels" will bring us closer to "energy independence", make air cleaner and reduce "global warming", and would lower the price of oil and gasoline etc. etc. etc.? I am sure there were "studies" doing just that!

44 posted on 04/09/2008 11:42:10 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
I am all for global worming.

Everybody could benefit from a good vermifuge (worming). While my dog doesn't particularly enjoy the shits he gets from the worming process, he's better off for it. As we all would be, if it were applied globally.

45 posted on 04/10/2008 12:16:18 AM PDT by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Republican Conference, said Wednesday’s meetings were the start of talks aimed at eventually developing coalitions that could support proposals to curb greenhouse gases.

That pandering scumbag Alexander should have been cut off at the knees when he first ran for the Senate. I seem to recall he ran against a conservative in the primary. I don't suppose Tennessee has any shot at unloading Alexander and replacing him with somebody decent?

46 posted on 04/10/2008 12:23:31 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The “global warming” hoax is the perfect, fabricated “issue” that will separate the men from the boys, the pandering cowards from the stand-up guys.


47 posted on 04/10/2008 12:31:08 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Atlas is shrugging...


48 posted on 04/10/2008 12:46:43 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Forget it...I'll never be able to pull the lever for McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There exists a test for determining whether any person ACTUALLY believes in Anthropogenic Global Warming. It consists of only one question, which, if answered truthfully, provides an absolute determination of one’s belief:

****Will you swear/solemnly affirm to publicly, openly, and diligently expend every effort to replace all combustion power plants in America with nuclear power plants?****

If the answer is not a loud “YES,” they are not true believers. This question needs to be asked, loudly, of every politician and climate pimp who claims to “believe.”

DG
p.s. “Cap and Trade” is only a mechanism for sending more billions to Communist China, without even getting cheap, (sometimes slave/prisoner made) goods in return.


49 posted on 04/10/2008 1:24:53 AM PDT by DoorGunner (anti-facial retaliatory rhin-ectomy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We do NOT ruin the American economy!

How much time does it take for a Senator to say, “The big bright, hot object in the middle of the solar system propls climate change, not puny little man.”

Did millions of Americans fight, die and become maimed just so this nation can be ruined by environmentalists?

Someone here tell me they believe that mankind is in anyway affecting the climate of the planet. I dare you!


50 posted on 04/10/2008 4:23:17 AM PDT by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

First the Southern Baptists, and now the whole GOP. The conservative movement will soon be dead. Hopefully Rush Limbaugh will hit this hard today!!


51 posted on 04/10/2008 9:14:19 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

First the Southern Baptists, and now the whole GOP. The conservative movement will soon be dead. Hopefully Rush Limbaugh will hit this hard today!!

Rush is at The Masters today and tomorrow.

Jason Lewis is filling in.

It may well be too late to save the ship,, best to have life jackets in hand.. and whistles on lip. (for what or why, I don’t know.)


52 posted on 04/10/2008 10:29:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

53 posted on 04/10/2008 11:17:23 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

RINOs are like the illegal immigrants of the Congress...
doing the legislating the Nanny State work the real Socialists wont do.

It’s right to disdain the move to embrace ‘lets do something’. We need more than Inhofe in there explaining what’s going on. The GOP needs a clear position? Here it is:

Climate Realism:
1. Global Warming due to CO2 is a real effect, actual warming due to CO2 has lower magnitude than IPCC model estimates, there are serious errors and imprecisions in the models that preclude assuming significant warming is a probability. AGW is not a crisis.
2. Regulations do not work. Cap-and-trade failed in Europe and will fail in the US. Action without China reducing CO2 is pointless.
3. The real answer is technology. A move to nuclear power will cut CO2 emissions in half or more. We could meet well beyond cap-and-trade targets by simply encouraging nuclear power.


I think the comments must be missing something.
It’s an election year, and our Spineless Ones are only doing this if there are poll #s that tell them they are on the losing side of an issue.

All the more reason to write notes to Congress and to tell them that Globaloney is a fraud and they are regulating on the basis of No Good Reason. A three-point “Climate Realism” Position is what is needed.


54 posted on 04/10/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT by WOSG (Solve all the world's problems .... Just build more nukes already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoorGunner

EXCELLENT POINT!

“There exists a test for determining whether any person ACTUALLY believes in Anthropogenic Global Warming. It consists of only one question, which, if answered truthfully, provides an absolute determination of one’s belief:

****Will you swear/solemnly affirm to publicly, openly, and diligently expend every effort to replace all combustion power plants in America with nuclear power plants?****

If the answer is not a loud “YES,” they are not true believers. This question needs to be asked, loudly, of every politician and climate pimp who claims to “believe.””

I say YES, and I’m an AGW skeptic. Replacing coal with nuclear will be cleaner and will get the CO2 monkey off our backs for a long while.


55 posted on 04/10/2008 10:36:52 PM PDT by WOSG (Solve all the world's problems .... Just build more nukes already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
I say YES, and I’m an AGW skeptic. Replacing coal with nuclear will be cleaner and will get the CO2 monkey off our backs for a long while.

I have been saying that since the 1970's and have nothing else to add.

56 posted on 04/10/2008 10:45:29 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

>> “Replacing coal with nuclear will be cleaner and will get the CO2 monkey off our backs for a long while.”

Precisely. Furthermore, It is the only option which could actually cause Electric Vehicles (battery powered) to become a net REDUCER of of both actual pollution, and CO2.

I am not personally very excited about nuclear power, but it would reduce our dependence on foreign oil, would reduce actual pollution, and provide stability to our economy. Also, developing countries would (due to decreasing demand from US) be able to buy oil more cheaply, helping their economies. Also, OPEC nations would get less for their oil, thus damaging their economies. With cheap(er) nuclear power, American factories could make vastly more fertilizers, cheaper, for our own farmers and those in developing countries.

FOR THOSE REASONS, and worse, there is no way that environ-mental cases will NEVER allow it.

>>>>”Seattle animal-rights activist Josh Harper sees ‘a spark of hope in every broken window, every torched police car and every mink running free as their hearts desire.’ For the 26-year-old anarchist, those acts are necessary to achieve his ultimate goal: ‘The complete collapse of industrial civilization.’”<<<<

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/27876_harper18.shtml

The above is not some isolated nutcase. There are many thousands just like him and worse. The unabomber believed exactly the same.

We are in a battle for civilization; the barbarians are among us.

DG


57 posted on 04/11/2008 9:33:29 PM PDT by DoorGunner (anti-facial retaliatory rhin-ectomy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson