Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Staff Sergeant nominated for Medal of Honor
Email ^ | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 03/30/2008 8:07:31 AM PDT by LSUfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last
To: B4Ranch

Fair enough. thanks for serving!


121 posted on 03/31/2008 6:56:38 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I will stick with a quote from Patton:

"The way to win a war is not to die for your country, it is to convince the enemy to die for his country."

The Medal of Honor has become primarily a Dead Man's Medal, and is often divorced from the achievement of any major military objectives. Like the Purple Heart, is has become an award you don't want to win, at least if you value your own life.

I'm perfectly happy to be on the same side as Patton on this issue.

122 posted on 03/31/2008 7:03:02 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
But, covering the grenade will almost certainly spare others in the unit, whereas attempting to throw it back lacks certainty and an air burst may actually inflict more injuries to the unit. In addition there is the issue of the decision maker possibly being able to estimate the total elapsed time that the grenade has been in view. No easy solutions.

In World War II a baseball player was serving with the Marine Corps. I think it was at the Battle of Tarawa. The Japanese had been lobbing grenades onto the Marine's position, this Marine was lobbing them back.

After three times, the Japanese changed their tactics. They waited a bit before lobbing the grenade. The Marine picked up the grenade, started to throw it back when it went off.

Needless to say, he no longer had a baseball career.

123 posted on 03/31/2008 7:08:03 PM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
The real purpose of any medal is to see it on the chest of a proud soldier and realize what he has done for our country.

There are lots of other awards for heroism. Anyone with a CIB is a hero in my book. But the MOH is by definition for those that went 'above and beyond." The consequences of going above and beyond in modern warfare is more likely than not, a posthumous award.

Like the Purple Heart, the MOH has become one of those medals that you don't want to receive.

Why would anyone want to be in a position to want a bronze or silver star? I'd steer well clear of anyone psycho enough to have any of those as an objective.

124 posted on 03/31/2008 7:28:27 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
You are an even bigger idiot than I thought if you think that George Patton would agree with you.

You said the purpose of medals is to see them pinned on a live soldier's chest. I'll ask again: Were all the posthumous MOH's and other medals we've awarded in over a century were given by mistake? Frank Luke, Addison Baker, John Jerstad and Vince Capodano all got their MOHs by mistake? Aspberger (mentioned upthread) shouldn't have gotten his Navy Cross because he died in another battle before it was awarded? We shouldn't have ever awarded posthumous Purple Hearts? Colin Kelly's DSC should never have been awarded? The Brits shouldn't have given the Victoria Cross to Andrew Mynarski, who today still inspires young Canadians with his courage and selflessness 63 years after his death?

Why don't you show some courage and answer the bloody question?

125 posted on 03/31/2008 7:36:44 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Excellent post.


126 posted on 03/31/2008 7:38:23 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
You are an even bigger idiot than I thought if you think that George Patton would agree with you.

Tsk. Tsk. Instead of a cogent argument, you resort to personal slander.

The real issue with the MOH is that it has become more and more rare for the medal to reward actions that result in a substantial military gain, but where the protagonist has survived to tell the story. Instead, the award often has come to memorialize tragedies, such as the tragic loss of the two Delta force members in Somalia.

I served with hundred of officers with superlative records who had one of the highest rewards that the military can give, which is a tour of duty at the military academy. While I don't think that they would necessarily be as crude as I have been about the MOH controversy, I am quite certain that they would agree with the general assessment that the MOH has failed to recognize the valor of those who have lead and survived difficult military operations.

There were three different departments who pleaded for me to return. I certainly trust their judgment rather than to listen to your personal invectives.

127 posted on 04/01/2008 12:25:44 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

“The Medal of Honor has become primarily a Dead Man’s Medal, and is often divorced from the achievement of any major military objectives”

Could you show where any US award is linked to military objectives?

MOH FAQ: Congressional Medal of Honor Society

http://www.cmohs.org/medal/medal_faq.htm#1A

10. What are the guidelines for which the medal could be awarded?
10A. On July 25,1963 Congress established a set of guidelines under which the Medal of Honor could be awarded:
a.) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;
b.) while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force; or,
c.) while serving with friendly forces engaged in armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.


128 posted on 04/01/2008 4:30:36 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I totally agree.


129 posted on 04/03/2008 7:34:43 PM PDT by KingSnorky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

He’s running for office!

http://www.bellavia2008.com/


130 posted on 04/17/2008 11:36:03 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

And it looks like he will be awarded the MOH on June 25, 2019.


131 posted on 06/08/2019 7:55:44 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
Milton Olive (USMC)

Milton Olive was a paratrooper in the 173d Airborne Brigade. He was a soldier, not a Marine.

132 posted on 06/08/2019 8:22:36 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

I stand corrected.

Yes, absolutely United States Army.


133 posted on 06/08/2019 9:05:57 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT ("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Medal of Honor and a $1,366.81 per month stipend to boot.


134 posted on 06/10/2019 7:46:26 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michigan Bowhunter

It’s not a Congressional Medal of Honor, it’s simple the Medal of Honor. It’s awarded by the President in the Name of Congress.


135 posted on 06/10/2019 7:51:18 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson