Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How is Money Created?
DollarDaze.org ^ | June 6th, 2006 | Mike Hewitt

Posted on 03/29/2008 6:48:20 PM PDT by ovrtaxt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last
To: nascent skeptic
meaning of 2nd paragraph = having the privilege of being able to create money out of thin air isn't that grand if all of your competitors (i.e., the other commercial banks) can do it also.
121 posted on 04/01/2008 12:17:20 AM PDT by nascent skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: nascent skeptic
meaning of 2nd paragraph = having the privilege of being able to create money out of thin air isn't that grand if all of your competitors (i.e., the other commercial banks) can do it also.
122 posted on 04/01/2008 12:17:43 AM PDT by nascent skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

I wonder if young Alan ever boinked Ayn Rand. She was a sexual freelancer. Same as libertarianism is the religion of freelancers


123 posted on 04/01/2008 12:35:57 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nascent skeptic; Toddsterpatriot
Hey Todd?

I think nascent skeptic has a better handle on it that I.

The banks can create "money" by writing paper loans. But it is the entrepreneur who creates wealth!

nascent skeptic, thanks for that explanation!

124 posted on 04/01/2008 3:52:19 AM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Here was my post #11,
"Now explain how an initial deposit into a bank of $10,000 allows that bank to loan out more than $10,000."

Your post #19,
"$10,000 in cash money in the vault allows them to back $100,000 in loans"

$10,000 in vault cash would be enough to back $90,000 in loans, but you seem to think they create that $90,000 by waving a magic wand. Some secret that only banks can do. A guarantee of huge profits. Create money for free and loan it out for interest.

Your post #51,
"Remember that the borrower almost never gets his loan in cash, it’s almost always in the form of a check, or as a deposit in his account"

It sounds like your scheme works as long as the borrower doesn't ask for cash. Or as long as they don't deposit their check in another bank.

My post #61,
"Just putting money in the vault does not allow them to loan out more than their deposits"

Unless you think the bank gets to "create" money.

Your post #97,
"You can get that much cash the next day, this gives the bank enough time to get cash money from the local Fed, or you can get a check or transfer on the spot"

You can't get cash from the Fed, you have no reserves at the Fed. Your reserves are all vault cash. I wouldn't recommend your first loan involve a wire transfer, when your wire bounces for lack of funds, you'd be out of business pretty quickly.

In post 106 I showed from readily available documents that WFC has loaned out 110% of their deposits

Excellent link. Thanks again. But I asked you how they "created" the extra, like your claim in post #51. If you really looked at the WFC link, you'd see the answer.

And as long as the checks are accepted as "real money" they ARE "real money"

You bet.

Real money the bank itself created by printing a slip of paper with "Pay to the order of", a name, an amount in numbers and words, and an authorized signature.

Absolutely. Until they check is deposited and the Fed doesn't have enough money in your account to cover it. Then that real money becomes fraud and your created money sends you to jail. But nice try.

125 posted on 04/01/2008 11:11:35 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers (and liberals) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: null and void; nascent skeptic
I think nascent skeptic has a better handle on it that I.

I wouldn't be surprised.

Do you know what the Fed Funds rate is? Do you know why it's such a big deal?

The Fed Funds rate is the overnight interest rate on money that banks lend to one another. Why do banks lend each other money? Why would a bank ever need to borrow money?

Why borrow when they can just "create" money to loan?

If you figure that out there might be hope for you yet.

126 posted on 04/01/2008 11:14:37 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers (and liberals) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Ayn was an intriguing personality, and she’s been an influence in my thinking, but I never thought of her as sexy. yuck. I saw bits and pieces of that movie they made about her- it was too weird to watch all the way through.

Of course, Alan Greenspan isn’t exactly a porn star either. lol


127 posted on 04/01/2008 11:41:43 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we’re still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Sorry dennis...why are you wondering that? I’ve only read about or am limited to having read some of her stuff....therefore, I’m not getting the connection. Thanks.


128 posted on 04/01/2008 1:37:27 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Why would they ever need to borrow money if they only loan out less than they have? They’d always have a wad o’ bills being jealously guarded by the dragon in the vault...

They can’t create more money than their reserve requirements allow. Not legally anyway, and there is a whole boat load of eyes watching their books.


129 posted on 04/01/2008 4:29:29 PM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Also, I'm still a little hazy on how Wells Fargo loaned out
$382,195,000,000.00 yet only has
$ 14,757,000,000.00 in cash on hand?

With a system as you describe they should either have
$38,219,500,000.00 in cash reserves or only
$13,281,000,000.00 in loans.

130 posted on 04/01/2008 4:38:02 PM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: nascent skeptic

The different types of money are typically classified as M’s. The number of M’s usually range from M0 (most narrow) to M3 (broadest) but which M’s are actually used depends on the system. The typical layout for each of the M’s is as follows:

* M0: Physical currency. A measure of the money supply which combines any liquid or cash assets held within a central bank and the amount of physical currency circulating in the economy. M0 (M-zero) is the most liquid measure of the money supply. It only includes cash or assets that could quickly be converted into currency. This measure is known as narrow money because it is the smallest measure of the money supply.[7]

* M1: M0 + demand deposits, which are checking accounts. This is used as a measurement for economists trying to quantify the amount of money in circulation. The M1 is a very liquid measure of the money supply, as it contains cash and assets that can quickly be converted to currency.[8]

* M2: M1 + all time-related deposits, savings deposits, and non-institutional money-market funds. M2 is a broader classification of money than M1. Economists use M2 when looking to quantify the amount of money in circulation and trying to explain different economic monetary conditions.[9] M2 is key economic indicator used to forecast inflation.[10]

* M3: M2 + all large time deposits, institutional money-market funds, short-term repurchase agreements, along with other larger liquid assets. The broadest measure of money; it is used by economists to estimate the entire supply of money within an economy.[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply


131 posted on 04/01/2008 7:44:32 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: nascent skeptic

What you appear to be describing is something known in banking history as “the Real Bills Doctrine”.

The knock on the Real Bills Doctrine is that it may be inherently pro-cyclical and pro-inflationary, much like the housing bubble behaved. More activity begets more credit, which begets more activity and then more credit, ad infinitum until the credit bubble collapses. Real bills discounting provides no brake on monetary expansion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_bills_doctrine


132 posted on 04/01/2008 7:59:31 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Why would they ever need to borrow money if they only loan out less than they have?

They can only loan out more if they borrow.

They can’t create more money than their reserve requirements allow.

Create how? They borrow money. How boring. Even I can borrow money and lend it to someone else. When you said they create money, because "Would Mr. Bankerman rather collect interest on $9,000, or $100,000?" you neglected to mention the interest they would pay on their borrowings. Personally, I'd rather pay low interest to depositors than higher interest to another bank or a bondholder.

Your way sounds better, I'd rather create money for free. The profit margins are better. LOL!

Not legally anyway, and there is a whole boat load of eyes watching their books.

Yeah, those eyes would notice if you wrote a bad check to a car dealership, just because the checks are accepted as "real money" they ARE "real money".

133 posted on 04/01/2008 8:20:17 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers (and liberals) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

That 1963 United States Note is nothing other than the Lincoln Greenback series in its last incarnation.

In 1963 you still had Silver Certificates and US Notes as well as Federal Reserve Notes. Silver Certificates were retired when American coinage was debased during Johnson’s administration.

US Notes were an anachronism that functioned exactly like Federal Reserve Notes so they were no longer put into circulation after the 1963 series. A loss for numismatists and history buffs, and a source of new lunacy for conspiracy fanatics who somehow think JFK was killed over the not so mysterious US Note issue.


134 posted on 04/01/2008 8:22:32 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Also, I'm still a little hazy on how Wells Fargo loaned out
$382,195,000,000.00 yet only has
$ 14,757,000,000.00 in cash on hand?

The reserve requirements on certain deposits are as low as 0%.

Reserve Requirements

135 posted on 04/01/2008 8:26:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers (and liberals) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

“Because of your question, I checked to see who was in office in 1953; interestingly, at that time, George F. Humphrey was Secretary of the Treasury as opposed to Dillon and Ivy Baker Priest was as opposed to Granahan. Strange.”

The 1953 C bills were printed during JFK’s administration, so Dillon and Granahan’s signatures were on them. 1953 B bills were also printed during JFK, but with Dillon and Smith’s signatures.

Ivy Baker Priest was on the 1953 bills and the 1953 A bills, with Humphrey and Anderson respectively.

The signatures tell you when the bill was printed. The year designation tells you when the particular design of the bill was created.

http://www.uspapermoney.info/general/chron_s.html


136 posted on 04/01/2008 8:38:58 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Thank you very much for the link! I thought I was going to have to search the last few months of the WSJ op-eds to find where or what I had misremembered, and then, right below your own excerpt was what I was looking for:

Fractional-reserve banking

The different forms of money in government money supply statisitics arise from the practice of fractional-reserve banking. Whenever a bank gives out a loan in a fractional-reserve banking system, a new type of money is created. This new type of money is what makes up the non-M0 components in the M1-M3 statistics. In short, there are two types of money in a fractional-reserve banking system:

1. central bank money (physical currency)

2. commercial bank money (money created through loans) - sometimes referred to as checkbook money

In the money supply statistics, central bank money is M0 while the commercial bank money is divided up into the M1-M3 components. Generally, the types of commercial bank money that tend to be valued at lower amounts are classified in the narrow category of M1 while the types of commercial bank money that tend to exist in larger amounts are categorized in M2 and M3, with M3 having the largest.

137 posted on 04/01/2008 10:31:46 PM PDT by nascent skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Thanks for the history. Things like this are fascinating.


138 posted on 04/02/2008 5:04:18 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we’re still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Thanks for the information. I had always thought the year was when a bill was printed, not designed. Thanks for the link, too. Looks interesting for future reading.


139 posted on 04/02/2008 6:56:37 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
"Would Mr. Bankerman rather collect interest on $9,000, or $100,000?" you neglected to mention the interest they would pay on their borrowings. Personally, I'd rather pay low interest to depositors than higher interest to another bank or a bondholder.

So Mr. Bankerman borrows $10,000 at 2% interest, and loans out what? at 4% interest. With a 10% reserve requirement he can keep $1,000 in the vault, and loan out $9,000, or he can keep all $10,000 in the vault and loan out $100,000.

At The First National Toddster Bank they have:
Single $10,000 deposit
Three $3,000 loans
Income 9,000 @ 4%= $360
Expenses 10,000 @ 2%= $200
Profit = $160

At The Nully National Bank they have:
Single $10,000 deposit
Thirty-three ~$3,000 loans (if the rounding doesn't work for you, think of it as 31 $3,000 loans and two $2,000 loans)
Income 100,000 @ 4%= $4,000
Expenses 10,000 @ 2%= $200
Profit = $3,800

Both scenarios have 10% cash reserves. The Nully National Bank earns 23 times more.
Oh. I forgot to mention, if in both cases one loan defaults:

The First National Toddster Bank LOSES $2,960
The Nully National Bank still earns $680
That's what I'm saying.

Now you are saying, with $100,000 in loans we have the following:

The First National Toddster Bank has:
Ten $10,000 deposits
Thirty-three ~$3,000 loans (ibid)
Income 100,000 @ 4%= $4,000
Expenses 100,000 @ 2%= $2,000
Profit = $2,000

The Nully National Bank they have:
Single $10,000 deposit
Thirty-three ~$3,000 loans
Income 100,000 @ 4%= $4,000
Expenses 10,000 @ 2%= $200
Profit = $3,800

Both scenarios still have 10% cash reserves. The Nully National Bank earns 1.9 times more.

If in both cases one loan defaults:

The First National Toddster Bank STILL LOSES $680
The Nully National Bank still earns $680

OK, what happens if a depositor withdraws his money?

In BOTH cases the bank is instantly in violation of the reserve requirements.

BOTH cases.

So they both borrow

Do you know what the Fed Funds rate is? Do you know why it's such a big deal?

The Fed Funds rate is the overnight interest rate on money that banks lend to one another. Why do banks lend each other money? Why would a bank ever need to borrow money?


Any further questions?
140 posted on 04/02/2008 8:12:18 AM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson