Posted on 03/25/2008 1:10:13 PM PDT by RedRover
Lance Cpl. Stephen B. Tatum
May be worthy of a Savage Nation ping with his involvement in the case.
How Zimmerman and the team handle Dela Cruz is critical to the outcome of this case, IMO.
We’ll post a “live thread” for LCpl Taum’s trial. I believe he’ll be fully exonerated.
I’m very interested to see how a—hole Sullivan acts (or reacts) at this trial and if we’ll see the same type of outbursts he displayed at Article 32 hearings when things didn’t go his way!!
Prayers up for Stephen and his family! My heart is with them.
BTW, here are diagrams of both actions involved LCpl Tatum...
Thank you, RedRover.
I believe LCpl Tatum will be exonerated as well.
Prayers up for him, his family and the defense attorneys.
That will be a great day for celebration. Dear Lord, make it so.
"If he (Tatum) is exonerated, it means the tent pole that the government has been using to hold up their house of cards dissolves," Rooney said.
Any one else notice -- is this moron the idiot that lead the parade of 88 in deriding and impugning the whole Duke LaCrosse Team and assisting Nifong? If so, he needs to be run out on a rail. When are we going to see the other side "hold their own accountable" for their murder of civilians and desecration of mosques? As the Brits found out in 1776 you don't fight barbarians with civilised rules first; the objective is to win -- then impose the rules.
Not sticking up for Silliman but I don’t believe he was a member of the group of 88. If I’m not mistaken most or all of the group were liberal arts profs.
Sentances 1 & 3 are pure BS - NO ONE has claimed they are certain they shot kids, and how the hell do you have 24 dead "civilians" when Sharrat was cut loose because the 4 he killed were armed insurgents.....oh, I see, they were "victims carrying AK-47's"
Maybe once Mark Walker has covered this story for awhile he can get facts straight.../s
Great points, 4wb. There were little forensics gathered from houses 1 and 2, as far as I know, there were no autopsies, nobody knows who shot who. The NCIS agents came up with their best guess scenario.
Walker also commented on the 24 civilians that weren’t on any insurgent lists. I don’t think NCIS did a full search of who was who from the incident. From what I remember, follow-up on the claims made about the four men killed in house 4 was non-existent (except to plug their names into a database).
Hell; we don't even know who's in THIS country (see Medellin v. Texas @ USSC today) let alone who's in Iraq. Insurgent list, indeed. I used to believe that these scumbag reporters didn't know any different, but when the SWORN TESTIMONY of UNDER OATH WITNESSES is ignored and omitted, then you know they too are insurgents and should be hauled up for sedition.
Yes. I'm damned angry.
I don’t have the report but NCIS took some forensics from the main room in house 2. (See my painstakingly created diagram above).
LtCol Ware referenced it in his report. He said forensics backed up Tatum’s story. There were two shooters, firing from three positions.
Walker may be under pressure, but that could mean the editor and publisher are too. That raises alot of red flags.
I noticed your painstakingly created diagram above, and was about to comment. GREAT JOB. I’ll have to go back and look at the reports. I thought there were few forensics to be gathered because the houses had been repaired and due to time constraints. I will check!
Mendoza was the one who failed the polygraph and the question was if US citizenship was held over his head to testify against the Marines. And didn’t little Safa Younis debunk the “Tatum was the shooter” because of some height discrepancies in her claims?
BTW wasn’t more than 1 AK found in the house where Justin killed his ambushers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.