Posted on 03/25/2008 11:02:27 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
A GPS equipped robot could cost effectively pilot a blob of fresh water thousands of miles, especially if it navigates into the right current. A plastic wrapper could keep the water contained as it melts. The ice berg could be shaped into an airfoil both horizontally and vertically to take advantage of currents, waves, and winds. A drag chute or anchor could be deployed when the ice berg moves in the wrong direction, causing natural motion to push it in a desired direction. Maybe melting water could somehow be turned into hydro power to drive a propeller or winch to move the ice berg.
If fresh water is worth 60 cents per gallon the average ice berg is worth $40 million. I could retire on one ice berg delivery.
Me too! I think we should petition congress for compensation. Or, at least, an apology!
Nuts to you guys!
My Viking ancestors used to have a nice gig in Greenland. But then this Global Cooling thing happened.
So hey I want my ancestral birth right back. As far as I am concerned you guys can dodge ice burgs.
Did anyone check up on the obvious error in this “scientific” article.
It claims the ice shelf, 25 miles long by 1.5 miles wide, is “ten times” the size of Manhattan. Quick math shows the ice shelf is about 37.5 square miles. According to the government, Manhattan in 31 square miles including adjacent waters, 22.5 miles if only the land is considered. The ice shelf is thus less than twice as large as Manhattan, NOT “ten times” as large.
If they can’t get such basic facts even remotely correct, why trust anything they Claim?
He makes it sound as though the shelf is suspended above the sea; if indeed it were, when it broke the “thread” and fell, the sea level would rise instantly causing a tsunami.
The pictures show the sea ice to be floating so any rise in level has already occurred.
Ice-shelving is an annual, autumnal event, now the refreezing begins and the winter snows are soon to begin.
Without the warming summer waters, there would likely be too little cloud formation and weakened snowfall to replenish the ground in winter.
We do have the scientists word for it that a much greater breakup and a near total melt along the Antarctic shore took place roughly 9,500 years ago for purely natural, though not fully understood, reasons.
But it is now time to restart the bandwagon.
We recently came out of the Little Ice Age in the early 1800’s which claimed a portion of the Earth’s water supply in the form of Ice and snow, captured by the frozen arctic regions at both ends of the Planet.
The water that is available to the Planet is either in solid or liquid form. The warming trend caused by the recent Solar Maximum has reclaimed some of the solid water, but there is now evidence that we may be headed for another “little Ice Age”, because of a sudden and severe lack of Solar activity. This may be why we have suddenly experienced a record cold winter in the Northern Hemisphere on both sides of the World.
Sun Spot activity as recently ceased to a degree that has not been observed since the beginning of the Little Ice Age. Time will prove this theory one way or the other, but the recent Global Warming trend was also observed on other Planets along with ours. Mars lost some of it’s ice cap in the last 10 years along with ours.
Wilkins was a small outpost named after Hubert Wilkins around 1928 after successfully flying in to land on the ice and then fly out once again.
Kind of like emptying and refilling a giant ice cube tray.
Well it goes down after I take a swallow out of it :)
Study Newton’s 3rd law
It is floating on the water while still somewhat bound by the land; the bonds depend on the state of the solid glacier to which it is still attached.
This is the thread to which the fabulous author referred
Shhh....there will be no rational thought allowed, amidst the hysteria!
Their argument is not melt down from surface heat but surface heat warming the surrounding area waters causing the observed melt from the bottom up.
They first must rule out incursions and any sub-surface heating from volcanic activity which is in its infant stage of study.
Because the sheeple that read CNN, won't be bothered to do the math.
They could have said "Ten Times the Size of Alaska" and a significant portion of their readers would have said, "Wow! What's an Alaska?"
Thanks for that information.
I recently saw a study done in relation to a warm Ocean current that had shifted south along the Antarctic coast. There are as many theories about this as there are misguided explanations.
The only explanation for warmer Ocean currents would be Solar radiation increasing the Earth’s water temps. There is also one theory out there that claims Sub sea Volcanism is partly to blame for the warmer water.
Not one drop of submerged ice can melt until the surrounding ocean temperature rises above 32 degrees, which is freshwater ice’s tipping point. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to heat this much water to 32 degrees. I bet the ocean water isn’t above 32 degrees and therefore this isn’t a global warming melting mechanism but something entirely different.
If the name fits, wear it.
FMCDH(BITS)
Peak warming and peak plant species migration here in my yard in Fairbanks was in 1995.
Well aware of it. What does it have to do with the subject at hand?
2. Once broken free of the coast, currents will carry the icebergs to more northern latitudes where they will melt faster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.