Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Truckers Slowing Down to Save Fuel
Associated Press ^ | Saturday March 22, 12:50 pm ET | James Macpherson,

Posted on 03/22/2008 2:13:40 PM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Kimmers
If slowing down does conserve fuel maybe the delivery times need to be more generous.Do you think that could happen?

Probably not = especially with foods and such time sensitive loads...plus there's the catch-22 of the drivers getting paid by miles driven - slower speeds - longer times on loads, less money -

41 posted on 03/22/2008 8:03:22 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: deuteronlmy232
Nice turk. 300 gallons @ 4 bucks a gallon, $1200. Whew!

yup = and about every 6 months - new tires - "18-wheelers" + $3,000....etc etc

Caterpillar motor


42 posted on 03/22/2008 8:13:42 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bert
OK lets go with your premise.

since the last economic down turn in 1986 the producers of hard goods in this country have gone to a system called JIT (just in time) ordering.

since maintaining inventory is a bad thing producers decided that it was better to use trucks as rollingwarehouses.

so when their computers say they need 20 ton of say eggs for Easter they contract for a truck to be loaded in L A on Monday and it will be in Nashville on Thursday so the eggs can be on store shelves Friday sold Saturday and found on Sunday.

slow the truck down even by 4 hours could result in an additional day in transit thus there goes Easter celebration.

the same principal runs throughout the food chain, when potatoes are loaded on a trailer they immediately start to decompose from the inside out add an extra day to transport and don't expect the nice pretty produce we have gotten used to in America.

THEN lets mix 4 million trucks going 55 with all the impatient cars wanting to go 70+

Barnum and Bailly wouldn't have nothing of the circus that would be the US highways.

finnaly, You bet I think like a Truck Driver for 31 years and just over 3.5 million miles you get first quality goods on nice full shelves when YOU want to buy then and can drive on the safest highways in the world because I'm looking out for not just you but you're wife amd family.

43 posted on 03/23/2008 7:23:41 AM PDT by Pete-R-Bilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

>Why can’t the guy being passed take his foot off the pedal for a second or two to allow the passer to get over quicker.<

You want the truck driver with his 80,000 total weight vehicle which requires six to 20 times the accleration requirements of your car to slow down so that you don’t have to slow down.

If he is going uphill and slows down into the next gear, he won’t get out of that gear untill he nears the crest of the hill. You on the other hand slow from 75 to 40 for a minute or two, which seem like three hours to you, then in 1/4 mile or less you have reattained your 75 mph. Look in the mirror as to who is not being courteous.


44 posted on 03/23/2008 9:17:36 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." FDR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
No, I'm talking about dead flat sections on a two-lane section of a turnpike where a guy going 0.001 mi/h faster than another guy passes.

I didn't say he wasn't being uncourteous. I just asked why.

I don't like other cars passing me very slowly in cruise when I am in cruise.

I don't understand why cars pass trucks in cruise rather than speeding up a bit.

I don't think passing should be a long term event if it can be done faster. And I don't mean insane-faster.

45 posted on 03/23/2008 10:32:34 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I was sitting in the Baton Rouge Airport last week watching CNN. They had a report about diesel fuel prices and were interviewing Truckers.
The reporter was giddy, using the time to bash the Bush economy and he had a bunch of these guys blaming Oil Companies and the Iraq War for the problem. No mention of Democrats blocking energy production or the enviro wackos causing any of the problems.
I was grumbling under my breath, watching the other passengers soaking all this crap up like a sponge. And this was in Louisiana of all places.
Propaganda is alive and well, and the sheeple of this country are too stupid or too ignorant to care.
46 posted on 03/23/2008 10:45:49 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Guns don't kill people, gun free zones kill people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson