Posted on 03/11/2008 3:48:22 PM PDT by varina davis
If you mean that McCain and Romney are both Liberal RINOs, I have to agree.
If McCain wants to have even a chance of getting Conservatives to vote for him, he needs to drop any pretense of asking Romney.
I whole-heartedly agree with everything you wrote. I wish I were good with words as you are. Thanks. Nanny-state taxes and global warming taxes are of great concern to me.
For the first time in weeks, I have even pondered voting for McCain.
If he picks Romney - I won't just not vote - I will campaign for Ralph Nader because I will be so disgusted with Republicans.
I heard Michael Reagan say on his show a couple of weeks ago that John McCain should choose Mitt Romney as his VP to focus on the economy, and he was totally serious. This country needs a person with serious business expertise, especially with the rise of Asia.
no don’t vote for nader...there must be some other 3rd party to send a conservative message
Sorry I wasn’t clear. I meant Romeny and Sanford.
Romney creamed McCain in Michigan, and spite of all the childish rantings he is quite capable of flipping a badly needed northern industrial state like MI from blue to red.
Few, if any other veep choices could bring that, in any state.
Yes, McCain is very weak on economic issues. He even said so. Brilliant move there. /s/
My guess is that IF (that’s a big if) McCain wins, he’d only be a one-termer. Romney 2012.
not much difference between romneycare and ObamaCare except that even Obama doesn’t believe in universal mandates! Obama will crush him.
Still don't get cha. Mark Sanford? Great guy. Was my Congressman when I lived in South Carolina. Good Gov too.
Who are you supporting between the two?
If Romney - take a hike.
thanks for bringing that up. But you are wrong. Romney will trump the dems on the health care issue too.
romney won michigan because dailykos told people to vote for him
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59649
“Poor Mitt Romney, who’s suffered back-to-back losses in the last week, desperately needs to win Michigan in order to keep his campaign afloat,” wrote Kos. “Bottom line, if Romney loses Michigan, he’s out. If he wins, he stays in.
“And we want Romney in, because the more Republican candidates we have fighting it out, trashing each other with negative ads and spending tons of money, the better it is for us. We want Mitt to stay in the race, and to do that, we need him to win in Michigan.”
An image on DailyKos shows a photo of Romney with the words, “Democrats for Mitt: Because the GOP deserves the very worst.”
I may vote for him - but if Romney is on the ticket, count me out.
uh, wrong again.
myself, as well as thousands of evangelicals voted for Romney in Michgan. That’s why he won. Apparently we are the only state where Christians weren’t Hucka-winked... and voila, HEEEERE’S Johnny (McCain).
Great post, and I agree wholeheartedly. (Except mine would be a woman-crush.)
OMG I had forgotten about that!
I think he’d make a very entertaining political commentator. Would’nt be surprised to see him have his own show on FoxNews someday. He really can be funny and right too. But he’ll never be President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.