Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2008 9:01:19 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: LibWhacker
"...a breakthrough for the security industry."

More like a breakthrough for Big Brother.

2 posted on 03/09/2008 9:03:26 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Britain makes camera that "sees" under clothes

They been selling them things on the back of comic books for decades.

3 posted on 03/09/2008 9:05:58 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The women got the vote and the Nation got Harding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Every kid who read a comic book in the 50s and 60s knows there's nothing new about this technology:


4 posted on 03/09/2008 9:07:13 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When you choose the lesser of two evils, you still have evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
It does not reveal physical body details and the screening is harmless, the company says.

I'd buy that for shilling.

5 posted on 03/09/2008 9:07:52 AM PDT by Clock King (Bring the noise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Get me one of those.


6 posted on 03/09/2008 9:08:48 AM PDT by So Circumstanced
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

7 posted on 03/09/2008 9:10:25 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The women got the vote and the Nation got Harding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Isn’t technology wonderful?


8 posted on 03/09/2008 9:10:27 AM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
It does not reveal physical body details and the screening is harmless, the company says.

Let me get this straight, it can see under clothing yet it does not reveal physical body details?

9 posted on 03/09/2008 9:12:25 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Certainly has potential.

10 posted on 03/09/2008 9:14:05 AM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Beware of setting it TOO HIGH:

12 posted on 03/09/2008 9:14:38 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
I'm sure the LEOs will never ever use the device for recreational purposes.

(For you folks in Rio Linda /s)

16 posted on 03/09/2008 9:18:38 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Photobucket

Some things should just be covered.

17 posted on 03/09/2008 9:19:11 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Sony mistakenly released this technology back in the 1990s with their night-vision video cameras. When used during the daytime, the night vision technology sees right through clothing. Those of us who had these cameras were offered refunds if we turned these "defective" units in.

We knew better. And we have a lot more fun filming the cheerleaders at NFL football games.

Hypothetically speaking, of course.

(Insert maniacal scientist laughter here.)

22 posted on 03/09/2008 9:28:43 AM PDT by Digital Sniper (Hello, "Undocumented Immigrant." I'm an "Undocumented Border Patrol Agent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

“It does not reveal physical body details ...”

Worthless!


24 posted on 03/09/2008 9:34:17 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Wasn't this used on one of the Kerry daughters in 2004?

Picture NOT included - thank me later.

28 posted on 03/09/2008 9:46:26 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker


30 posted on 03/09/2008 10:00:28 AM PDT by buridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Big Deal!

I’ve seen x-ray specs advertised in the back of comic books as a kid, and for only $1.

Why don’t they just buy those?


31 posted on 03/09/2008 10:03:40 AM PDT by truemiester ((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

In case you were wondering, I was JOKING!


32 posted on 03/09/2008 10:04:46 AM PDT by truemiester ((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Sony had this years ago!
On some Sony video cams if you activated the night mode during daylight.
They were quick to ‘update ‘ that feature.


34 posted on 03/09/2008 10:13:55 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It does not reveal physical body details .......... OK, so how do we know who is hiding under the burka?


35 posted on 03/09/2008 10:56:57 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson