Skip to comments.
Britain makes camera that "sees" under clothes
Reuters ^
| 3/9/08
| Luke Baker
Posted on 03/09/2008 9:01:17 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: LibWhacker
"...a breakthrough for the security industry." More like a breakthrough for Big Brother.
2
posted on
03/09/2008 9:03:26 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: LibWhacker
Britain makes camera that "sees" under clothes They been selling them things on the back of comic books for decades.
To: LibWhacker
Every kid who read a comic book in the 50s and 60s knows there's nothing new about this technology:
4
posted on
03/09/2008 9:07:13 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(When you choose the lesser of two evils, you still have evil.)
To: LibWhacker
It does not reveal physical body details and the screening is harmless, the company says.I'd buy that for shilling.
5
posted on
03/09/2008 9:07:52 AM PDT
by
Clock King
(Bring the noise!)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
Isn’t technology wonderful?
8
posted on
03/09/2008 9:10:27 AM PDT
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
To: LibWhacker
It does not reveal physical body details and the screening is harmless, the company says.Let me get this straight, it can see under clothing yet it does not reveal physical body details?
To: LibWhacker
![](http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/forum/helent.jpg)
Certainly has potential.
10
posted on
03/09/2008 9:14:05 AM PDT
by
Dysart
To: TruthWillWin
“Let me get this straight, it can see under clothing yet it does not reveal physical body details?”
-
If the technology works on radio waves, that makes sense.
I guess.
To: LibWhacker
Beware of setting it TOO HIGH:
12
posted on
03/09/2008 9:14:38 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Dysart
It detects metal not scales.
To: Izzy Dunne
Thanks for my new wallpaper de jour. :)
(replacing a snowstorm pic)
To: Izzy Dunne
Is that a Tuna boat in her crotch?
To: LibWhacker
I'm sure the LEOs will never ever use the device for recreational purposes.
(For you folks in Rio Linda /s)
16
posted on
03/09/2008 9:18:38 AM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: LibWhacker
![Photobucket](http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a20/SunShinesfussfuss/b16.jpg)
Some things should just be covered.
17
posted on
03/09/2008 9:19:11 AM PDT
by
dragonblustar
(Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
To: Dysart
![](http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/1207/hthomas.jpg)
"which way to Air Port Security?"
18
posted on
03/09/2008 9:19:29 AM PDT
by
DogBarkTree
(The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
To: BenLurkin
"...a breakthrough for the security industry." More like a breakthrough for Big Brother. Not even that. It's just the typical breathless reporting of "Advances" from the UK, usually Medical, that either have been around for years, or will never be heard of again. It makes them feel better, in between Yank Bashing, which accomplishes the same thing.
Read the Daily Mail online for a few weeks, and see what I mean.
A quick search on terahertz imaging shows the extent of the "Old News" nature of this silly report.
To: TruthWillWin
Yep, that’s my understanding. It’s tuned to terahertz radiation. Our bodies are more into infrared.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson