Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle over blood (Professor wants to ban blood banks as "discriminatory")
Santa Rosa Press Democrat ^ | 3/8/08 | LAURA NORTON

Posted on 03/08/2008 1:19:14 PM PST by Roberts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Roberts
The blood banks don't discriminate against gays when they need blood.

Truly the left wing is a suicide cult.

41 posted on 03/08/2008 9:01:04 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

They turned me down for donating last time because my iron count was too low! Can I sue, too? I sure could use some cash!


42 posted on 03/09/2008 1:36:59 PM PDT by buffyt (Obama raises more money in ten minutes than most workers make in a YEAR! and he picks on CEOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

You forgot to add that we should be grateful for that. Let’s have a parade.


43 posted on 03/11/2008 10:38:33 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

good points you make. There are other criteria for blood donations and some will discriminate. There are restrictions about people who have traveled or lived in sub-Saharan Africa I think, or who have been in England during the mad cow outbreak, and a few other health concerns that the blood banks ask about.

Sometimes discriminiation makes sense. In a case of the blood supply, we’re supposed to increase risk to prove we don’t discriminate? But it’s a documented fact that homosexual sex in men spreads various diseases and is risky.

Don’t we all remember in the early to mid 80s there were many people who got AIDS from blood transfusions, specifically because there was no effective screening till then and AIDS was a newly discovered disease then. Why is it wrong to make common sense policies when the goal is public health?


44 posted on 03/12/2008 12:26:35 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Why is it wrong to make common sense policies when the goal is public health?

Common sense?
A person contracts syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis and they go into the system. Their contacts are traced and tested.
A person contracts HIV and ... nothing. It would be discrimination. We mustn’t let it be known that a carrier is an IV drug user or homosexual. The public be damned.

45 posted on 03/12/2008 1:19:47 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson