Conservatives in Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island & Vermont should vote for Hillary Clinton today

vanity | March 4, 2008 | the eagle has landed

[TexGuy]

I will never vote for a socialist regardless of the reason or perceived justification. I wonder how the upstanding 1930-era German felt after he voted for the National Socialist Party candidates and then saw what happened to his country and his people? I wonder how his conscious suited him?

[info_scout]

Hillary is the real Marxist.

Agreed. There have even been hints in the debates. She is the would-be tyrant proposing to null private contracts (mortgage agreements) to freeze interest for five years. Obama had the good sense and at least some understanding of free market reality to call her on it. Obama is no conservative, but there are subtle indications he may respect free enterprise. Paul Volker, Federal Reserve Chairman under most of Reagan's term, has endorsed Obama, and there is reason to believe he has Obama's ear.

[kabar]

Hillary Clinton in her role as America's foremost leftist.

[Gopher Broke]

You are correct...Rush is RIGHT.

Giving Socialist Obama a victory now is a bad idea that will allow him to build on his messiah status even stronger before the elections.

Conservatives should vote for (makes me sick to say it) the Hildebeast, to keep this as a contest as long as possible.

Having these 2 leftists beat up on each other is good for the Republican party and McCain as our candidate.....

[ChurtleDawg]

First, your theory that McCain won because of liberals is absolutely asinine. The liberals were much more interested in their own race. Republicans and conservatives did, perhaps because they wanted something different

[JustaDumbBlonde]

Stoopid idea.

[BlueStateBlues]

Vote Obama. I’d say take Bill and Hill out when we have the chance, and not wait. Then Obama will be up for scrutiny.

Bill and Hill, bye bye!

[Iron Munro]

[deuteronlmy232]

She will shut down his show when she becomes President.

Or she will owe him big time.

[info_scout]

That’s a good read. I really think Obama is fundamentally different both politically and ideologically. Hillary’s rhetoric is laced with the deceit Horowitz describes. In contrast, Obama seems to genuinely believe in the liberlism he advocates. He strikes me as more a conventional liberal vs. radical.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Either way, it will be a Democrat President in November.

[Gulf War One]

Mccain can beat BHO, he would have trouble beating the witch. BHO is much easier to discredit than the clinton machine. She wins today, she will win in november.She loses today, the clinton machine will die.

You could not be more right about this. Fatal error to vote for the witch.

[deuteronlmy232]

Huckabee is a socialist globalist......he has 2 things going for him anti-abortion and 2nd amendment rights...

Now think about it, how can one be a global socialist and be pro-life and pro-article two of the Bill of Rights? That logic is flawed, since for there to be a global socialistic one word society, the first two things that must be done are, first disarm US Citizens, and second destroy the moral underpinning by embracing the 'no more than one' teachings.

Think, forget what Rush and Sean, Laura and the rest of the talking heads are saying, think, Gov Huckabee took over after the clintons, he has the strongest pro-life, pro-gun, pro-tax remaking platform and believes out there. How can he be a global socialist?

[deuteronlmy232]

Rush is absolutely right ...

I see you are from Massachusetts, tell me, was Rush right about Romney? Was your governor Romeny a pro-life, pro-traditional family conservative governor? Not sure? Google "Romney log cabin republican letter". But since the primary is over in Mass, like socialist Maine, I guess all I can say is time will tell. by the way, welcome to the US of A.

[deuteronlmy232]

Thank you, and if you haven't yet voted and if no one else has asked you personally to vote for a candidate, then please let me ask you to please cast your vote for Governor Huckabee.

[1Old Pro]

NOOOOOOOOOOOO

The only way to prevent a Presidnet Hillary Clinton is to prevent her from winning the Dem nomination, not helping her.

[Maneesh]

It’s time to give the Romney bashing a rest. Romney was and is a much better choice than McCain. Most conservatives and Freepers would take him over McCain in a heartbeat.

That does not mean and I agree with Romney on every issue and neither did Rush. He was just the best choice when we got down to Romney, McCain, Guliani, Huckabee and Paul.

Romney is a moot point, I still think McCain will do less damage to the country then Obama or Hillary and the best way to help McCain is to bloody Obama and only Hillary will do that. McCain and his campaign are going to play nice with Obama so we have to find a surrogate in Hillary to dig some holes into the messiah facade of Obama.

[deuteronlmy232]

We shall agree to disagree than?

[mountainfolk]

Take Hillary Clinton out NOW. Will the talk show people take responsibility if they succeed in propelling her into the general election? I would not blame anybody for wanting payback because of the democrat and independent cross over voting in the early primaries which gave us MCain. However, this cutesy idea of voting for Clinton in order to keep the RATS enraged and clawing at each other is merely heaping excess on the already virulent atmosphere they have surrounded themselves with. Hillary will stay in no matter if she wins or loses these primaries. Unless there is some law that says she has to go. Even then the Clinton machine ignores unpleasantries such as legal issues. McCain, as currently campaigning, will not beat Hillary. OBama will defeat himself.

[Maneesh]

We both want the same end result, no Democrat in the White House. We may differ slightly in the strategery to make the happen.