Skip to comments.
Gene Studies Confirm "Out Of Africa" Theories
Yahoo News ^
| 2-20-2008
| Maggie Fox
Posted on 02/20/2008 2:42:03 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
02/20/2008 2:42:06 PM PST
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv; Pharmboy
2
posted on
02/20/2008 2:42:35 PM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
more small . . . more bigLove that grammar.
3
posted on
02/20/2008 2:44:32 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
To: blam
4
posted on
02/20/2008 2:44:51 PM PST
by
Excellence
(Bacon Bits Make Great Confetti)
To: blam
Here we go again. For years they have been trying to prove my ancestors did not arrive on the great ice ship. Still no proof they hadn’t.
To: blam
Guess those Chinese supporters of parallel evolution of Homo Sapiens aren’t going to be too happy with this.
6
posted on
02/20/2008 2:46:47 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
To: blam
This is really stupid .... .
I suppose Africans are still “evolving”?
LOL!
7
posted on
02/20/2008 2:48:20 PM PST
by
nmh
(Mike Huckabee the "religious" humanist that pushes socialism! (Clinton/Carter combo))
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
more small . . . more bigI was wondering how that would have gone over with my old high school English teacher.
8
posted on
02/20/2008 2:50:13 PM PST
by
mtbopfuyn
(The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
To: blam
So I guess the Africans now have a “right” to all the land in the world. That’ll tick the Mexicans off.
9
posted on
02/20/2008 2:51:34 PM PST
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: blam
Turns out that we are ALL African-American. I know that from now on when I fill out those government forms I am checking that box and daring them the prove otherwise.
10
posted on
02/20/2008 2:52:50 PM PST
by
scory
To: blam
The two studies also show that Africans have the most diverse DNA, and the fewest potentially harmful genetic mutations. This is why Africa leads the world in culture, economics, respect for individual liberty, etc... /s
11
posted on
02/20/2008 2:56:20 PM PST
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICTED)
To: nmh
Given the degree of horrific violence, the smartest ones left. Those left behind have some evolving left to do.
12
posted on
02/20/2008 3:12:21 PM PST
by
tbw2
(Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: tbw2
You’re too funny ... that “horrific violence” still goes on ... without “evolution” by many races ... .
13
posted on
02/20/2008 3:16:26 PM PST
by
nmh
(Mike Huckabee the "religious" humanist that pushes socialism! (Clinton/Carter combo))
To: blam
only the smart ones left...
14
posted on
02/20/2008 3:16:35 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: scory
Turns out that we are ALL African-American. I know that from now on when I fill out those government forms I am checking that box and daring them the prove otherwise. Actually a guy I work with (white, blond, from Minnesota) did that on a company form. The HR office gave him a hard time and he stood his ground. The HR office finally dropped the issue and let his claim stand. He was just annoyed that all those forms want to know "race."
15
posted on
02/20/2008 3:19:08 PM PST
by
meowmeow
(In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
To: nmh
My fiction (sci-fi, horror, etc) has the same irony.
16
posted on
02/20/2008 3:23:51 PM PST
by
tbw2
(Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: meowmeow
17
posted on
02/20/2008 3:29:05 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
To: tbw2
Does this prove once and for all that we're all related to the Annunaki?
To: mtbopfuyn
more small . . . more big I was wondering how that would have gone over with my old high school English teacher.
If he knew his stuff, he'd have no problem. "more" modifies the word omitted (mutations)--"more small mutations ... more large mutations." One group has more mutations which are small; the other group has more mutations which are large.
This should not be confused with the comparatives of small or large (smaller, larger). Such a substitution results in a different statement.
"One group has smaller mutations; the other group has larger mutations"
...which says nothing about the relative number of such mutations. Clear?
To: blam
people in white lab coats with test tubes is not a basis for reality.
20
posted on
02/20/2008 3:47:19 PM PST
by
spanalot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson