Posted on 02/15/2008 10:16:57 AM PST by LibWhacker
Good point. However, even with the “big six”, questions remain as to the reliability of the evidence, since torture may have been used in its collection.
torture may have been used to force me to buy my last car, but there is no evidence of it. I believe at least one of the 6 is on videotape from Afghanistan discussing the 9-11 attack he masterminded with Bin Laden. Why would you assume there “might” be torture versus the fact they are guilty?
Your carrying water for the terrorists is disgusting. Once again, the mastermind of the 911 attacks was in videotapes from Aghanistan with Osama Bin Laden, and you are spreading horse manure about coerced confessions. You ignored everything I said and choose to believe in the innocence of these mass murderers. Maybe they should put you in a cell with these dogs so they can show you how peaceful they are.
Of course interrogations (interviews) are recorded. That way they can be reviewed and possibly be used as evidence against the detained -likely- terrorist. The morons are patting themselves on the back because they asked the DoD if they recorded these events and the DoD responded "Yes." Wow. Some shrewd investigating going on there.
Denbeaux might be shocked to learn that the rules of evidence that apply in , say, any European criminal court , are quite tolerant of police interrogation methods that to us may seem brutal. I say, “might,” because surely he can’t be as naive as he pretends.
You have resorted to ad hominum attack. Have a nice day.
terrorist sympathizers are deserving of criticism, I did have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.