Posted on 02/12/2008 3:29:52 PM PST by illiac
Edited on 02/12/2008 4:04:36 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Hillary supports the war on terror. Obama is against it.
Yeah...that’s all likely true.
He’s worse...I can’t believe someone’s worse than shillery.
egads.
Interesting info. Thanks.
It looks this morning like she is done. It’s really unbelievable. My brother-in-law owes me (and the rest of our extended family) a steak dinner. He bet us all last year that she would be the next President. We kept insisting that she was just too unlikable as a person. And that eventually that would be her downfall.
Obama scares me only because I have almost no faith in the electorate. If I was to bet at this point, it would be that he will win the election in November. I think Romney would have been a much better candidate to thwart his “change” message.
Oh well, the “establishment” knows best. /s
Carolyn
It is my opinion. I believe the integrity of the democratic process is compromised when people cross party lines to try to sabotage another party's election. It may be legal to do so, and that party may even encourage it by allowing people to cross party lines, but it is dishonest.
JMHO
Hillary’s lifetime ACU rating is 9; Obama’s 8.
And how exactly do you know that Obama will appeal to independents in the GE? Appealing to independents in a democratic primary is not the same as appealing to independents in a GE, when everyone gets to know the candidates. Nobody still knows Obama's campaign's love for Che. Nobody still knows, save some bloggers, that Obama is the most liberal senator in the nation. Nobody knows yet that Obama is a divider and a cut-and-runner, not a uniter.
And they will know. Trust me. And they'll know more than we all know as I write this.
Al Gore got more votes than GWB. Never underestimate the stupidity of the "independent" electorate. Nobody knows Obama and the fact is that nobody cares. He represents "change". He has a slogan. He is a fad. He will crush the Old Man McCain by pointing out that he is a representative of the "status quo."
Hillary OTOH also represents the "status quo". She has negatives among the "independents" that would preclude her from overtaking McCain. The "independents" love McCain and his positives among independents is nearly universal.
And they will know. Trust me. And they'll know more than we all know as I write this.
More people voted for Al Gore than voted for Bush.
National Journal places Hillary as the #16 liberal while Obama is #1.
Still, quite a difference.
That’s fine. I guess I just don’t understand your definition of “honesty.” Is what it is.
Like virtue among whores. A distinction without a difference.
This is a source of much confusion. The Parties are entirely extra-Constitutional yet use a goodly portion of the Gov’t institutions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.