Posted on 02/10/2008 7:00:39 AM PST by varina davis
>the only reason to vote for me here in Florida is to support the amendment
Ah Joe, I’ve got your back on that one.
note my tagline, although I suspect that your stance will not be terribly popular with the cheerlearers on the Florida board ;^)
I have never worried about being popular. I just read and make up my mind and if others don’t like it, tuff.
Wish more folks did the same instead of trying to go along with the crowd.
That might be the only way to get Rupublicans to turn out but it still won’t get them to color in the oval for McLame.
True, but state amendments won't get it done. This is an Article IV attack on all the States via the U.S. Constitution's Full Faith & Credit Clause. It will require amending the U.S. Constitution to cure.
Karl Rove and George W. Bush knew that when they got state parties to put all those DOMA-related amendments on the ballot in 2004, which makes their use of them an exercise in cynicism, esp. since Bush himself has been behind-the-scenes committed to a gay-friendly policy in the top reaches of the Republican Party, including the appointment of gay men to e.g. the RNC and subcabinet jobs. This gay-friendly stance is documented online. The gay-straight "alliance"-type group at the top of the GOP is Republican Unity Coalition or RUC, their website was
http://www.republicanunity.com/news.htm
Which is now 404 compliant.
They forgot to take down the page cached last month by Microsoft's search engine, visible here, replete with prominent Republican names:
http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=72790376977809&mkt=en-US〈=en-US&w=bc9c32ae&FORM=CVRE2
Charles Francis, listed as a contact for RUC, is an old personal friend of George W. Bush and the spiritus animans behind the RUC. Their basic position is, hey, we're all good tax-paying Republicans, so what if we're gay? Why should we have to put up with those mouth-breathing tent-shouter types in our big tent? We want to make homosexuality and morality non-issues in the GOP. Our party is all about economics, anyway.
The Wikipedia article is here, and there is also an article on about.com:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Unity_Coalition
It does no such thing - you have to have the existence of something in order to ban it. Homosexual "marriage" is a fantasy, and doesn't exist in reality, much less in Florida. The media never missed a chance to show us its true bias - unwittingly.
It does no such thing - you have to have the existence of something in order to ban it. Homosexual "marriage" is a fantasy, and doesn't exist in reality, much less in Florida. The media never missed a chance to show us its true bias - unwittingly.
Wrong. Floridians worked hard to get this on the balot two years ago - in a presidential off-year. This is just a deferred result from years of hard work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.