Posted on 02/07/2008 10:28:18 PM PST by Entrepreneur
I want to chime in one small aspect:
“He notes that Carl Wunsch claimed his views were misrepresented. Its hard to see how when you watch the documentary (hes included in most of the versions making the rounds on the Internet). Apparently they cut a section where he bowed to the high priests of global warming dogma, acknowledging that global warming is occurring. Hes probably worried about future grant money and excommunication. Nevertheless, Wunsch was removed from the DVD release.”
I saw the Great Global Warming Swindle (GGWS) and also the reply that claimed that Carl Wunsch was misrepresented. I thought the claim to be serious and also a good test of the integrity of both parties. So I searched GGWS carefully and found the two brief video clips of Wunsh. I watched each several times. I just cannot imagine how Wunsh could have been misrepresented. He made innocuous points that I doubt he would want to retract. His video clips may have helped advance the GGWS, but no more than to note that there has been snow in Baghdad. It has been months since I watched it, but I think he said it took a long time for the oceans to warm. As far as I am concerned, the integrity of the GGWS has been upheld. The integrity of the critics of the GGWS is suspect.
Click image to launch "Steve Scalise (R, LA) questions Al Gore about a "cap and trade" energy tax " |
Click image to launch: "Newt Gingrich Rips Gore's 'Facts' To Pieces" |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.