Skip to comments.
Five Reasons Clinton Should Be Worried
Politico via CBS News ^
| Feb. 07, 2008
| Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen
Posted on 02/07/2008 4:48:10 PM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
02/07/2008 4:48:11 PM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
The calendar is her enemy. That's an understatement.
2
posted on
02/07/2008 4:52:59 PM PST
by
Malsua
To: jdm
if obama wins the nomination that would be a repudiation of the 8 clinton years and universal health care
3
posted on
02/07/2008 4:54:56 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(Pragmatism: the 4th leg of conservatism)
To: jdm
The democrat race is something that I have not paid a lot of attention to. They are both communists. Obama’s pro abortion policy is slightly worse than Hillary’s, other than that, where’s the difference? Either of them would be a disaster for our country.
4
posted on
02/07/2008 4:55:26 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: jdm
One reason is that polls and primary results reveal that the more voters get to know Obama, the more they seem to like him.They left out the converse: the more voters get to know Hillary, the less they like her.
5
posted on
02/07/2008 4:56:11 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: jdm
ok. the media has dumped her for obamaha.
they're up to something.
6
posted on
02/07/2008 4:56:36 PM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(it's not called the Church Militant for nothing.)
To: jdm
why worry? just break out in tears and the problem is solved.
7
posted on
02/07/2008 4:56:48 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: jdm
first lady should be spookedThe call screener for Rush pointed out the use of this word today. I'm guessing this writer might wish they used a different phrase.
8
posted on
02/07/2008 4:57:11 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
To: Graybeard58
listen to obama - his slick tongue and charisma will be a dangerous thing in november. hillary will lose, him? it will be a tough battle......and mccain does not have it in him.
9
posted on
02/07/2008 4:59:09 PM PST
by
tioga
(Beware: conservative with back to the wall. Proceed with extreme caution.)
To: Graybeard58
I agree, but Obama in the White House might be the slightly lesser of two evils. He’s young, he’s not a socialist fanatic, and most importantly he’s NOT a Clinton.
10
posted on
02/07/2008 5:03:40 PM PST
by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: tioga
I want to see her fail by a ——hair, and have an emotional breakdown, live. If it has to be on pay-per-view, so be it.
11
posted on
02/07/2008 5:05:40 PM PST
by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right but never in doubt)
To: jdm
Time to trot out Bill, cry some crocodile tears, blame it on the vast-black-wing-conspiracy or hope you pick up Monica Lewinsky's endorsement.
Run Hillaryous Run!
12
posted on
02/07/2008 5:06:24 PM PST
by
PGalt
To: jdm
Don’t believe any MSM feint towards Obama, it’s not genuine, in fact it’s the opposite. Hillary has a ton of FL & MI delegates that will be seated.
13
posted on
02/07/2008 5:07:00 PM PST
by
Sax
To: Ronin
Hes young, hes not a socialist fanatic, and most importantly hes NOT a Clinton.2 out of 3 ain't bad, but he makes Hillary look like Socialist Lite.
14
posted on
02/07/2008 5:10:10 PM PST
by
squidly
To: jdm
6. A large portion of Obama voters are historically vulnerable to the most outlandish conspiracy theories (Apollo moon landings were a big hoax, 9/11 was an inside job, the feds dynamited the New Orleans dikes.) If Obama doesn’t win there could be an unpleasant reaction.
15
posted on
02/07/2008 5:10:52 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: ari-freedom
I believe Obama is a universal health care type also.
16
posted on
02/07/2008 5:11:25 PM PST
by
squidly
To: tioga
Yes interesting times. Besides the obvious here is my take
McCain vs Hillary: Both have likability problems. So McCain can’t benefit as much as a Republican nominee should. Huck or Mitt could have exploited this weakness of Hillary much more effectively. McCain trumpets military + cutting costs but misses huge opportunity since many many voters vote based on likability.
McCain vs Obama: McCain loses his “independent” advantage because of Obama’s change message. That is how McCain got to be the Republican nominee in the first place - because of independents. Obama trumps McCain on likability. McCain’s strength is military background + maverick streak and maverick streak is neutralized. So what’s left is his military advantage - so McCain becomes a Bob Dole. Obama exploits McCain’s unlikability.
So McCain has problems with either candidate.
To: jdm
No. 6
The Devil catches up with his own eventually
18
posted on
02/07/2008 5:14:15 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: squidly
My gut feeling about Obama is that he would be a bit more restrained and containable than Hillary would be.
She’s a thug. She fights dirty. Oh hell, I’ve said it all before...
I guess this election is going to be about WHICH socialist gets the keys to the White House. Geez... Thank God it’s Friday. I need to unwind with some chess games with friends and some adult beverages.
19
posted on
02/07/2008 5:14:25 PM PST
by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: Ronin
...hes not a socialist fanatic... Obama seems like a full-on socialist to me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson