Skip to comments.
Religious police in Saudi Arabia arrest mother for sitting with a man (American in Starbucks)
The Times (U.K.) ^
| February 7, 2008
| Sonia Verma
Posted on 02/06/2008 5:30:29 PM PST by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Thanks to Matt Drudge for the article link
1
posted on
02/06/2008 5:30:40 PM PST
by
Stoat
To: Stoat
I have witnessed and heard about several run ins with these thugs over the years. They are pretty much unregulated and don’t answer to the civil authorities. Their presence in Saudi Arabia is part of a bargain the Saud family made decades ago to obtain power.
2
posted on
02/06/2008 5:36:26 PM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: Stoat
couldn’t pay me enough to work there
3
posted on
02/06/2008 5:38:45 PM PST
by
RDTF
To: Stoat
We missed our opportunity. on September 12, 2001, we should have given 24 hours warning. The next day a cruise missile should have turned the rock of Mecca into dust. This religion of evil must be confronted.
4
posted on
02/06/2008 5:42:12 PM PST
by
outofstyle
(There's a rake at the gates of Hell tonight)
To: Stoat
Anyone going to a lion’s den should not be surprised when they end up as food for large angry cats.
5
posted on
02/06/2008 5:43:34 PM PST
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Stoat
A 37-year-old American businesswoman and married mother of three
She goes on to say that she is going to stay and fight, doesn't want them to win, wants change blah, blah (and good luck with that whole beat the radical Muslim thing)....which is amazing when you think of how they already beat her, but is just plain stupid since she has 3 kids! Why would anyone want to raise kids in that environment if they don't have to? Get off your crusade and take your kids out of that horrible place.
6
posted on
02/06/2008 5:44:17 PM PST
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: Stoat
When you sleep with camels don’t be surprised when you wake up with fleas.
7
posted on
02/06/2008 5:47:19 PM PST
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: Stoat
I wonder if she really thinks she can accomplish anything by staying there: These are men who think women are inherently unclean and evil. And a Westerner, even more so. I also wonder if she still thinks it’s a great place to make money. At what cost to your human dignity?
8
posted on
02/06/2008 5:49:24 PM PST
by
Clock King
(Bring the noise!)
To: Stoat
If you hang out with the dogs you’re gonna get some fleas.
9
posted on
02/06/2008 5:52:02 PM PST
by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that that light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
To: Stoat
The muttawah are the very definition of “jerk”. If you’ve ever watched those guys in action, you want to pop their little heads like a pimple.
10
posted on
02/06/2008 5:56:46 PM PST
by
marron
To: Stoat
Sounds like she didn’t keep a lid on things.
11
posted on
02/06/2008 6:00:30 PM PST
by
aviator
(Armored Pest Control)
To: RoadKingSE
Please do not insult my dogs. Not only do they NOT have fleas, they don't like Islamofacists.
12
posted on
02/06/2008 6:18:27 PM PST
by
junkman72
(just another day at the junkyard/time to buy another handgun(VA req.))
To: marron; All
The muttawah are the very definition of jerk. If youve ever watched those guys in action, you want to pop their little heads like a pimple.I have no doubt that you're correct, and I thought it would be helpful for readers to see what you, other posters and this article refer to.
I looked for an example on YouTube and found this by using the keywords "saudi religious police"
YouTube - caught by saudi religious authority
It's probably not the best example, but I was surprised that I didn't see more videos of this sort of thing. I'm wondering if
- Filming of such events is prohibited?
- Uploading or taking such films out of the country is a crime?
- YouTube is deleting them after they're posted?
13
posted on
02/06/2008 6:24:12 PM PST
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
If she wants to make big money working there she better be prepared to suffer the consequences. Most sane women wouldn’t be so foolish as this mother of 3 children.
I’m sorry but as much as I despise Saudi Arabia and ALL that it stands for this woman has no business complaining about living in an entrenched 7th century culture.
Western women simply should not go to or live in a muslim country under any circumstances.
To: Stoat
The barbarity and backwardness of Saudi Arabia and Islam aside, this headline really irritates me. What does the fact that this woman is a mother have to do with her getting arrested?
15
posted on
02/06/2008 6:37:01 PM PST
by
Huntress
(“When you have to shoot, shoot, don’t talk.”--Tuco)
To: Huntress
The barbarity and backwardness of Saudi Arabia and Islam aside, this headline really irritates me. What does the fact that this woman is a mother have to do with her getting arrested?I don't think that it had anything to do with her getting arrested; it merely describes who she is.
16
posted on
02/06/2008 6:40:56 PM PST
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
Perhaps, but the headline writer could have referred to her as an American woman or American businesswoman, a description that would actually have been relevant to the story.
17
posted on
02/06/2008 6:49:54 PM PST
by
Huntress
(“When you have to shoot, shoot, don’t talk.”--Tuco)
To: Huntress
Do you think that it may be possible that the headline writer was sympathetic to her plight, and so she wanted to describe her in a sympathetic yet accurate way?
I think that most people would want to read about a “mother” who was cruelly mistreated as opposed to an “American Businesswoman” who was mistreated, particularly in a fairly liberal UK paper that has not gone out of it’s way to print a whole lot of pro-American articles lately.
18
posted on
02/06/2008 6:55:24 PM PST
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat

"The man she with? He looka like a man."
To: Stoat
Do you think that it may be possible that the headline writer was sympathetic to her plight, and so she wanted to describe her in a sympathetic yet accurate way? Probably so, and frankly, that's what I find irritating about it. When I see a headline like this, I generally see it as an attempt to manipulate the reader's emotions. These kinds of headlines usually show up above stories about people like Cindy Sheehan or Elvira Arellano--women who use their children and their status as mothers to cynically manipulate public opinion. I am actually sympathetic to the plight of the woman in this particular article, but I resent the attempt at manipulation and the implication that she is more worthy of concern than a childless woman.
20
posted on
02/06/2008 7:25:39 PM PST
by
Huntress
(“When you have to shoot, shoot, don’t talk.”--Tuco)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson