Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement of Ron Paul on H.R. 5104[Protect America Act of 2007][FISA]
House.gov ^ | 30 Jan 2008 | Ron Paul

Posted on 01/30/2008 2:50:09 PM PST by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2008 2:50:15 PM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The mis-named Protect America Act allows the US government to monitor telephone calls and other electronic communications of American citizens without a warrant.....The Protect America Act sidelines the FISA Court system and places authority over foreign surveillance in the director of national intelligence...the monitoring of American citizens would still require a court-issued warrant, the bill only requires that subjects be "reasonably believed to be outside the United States ."

You know, he should have fired his ghost writer long ago, or at least have someone proof read his ghost writer before handing it to Paul to read..

2 posted on 01/30/2008 2:56:23 PM PST by mnehring (Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Becoming more irrelevant daily. He’s still running political ads on the radio here in NH. And on stations that couldn’t possibly be heard in any other state. Unbelievable.


3 posted on 01/30/2008 2:57:03 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Bill Clinton: Life Member of the Liars' Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Just more grist for the wheel. R-U-N Paul should right now drop out of the GOP race and go away from political life.


4 posted on 01/30/2008 2:59:58 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

I think the debate tonight will have some fireworks.


5 posted on 01/30/2008 3:00:12 PM PST by BGHater ("Ron Paul won every debate!" Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

6 posted on 01/30/2008 3:01:12 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of all the politics in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

He doesn’t think phoning Osama Bin Laden is probable cause?


7 posted on 01/30/2008 3:10:33 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Now you’ve offended a wonderful part of God’s creation— loons.


8 posted on 01/30/2008 3:13:51 PM PST by Clara Lou (~sigh~ '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
"He’s still running political ads on the radio here in NH. And on stations that couldn’t possibly be heard in any other state. Unbelievable."

Shhhhh......Let the retard waste the money of his donors. Let the ignorant keep sending him money that he can flush. In Houston, he is running ads for the first time in many, many years. He is worried that this largest voting bloc, Republicans, have turned on him there. They have Paul. Chris Peden looks like a great replacement for you. He supports America and our troops.
9 posted on 01/30/2008 3:14:26 PM PST by jrooney (Ron Paul called Reagan a Dramatic Failure and thinks he is smarter than Abe Lincoln.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Why oppose this Ron? Get out there and repeal FISA.


10 posted on 01/30/2008 3:16:38 PM PST by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, the amoral party of what if and whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

“You know, he should have fired his ghost writer long ago, or at least have someone proof read his ghost writer before handing it to Paul to read..”

Why would he? He didn’t read a racist and conspiracy theory wacko newsletter with his signature over three decades. He is probably too busy with more important things.


11 posted on 01/30/2008 3:18:00 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I don’t see where your Paul quotes show any lack of proof reading. Would you please elaborate?


12 posted on 01/30/2008 3:19:37 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
He discusses citizens rights being violated in one sentence, then in the next he admits this is ‘foreign’ surveillance, and later he admits that to spy on citizens, a warrant must still be acquired, thus negating his first comment.
13 posted on 01/30/2008 3:20:40 PM PST by mnehring (Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Thanks. It could use some clarification:

While proponents of this legislation have argued that the monitoring of American citizens would still require a court-issued warrant, the bill only requires that subjects be "reasonably believed to be outside the United States ." Further, it does not provide for the Fourth Amendment protection of American citizens if they happen to be on the other end of the electronic communication where the subject of surveillance is a non-citizen overseas.

I think Paul is saying that an American's communication can sometimes be monitored without a warrant, hence violating the 4th Amendment, if the other party is an overseas non-citizen.

14 posted on 01/30/2008 3:45:15 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; George W. Bush; Revelation 911; NapkinUser; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; ...

Let freedom ping!


15 posted on 01/30/2008 3:47:28 PM PST by CJ Wolf (To Join or leave the offical Ron Paul 'let freedom' Ping, Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Once again, he plays the old role of the perfect (in his mind) being the enemy of the good.. he is pulling the, well, maybe, just maybe, even though the bill says they have to get a warrant, just maybe it could be used for spying on Americans..
16 posted on 01/30/2008 3:48:18 PM PST by mnehring (Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

That’s called “money laundering”!

From Soros to Paul to liberal station owners.


17 posted on 01/30/2008 3:50:06 PM PST by airborne (The Founding Fathers would be deeply saddened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Ron Paul notes that proponents say a warrant is still required but also notes that the wording in the bill belies its proponents.


18 posted on 01/30/2008 3:51:40 PM PST by Cruising Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Delegates of candidates who have dropped out are free to vote as they wish. I think RP is trying to get some of those delegates.


19 posted on 01/30/2008 3:55:35 PM PST by Cruising Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Paper pleeze, ver are your papers?


20 posted on 01/30/2008 3:57:22 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson