Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush convenes Plunge Protection Team
Telegraph ^ | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 01/23/2008 7:20:33 PM PST by AndyJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: AndyJackson
Oh goody, I’m gettin me one of them big fancy flat screen TV’s with that big Gubmint check. Maybe a trip to Vegas to see them there showgirls and play me some Blackjack.
If Hillary gets her way and stops those foreclosures for three months I can skip those damn house payments and use the money as a down payment on one of them there new Dodge Challengers with that cool Hemi engine.
Oh wait, I’m a taxpayer. I don’t think they’re talking about helping me.

Exercising Sarcasm with extreme prejudice..

41 posted on 01/23/2008 9:57:47 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Guns don't kill people, gun free zones kill people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
That's nothing but a conspiracy theory, and Greenspan is retired.

Really? None of us knew that. You clearly missed the point of the article. It is not just a conspiracy theory. It is a real live conspiracy, and it involves the President, the secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, among others.

42 posted on 01/23/2008 10:21:08 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
Exercising Sarcasm

Careful with that around here. A lot of folks are too dumb to duck when you swing it around.

43 posted on 01/23/2008 10:21:58 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Funny, the are still ignorant folks on FR that argue this is a MSM/Dim/Clinton conspiracy

I know. I just caught one. Who kept appointing Greenspan? Who appointed Bernanke? {oops that's right. Until someone just pointed it out I didn't really know Greenspan retired. Should I have known? Couldn't tell it from monetary policy. [/sarcasm]

44 posted on 01/23/2008 10:27:11 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
The best single line in the article, though, is the remark that inflation will nuke bonds just as much as not inflating will nuke real estate. The hit is already in the cards. Squabbling over where it should land will only make it take five times as long and be felt in every possible place until it actually does.
45 posted on 01/23/2008 10:31:01 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

There is no such thing as a PPT, and they’ve never bought stocks.


46 posted on 01/23/2008 10:34:19 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude
You are becoming the minority.

I am right there with you.


I'll stay in the minority for as long as the majority is made up of idiots.
47 posted on 01/24/2008 1:28:07 AM PST by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
if the gov’t keeps trying to mnipulate markets instead of letting them correct we’ll be in the same situation as Japan was.

Yep. Was and still is.

48 posted on 01/24/2008 5:36:16 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Well, I am glad all it took was a post by an anonymous poster to clear that up. Of course no one said they bought stocks. Pritchard’s claim is that they buy index futures letting the index arbitrageurs do the actual stock purchases, I guess, but hey they don’t do this. You just told me.


49 posted on 01/24/2008 5:36:49 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
"The US Treasury is about to shower households with rebate cheques to head off a full-blown slump, and save the Bush presidency.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? The Bush presidency will end next January, recession or not.

Save the Bush presidency's legacy or reputation is what I think he meant. Nobody wants to go down in history as the new Herbert Hoover, who was on duty for the 8 years leading into a depression.

50 posted on 01/24/2008 5:39:28 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
It sure is handy to have the last CEO of Goldman Sachs as your new Secretary of the Treasury.
51 posted on 01/24/2008 5:40:53 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Now I read that France’s largest bank lost money in this mess too. I thought the guys running everything were supposed to be so much smarter than the rest of us, but none of them saw it was coming except GS, who had their hands in everyone’s pocket, long, short, up down.


52 posted on 01/24/2008 5:52:32 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
First, the PPT doesn't exist. People who believe it does after all these years are kooks.

Second, there is no government agency that buys stocks either directly or through any other means such as derivatives in order to manipulate the market. If they did, they would announce it. There would be no purpose in keeping it secret. After all the Federal Reserve announces its purchases and sales of government securities. And on the rare occasions that the Treasury intervenes in the currencies market, it announces that too.

53 posted on 01/24/2008 6:20:34 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

It’s pretty simple really. Our economic growth is based on increasing debt levels. Consumers are maxed out, so now we will see how far federal deficit spending can take us. And then we implode.


54 posted on 01/24/2008 6:41:09 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

What do you think about the idea of increasing capital gains taxes and sharply lowering taxes on dividends? It seems like that would tend to reduce speculation, as well as corporate accounting shenanigans.


55 posted on 01/24/2008 6:57:11 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Soren
What do you think about the idea of increasing capital gains taxes and sharply lowering taxes on dividends? It seems like that would tend to reduce speculation, as well as corporate accounting shenanigans.

I think capital gains taxes should be eliminated (they are the only tax cuts that have been shown to pay for themselves). Dividend cuts are fine with me too. I think Sarbanes Oxley should be eliminated. We should be focusing more on the corruption of government and its waste of money than that of private businesses. As far as speculators go, their influence is greatly exaggerated. Speculators are like surfers who ride the wave. They don't create the wave.

Not that you asked, but the Federal Reserve should stop blaming economic growth and unemployment for inflation, and therefore should stop manipulating the economy with interest rates, which is highly inefficient and destructive.

56 posted on 01/24/2008 7:09:03 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: All
I love it. The government, who pretty much can't even issue a passport much less protect a border or "manage the economy" somehow controls the stock market.

Yup, yup, uh-huh, sure.

Fact is the DOW will rally between 500-1000 points (actually I'm picking 800 but I'll give myself some wiggle room) and then it'll go down and retest the lows.

I ain't no genius, I've just invested for a long time and the above is pretty much how it goes on a percentage basis. Of course there are always exceptions and being an investor I don't trade that but yesterday and today are pretty typical after what we've been through.

57 posted on 01/24/2008 7:20:02 AM PST by Proud_texan (Stop global whining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Raise barriers to trade in a slowing economy. It worked so well the last time it was tried!


58 posted on 01/24/2008 7:24:41 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Yep, GS made a killing, touting long to the suckers while selling short in house.

Bastards. And their CEO is the SecTreas. Very convenient.


59 posted on 01/24/2008 7:55:18 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

LOL.Why don’t you post one of your phony charts showing how great the economy is?


60 posted on 01/25/2008 4:52:31 AM PST by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson