Skip to comments.
RAF scrambled as Russia tests nuclear-capable missiles
Times of London ^
| 01/22/08
| Tony Halpin
Posted on 01/22/2008 4:31:35 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Russian ego boosted by high oil revenue.
To: AdmSmith
2
posted on
01/22/2008 4:31:54 PM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; tomkow6; All
Look like Vlady playing catch with RAF
3
posted on
01/22/2008 4:32:18 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: SevenofNine
I am sure he wants to inspect parading troops on the balcony of Lenin Mausoleum, wearing an Al Capone hat, just as his bosses used to do in Soviet days.
4
posted on
01/22/2008 4:35:14 PM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Let’s go practice in the Barents Sea, shall we? Perhaps Russia needs a reminder of the old days, da?
5
posted on
01/22/2008 4:38:34 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This illustrates just why Gordon Brown needs to stop raping Her Majesty’s Armed Forces and especially, halt the downsizing of the Royal Navy, which despite having lot’s of new super-sexy weapons systems like the Daring Class destroyer and the Astute Class SSN, as well as two new proper-sized aircraft carriers due in service in the next decade, is having to slash it’s current fleet to the bone in order to pay for the new stuff....
6
posted on
01/22/2008 4:41:28 PM PST
by
thundrey
To: TigerLikesRooster
But if you attack your customers with nuclear warheads, they are unlikely to pay their next bill.
To: TigerLikesRooster
if they’re interested in showing off, we should test their missile evasion capabilities.
8
posted on
01/22/2008 4:47:31 PM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
ROFL you got that right
I wonder if there photo of Vlady in his KGB days wearing Al Capone hat come on Freeper google that LOL!
9
posted on
01/22/2008 4:49:21 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: proxy_user
They sell oil, natural gas and military hardware. The West would not boycott Russia oil and natural gas because Russia resumes military harassment of the West again. As for the military hardware, Chicom, Syria and Iran are their main customers. Their posturing only help sales to these characters.
They import lot of stuffs from the West, from cars to cell phones. If Europe or U.S. refuses to sell, they just buy them from E. Asia.
10
posted on
01/22/2008 4:54:13 PM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Looks like it’s back to Keflavik for the USAF.
11
posted on
01/22/2008 5:04:27 PM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It’s happened throughout European history. Some tribe will get rich doing something, have a bunch of kids, and then get adventurous. Nothing much separating us from other species, actually.
The healthier and more prolific the species, the more the perceived need to be a pain in the ass.
Most of the dark ages especially reads like this.
12
posted on
01/22/2008 5:04:44 PM PST
by
RinaseaofDs
(If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything)
To: TigerLikesRooster
prop planes - what a joke- all the pilots are deaf after 100 hours.
13
posted on
01/22/2008 5:09:05 PM PST
by
spanalot
(*)
To: spanalot
Blackjacks aren’t prop bombers. I am surprised they were able to get two in the air at the same time, though.
14
posted on
01/22/2008 5:24:36 PM PST
by
GBA
( God Bless America!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Pavel Felgengauer, one of Russias leading defence analysts, told The Times that the display of power was much less impressive than it appeared. Russias navy was so depleted that perhaps only 30 out of 300 vessels could go to sea at any time. They have put them all together and sent them to the Atlantic. This is just an attempt to show the flag before the presidential elections and to tell people at home that Putins eight years have restored Russias imperial greatness, he said. The Admiral Kuznetsov is due to go in for repairs when it returns home. There are two tugs with it now because everybody understands that it could go bust at any moment. That is kind of funny but Pavel had better know he is high on the Polonium recipient list.
15
posted on
01/22/2008 5:31:11 PM PST
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
To: TigerLikesRooster

The Admiral Kuznetsov
To: TigerLikesRooster
If we were doing full blown strike group war games just off the coast of Russia, the Russians AND the American media would be having a cow.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Can someone with a grasp of the logistical issues tell me if the navy leaving Keflavik alters interception ability of russian bombers on the polar route to any significant degree? I am still baffled by this closure.
To: thundrey
The Royal Navy is well past the point of no return. It is doubtful that the entire RN surface fleet could currently best a single American amphib group.
To: SevenofNine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson